Cargando…
A mixed-methods study of quality differences between applied documentation approaches in nursing homes
BACKGROUND: Several approaches to nursing documentation exist. Some address standardised terminology and daily monitoring, whereas the structural model approach focuses on open-ended text information and special incidents. This study aims to identify quality differences between available documentati...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36171628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01046-2 |
_version_ | 1784799726830354432 |
---|---|
author | Larjow, Eugenia von Fintel, Madlen Busse, Annette |
author_facet | Larjow, Eugenia von Fintel, Madlen Busse, Annette |
author_sort | Larjow, Eugenia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Several approaches to nursing documentation exist. Some address standardised terminology and daily monitoring, whereas the structural model approach focuses on open-ended text information and special incidents. This study aims to identify quality differences between available documentation approaches from the perspectives of nursing professionals in Germany. METHODS: Between October 2018 and May 2019, a convenience sample of German nursing home practitioners was surveyed concerning the quality of their documentation techniques. The quality measurement was developed from the findings of a literature review on indicators that define successful nursing documentation. Selected indicators were structured according to Donabedian’s quality dimensions of structure, process, and outcome. A mean score was calculated for each quality dimension. Non-parametric tests were employed to discover whether organisational and person-related conditions affect score values. The framework method was used to analyse textual data. RESULTS: Responses from 250 nursing care practitioners show significant differences between users of different documentation approaches in the outcome dimension. Nurses who worked with the structural model were slightly more satisfied with their documentation approach than users of other approaches. In addition, differences between subgroups were identified depending on the mode of the tools employed for nursing documentation, participation in training, and length of time spent using the present documentation tool. Qualitative data reveal that digitalisation, unequal task distribution, and appreciation and motivation are critical topics in nursing homes. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that regular opportunities to reflect on challenges in documentation activities might increase nurses’ perceptions of documentation as a valuable part of nursing care. Training might serve this purpose for users of non-structural model approaches. Regardless of the specific recording techniques employed, more investment in digital infrastructure is required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9520897 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95208972022-09-30 A mixed-methods study of quality differences between applied documentation approaches in nursing homes Larjow, Eugenia von Fintel, Madlen Busse, Annette BMC Nurs Research BACKGROUND: Several approaches to nursing documentation exist. Some address standardised terminology and daily monitoring, whereas the structural model approach focuses on open-ended text information and special incidents. This study aims to identify quality differences between available documentation approaches from the perspectives of nursing professionals in Germany. METHODS: Between October 2018 and May 2019, a convenience sample of German nursing home practitioners was surveyed concerning the quality of their documentation techniques. The quality measurement was developed from the findings of a literature review on indicators that define successful nursing documentation. Selected indicators were structured according to Donabedian’s quality dimensions of structure, process, and outcome. A mean score was calculated for each quality dimension. Non-parametric tests were employed to discover whether organisational and person-related conditions affect score values. The framework method was used to analyse textual data. RESULTS: Responses from 250 nursing care practitioners show significant differences between users of different documentation approaches in the outcome dimension. Nurses who worked with the structural model were slightly more satisfied with their documentation approach than users of other approaches. In addition, differences between subgroups were identified depending on the mode of the tools employed for nursing documentation, participation in training, and length of time spent using the present documentation tool. Qualitative data reveal that digitalisation, unequal task distribution, and appreciation and motivation are critical topics in nursing homes. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that regular opportunities to reflect on challenges in documentation activities might increase nurses’ perceptions of documentation as a valuable part of nursing care. Training might serve this purpose for users of non-structural model approaches. Regardless of the specific recording techniques employed, more investment in digital infrastructure is required. BioMed Central 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9520897/ /pubmed/36171628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01046-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Larjow, Eugenia von Fintel, Madlen Busse, Annette A mixed-methods study of quality differences between applied documentation approaches in nursing homes |
title | A mixed-methods study of quality differences between applied documentation approaches in nursing homes |
title_full | A mixed-methods study of quality differences between applied documentation approaches in nursing homes |
title_fullStr | A mixed-methods study of quality differences between applied documentation approaches in nursing homes |
title_full_unstemmed | A mixed-methods study of quality differences between applied documentation approaches in nursing homes |
title_short | A mixed-methods study of quality differences between applied documentation approaches in nursing homes |
title_sort | mixed-methods study of quality differences between applied documentation approaches in nursing homes |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36171628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01046-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT larjoweugenia amixedmethodsstudyofqualitydifferencesbetweenapplieddocumentationapproachesinnursinghomes AT vonfintelmadlen amixedmethodsstudyofqualitydifferencesbetweenapplieddocumentationapproachesinnursinghomes AT busseannette amixedmethodsstudyofqualitydifferencesbetweenapplieddocumentationapproachesinnursinghomes AT larjoweugenia mixedmethodsstudyofqualitydifferencesbetweenapplieddocumentationapproachesinnursinghomes AT vonfintelmadlen mixedmethodsstudyofqualitydifferencesbetweenapplieddocumentationapproachesinnursinghomes AT busseannette mixedmethodsstudyofqualitydifferencesbetweenapplieddocumentationapproachesinnursinghomes |