Cargando…

The effect of chitosan nanoparticle, citric acid, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on dentin smear layer using two different irrigation needles: A scanning electron microscope study

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of chitosan (CS) nanoparticles (CNPs), citric acid (CA), and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) in removing the smear layer using two different irrigation needles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Palatal roots of 70 maxillary first molars...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hussein, Esraa Raad, S. Shukri, Biland M., Ibrahim, Raad H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36187868
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_178_22
_version_ 1784799674248462336
author Hussein, Esraa Raad
S. Shukri, Biland M.
Ibrahim, Raad H.
author_facet Hussein, Esraa Raad
S. Shukri, Biland M.
Ibrahim, Raad H.
author_sort Hussein, Esraa Raad
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of chitosan (CS) nanoparticles (CNPs), citric acid (CA), and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) in removing the smear layer using two different irrigation needles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Palatal roots of 70 maxillary first molars were decoronated, instrumented, and divided into four experimental groups (n = 20) and one control group (n = 10). The groups received a final rinse of 0.5% CNPs, 10% CA, 17% EDTA, and distilled water for 3 min. Every group was subdivided into two subsections: IrriFlex(®) endodontic or ProRinse(®) irrigation needles. Specimens were divided lengthwise and viewed under a scanning electron microscope for evaluation. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U-tests were used to compare the results (P < 0.05). RESULTS: CNPs were as efficient as CA and EDTA as a chelating agent. However, significantly more efficient apically. At all three levels, there was no significant difference between A1 and A2. At the coronal and middle levels, there was a significant difference between B1 and B2, as well as apically between C1 and C2. CONCLUSIONS: CNPs remove the smear layer with the same efficiency as other irrigants utilized in this study at coronal and middle levels and more efficiently at the apical levels. IrriFlex(®) was more effective than ProRinse(®) in removing the smear layer when used with EDTA and CA, while there was no difference when used with CNPs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9520656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95206562022-09-30 The effect of chitosan nanoparticle, citric acid, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on dentin smear layer using two different irrigation needles: A scanning electron microscope study Hussein, Esraa Raad S. Shukri, Biland M. Ibrahim, Raad H. J Conserv Dent Original Article OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of chitosan (CS) nanoparticles (CNPs), citric acid (CA), and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) in removing the smear layer using two different irrigation needles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Palatal roots of 70 maxillary first molars were decoronated, instrumented, and divided into four experimental groups (n = 20) and one control group (n = 10). The groups received a final rinse of 0.5% CNPs, 10% CA, 17% EDTA, and distilled water for 3 min. Every group was subdivided into two subsections: IrriFlex(®) endodontic or ProRinse(®) irrigation needles. Specimens were divided lengthwise and viewed under a scanning electron microscope for evaluation. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U-tests were used to compare the results (P < 0.05). RESULTS: CNPs were as efficient as CA and EDTA as a chelating agent. However, significantly more efficient apically. At all three levels, there was no significant difference between A1 and A2. At the coronal and middle levels, there was a significant difference between B1 and B2, as well as apically between C1 and C2. CONCLUSIONS: CNPs remove the smear layer with the same efficiency as other irrigants utilized in this study at coronal and middle levels and more efficiently at the apical levels. IrriFlex(®) was more effective than ProRinse(®) in removing the smear layer when used with EDTA and CA, while there was no difference when used with CNPs. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9520656/ /pubmed/36187868 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_178_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hussein, Esraa Raad
S. Shukri, Biland M.
Ibrahim, Raad H.
The effect of chitosan nanoparticle, citric acid, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on dentin smear layer using two different irrigation needles: A scanning electron microscope study
title The effect of chitosan nanoparticle, citric acid, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on dentin smear layer using two different irrigation needles: A scanning electron microscope study
title_full The effect of chitosan nanoparticle, citric acid, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on dentin smear layer using two different irrigation needles: A scanning electron microscope study
title_fullStr The effect of chitosan nanoparticle, citric acid, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on dentin smear layer using two different irrigation needles: A scanning electron microscope study
title_full_unstemmed The effect of chitosan nanoparticle, citric acid, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on dentin smear layer using two different irrigation needles: A scanning electron microscope study
title_short The effect of chitosan nanoparticle, citric acid, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on dentin smear layer using two different irrigation needles: A scanning electron microscope study
title_sort effect of chitosan nanoparticle, citric acid, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on dentin smear layer using two different irrigation needles: a scanning electron microscope study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36187868
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_178_22
work_keys_str_mv AT husseinesraaraad theeffectofchitosannanoparticlecitricacidandethylenediaminetetraaceticacidondentinsmearlayerusingtwodifferentirrigationneedlesascanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT sshukribilandm theeffectofchitosannanoparticlecitricacidandethylenediaminetetraaceticacidondentinsmearlayerusingtwodifferentirrigationneedlesascanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT ibrahimraadh theeffectofchitosannanoparticlecitricacidandethylenediaminetetraaceticacidondentinsmearlayerusingtwodifferentirrigationneedlesascanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT husseinesraaraad effectofchitosannanoparticlecitricacidandethylenediaminetetraaceticacidondentinsmearlayerusingtwodifferentirrigationneedlesascanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT sshukribilandm effectofchitosannanoparticlecitricacidandethylenediaminetetraaceticacidondentinsmearlayerusingtwodifferentirrigationneedlesascanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT ibrahimraadh effectofchitosannanoparticlecitricacidandethylenediaminetetraaceticacidondentinsmearlayerusingtwodifferentirrigationneedlesascanningelectronmicroscopestudy