Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of light amplification by the stimulated emission of radiation, desensitizing agents, and their combined effect on dentinal hypersensitivity in cuspids and bicuspids – In Vivo Study

CONTEXT: Dentinal Hypersensitivity is the most common dental problem, in order to find a suitable treatment plan this study was conducted incorporating LASER and desensitizing agents on the patients complaining of dentinal hypersensitivity in cuspids and bicuspids. Most of the desensitizing agents p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siddiqui, Shazia, Khan, Mohsin, Chandra, Ramesh, Tripathi, Supratim, Jain, Jyoti, Tiwari, Urvashi Ojha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36187861
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_47_22
_version_ 1784799673753534464
author Siddiqui, Shazia
Khan, Mohsin
Chandra, Ramesh
Tripathi, Supratim
Jain, Jyoti
Tiwari, Urvashi Ojha
author_facet Siddiqui, Shazia
Khan, Mohsin
Chandra, Ramesh
Tripathi, Supratim
Jain, Jyoti
Tiwari, Urvashi Ojha
author_sort Siddiqui, Shazia
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Dentinal Hypersensitivity is the most common dental problem, in order to find a suitable treatment plan this study was conducted incorporating LASER and desensitizing agents on the patients complaining of dentinal hypersensitivity in cuspids and bicuspids. Most of the desensitizing agents provided incomplete relief hence the combination of LASER and Desensitizing agents proved to be successful. AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of individual desensitizing agents and c (LASER) and also to know their potential in reducing dentinal hypersensitivity when both desensitizing agents and LASER are combined together and applied on cuspids and bicuspids. SETTING AND DESIGN: Sixty patients with sensitivity only in cuspids and bicuspids and not having caries, restoration, or undergoing any desensitizing therapy were selected. Patients were divided into 5 groups with 12 patients in each group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Air blast stimulus was given for 10 s from 1 cm distance on the affected group. Verbal analog score was recorded. Treatment was carried on according to the groups mentioned: Group I – nanohydroxyapatite was applied for 15 min; Group II – biosilicate was applied for 15 min; Group III – LASER application was done twice for 60 s in noncontact mode; Group IV – Nanohydroxyapatite plus LASER application; and Group V – biosilicate plus LASER application. Desensitizing agent was applied with the applicator tip and was left for 15 min. It was then rinsed and again the stimulus was given, and the score was recorded. The same treatment procedure was repeated on 1(st), 7(th), and 14(th) day and the score was recorded and analyzed using ANOVA. RESULTS: The maximum reduction in sensitivity score was observed in patients where nanohydroxyapatite and LASER application was done. CONCLUSION: All the investigated treatments have promising desensitizing potential, but maximum was found in Group IV > Group V > Group III > Group I > Group II.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9520654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95206542022-09-30 Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of light amplification by the stimulated emission of radiation, desensitizing agents, and their combined effect on dentinal hypersensitivity in cuspids and bicuspids – In Vivo Study Siddiqui, Shazia Khan, Mohsin Chandra, Ramesh Tripathi, Supratim Jain, Jyoti Tiwari, Urvashi Ojha J Conserv Dent Original Article CONTEXT: Dentinal Hypersensitivity is the most common dental problem, in order to find a suitable treatment plan this study was conducted incorporating LASER and desensitizing agents on the patients complaining of dentinal hypersensitivity in cuspids and bicuspids. Most of the desensitizing agents provided incomplete relief hence the combination of LASER and Desensitizing agents proved to be successful. AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of individual desensitizing agents and c (LASER) and also to know their potential in reducing dentinal hypersensitivity when both desensitizing agents and LASER are combined together and applied on cuspids and bicuspids. SETTING AND DESIGN: Sixty patients with sensitivity only in cuspids and bicuspids and not having caries, restoration, or undergoing any desensitizing therapy were selected. Patients were divided into 5 groups with 12 patients in each group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Air blast stimulus was given for 10 s from 1 cm distance on the affected group. Verbal analog score was recorded. Treatment was carried on according to the groups mentioned: Group I – nanohydroxyapatite was applied for 15 min; Group II – biosilicate was applied for 15 min; Group III – LASER application was done twice for 60 s in noncontact mode; Group IV – Nanohydroxyapatite plus LASER application; and Group V – biosilicate plus LASER application. Desensitizing agent was applied with the applicator tip and was left for 15 min. It was then rinsed and again the stimulus was given, and the score was recorded. The same treatment procedure was repeated on 1(st), 7(th), and 14(th) day and the score was recorded and analyzed using ANOVA. RESULTS: The maximum reduction in sensitivity score was observed in patients where nanohydroxyapatite and LASER application was done. CONCLUSION: All the investigated treatments have promising desensitizing potential, but maximum was found in Group IV > Group V > Group III > Group I > Group II. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9520654/ /pubmed/36187861 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_47_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Siddiqui, Shazia
Khan, Mohsin
Chandra, Ramesh
Tripathi, Supratim
Jain, Jyoti
Tiwari, Urvashi Ojha
Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of light amplification by the stimulated emission of radiation, desensitizing agents, and their combined effect on dentinal hypersensitivity in cuspids and bicuspids – In Vivo Study
title Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of light amplification by the stimulated emission of radiation, desensitizing agents, and their combined effect on dentinal hypersensitivity in cuspids and bicuspids – In Vivo Study
title_full Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of light amplification by the stimulated emission of radiation, desensitizing agents, and their combined effect on dentinal hypersensitivity in cuspids and bicuspids – In Vivo Study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of light amplification by the stimulated emission of radiation, desensitizing agents, and their combined effect on dentinal hypersensitivity in cuspids and bicuspids – In Vivo Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of light amplification by the stimulated emission of radiation, desensitizing agents, and their combined effect on dentinal hypersensitivity in cuspids and bicuspids – In Vivo Study
title_short Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of light amplification by the stimulated emission of radiation, desensitizing agents, and their combined effect on dentinal hypersensitivity in cuspids and bicuspids – In Vivo Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of the efficacy of light amplification by the stimulated emission of radiation, desensitizing agents, and their combined effect on dentinal hypersensitivity in cuspids and bicuspids – in vivo study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36187861
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_47_22
work_keys_str_mv AT siddiquishazia comparativeevaluationoftheefficacyoflightamplificationbythestimulatedemissionofradiationdesensitizingagentsandtheircombinedeffectondentinalhypersensitivityincuspidsandbicuspidsinvivostudy
AT khanmohsin comparativeevaluationoftheefficacyoflightamplificationbythestimulatedemissionofradiationdesensitizingagentsandtheircombinedeffectondentinalhypersensitivityincuspidsandbicuspidsinvivostudy
AT chandraramesh comparativeevaluationoftheefficacyoflightamplificationbythestimulatedemissionofradiationdesensitizingagentsandtheircombinedeffectondentinalhypersensitivityincuspidsandbicuspidsinvivostudy
AT tripathisupratim comparativeevaluationoftheefficacyoflightamplificationbythestimulatedemissionofradiationdesensitizingagentsandtheircombinedeffectondentinalhypersensitivityincuspidsandbicuspidsinvivostudy
AT jainjyoti comparativeevaluationoftheefficacyoflightamplificationbythestimulatedemissionofradiationdesensitizingagentsandtheircombinedeffectondentinalhypersensitivityincuspidsandbicuspidsinvivostudy
AT tiwariurvashiojha comparativeevaluationoftheefficacyoflightamplificationbythestimulatedemissionofradiationdesensitizingagentsandtheircombinedeffectondentinalhypersensitivityincuspidsandbicuspidsinvivostudy