Cargando…

Impact of radiotherapy and shielding on the efficacy of the self-etch adhesive technique

CONTEXT: The exposure to gamma radiation affects the enamel and dentin in teeth restored with composite restoration, but a little has been done to protect from the detrimental effect. AIMS: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of gamma radiation, with or without shielding (0.5 m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Saurabh, Bogra, Poonam, Sharma, Deepak, Goyal, Radhika, Dhir, Saru, Gupta, Bharat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36187859
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_238_22
_version_ 1784799669680865280
author Gupta, Saurabh
Bogra, Poonam
Sharma, Deepak
Goyal, Radhika
Dhir, Saru
Gupta, Bharat
author_facet Gupta, Saurabh
Bogra, Poonam
Sharma, Deepak
Goyal, Radhika
Dhir, Saru
Gupta, Bharat
author_sort Gupta, Saurabh
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: The exposure to gamma radiation affects the enamel and dentin in teeth restored with composite restoration, but a little has been done to protect from the detrimental effect. AIMS: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of gamma radiation, with or without shielding (0.5 mm thickness of lead), in Class V cavities prepared on teeth exposed before and after restoration using the self-etch adhesive technique. METHODS: A total of 75 intact teeth were selected. The samples were divided into five groups: Group I (15 teeth) not exposed to gamma radiation. Group II and III exposed to gamma radiation as per the standardized radiation protocol (2 Gy/day for 5 days/week = 10 Gy/week for 6 weeks = 60 Gy). Group III shielded, using a “0.5 mm thickness of lead” molded into a “C” shaped tube. Standardized Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surface of all teeth and were restored by composite. Groups IV (not shielded) and V (shielded) were then exposed to standardized radiation protocol. All the samples were evaluated for the assessment of microleakage under stereomicroscope. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Statistics were tabulated using the Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA test. RESULTS: Samples showed a significant difference in dye penetration scores. CONCLUSIONS: The samples restored before being exposed to gamma radiations performed better. Shielding with 0.5 mm of lead has shown increased efficacy of self-etch adhesive system irrespective of the stage of exposure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9520638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95206382022-09-30 Impact of radiotherapy and shielding on the efficacy of the self-etch adhesive technique Gupta, Saurabh Bogra, Poonam Sharma, Deepak Goyal, Radhika Dhir, Saru Gupta, Bharat J Conserv Dent Original Article CONTEXT: The exposure to gamma radiation affects the enamel and dentin in teeth restored with composite restoration, but a little has been done to protect from the detrimental effect. AIMS: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of gamma radiation, with or without shielding (0.5 mm thickness of lead), in Class V cavities prepared on teeth exposed before and after restoration using the self-etch adhesive technique. METHODS: A total of 75 intact teeth were selected. The samples were divided into five groups: Group I (15 teeth) not exposed to gamma radiation. Group II and III exposed to gamma radiation as per the standardized radiation protocol (2 Gy/day for 5 days/week = 10 Gy/week for 6 weeks = 60 Gy). Group III shielded, using a “0.5 mm thickness of lead” molded into a “C” shaped tube. Standardized Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surface of all teeth and were restored by composite. Groups IV (not shielded) and V (shielded) were then exposed to standardized radiation protocol. All the samples were evaluated for the assessment of microleakage under stereomicroscope. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Statistics were tabulated using the Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA test. RESULTS: Samples showed a significant difference in dye penetration scores. CONCLUSIONS: The samples restored before being exposed to gamma radiations performed better. Shielding with 0.5 mm of lead has shown increased efficacy of self-etch adhesive system irrespective of the stage of exposure. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9520638/ /pubmed/36187859 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_238_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gupta, Saurabh
Bogra, Poonam
Sharma, Deepak
Goyal, Radhika
Dhir, Saru
Gupta, Bharat
Impact of radiotherapy and shielding on the efficacy of the self-etch adhesive technique
title Impact of radiotherapy and shielding on the efficacy of the self-etch adhesive technique
title_full Impact of radiotherapy and shielding on the efficacy of the self-etch adhesive technique
title_fullStr Impact of radiotherapy and shielding on the efficacy of the self-etch adhesive technique
title_full_unstemmed Impact of radiotherapy and shielding on the efficacy of the self-etch adhesive technique
title_short Impact of radiotherapy and shielding on the efficacy of the self-etch adhesive technique
title_sort impact of radiotherapy and shielding on the efficacy of the self-etch adhesive technique
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36187859
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_238_22
work_keys_str_mv AT guptasaurabh impactofradiotherapyandshieldingontheefficacyoftheselfetchadhesivetechnique
AT bograpoonam impactofradiotherapyandshieldingontheefficacyoftheselfetchadhesivetechnique
AT sharmadeepak impactofradiotherapyandshieldingontheefficacyoftheselfetchadhesivetechnique
AT goyalradhika impactofradiotherapyandshieldingontheefficacyoftheselfetchadhesivetechnique
AT dhirsaru impactofradiotherapyandshieldingontheefficacyoftheselfetchadhesivetechnique
AT guptabharat impactofradiotherapyandshieldingontheefficacyoftheselfetchadhesivetechnique