Cargando…
Assessing the psychometric performance of EQ-5D-5L in dementia: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: EQ-5D is widely used for valuing changes in quality of life for economic evaluation of interventions for people with dementia. There are concerns about EQ-5D-3L in terms of content validity, poor inter-rater agreement and reliability in the presence of cognitive impairment, but there is...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36171595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-022-02036-3 |
_version_ | 1784799734494396416 |
---|---|
author | Keetharuth, Anju D. Hussain, Hannah Rowen, Donna Wailoo, Allan |
author_facet | Keetharuth, Anju D. Hussain, Hannah Rowen, Donna Wailoo, Allan |
author_sort | Keetharuth, Anju D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: EQ-5D is widely used for valuing changes in quality of life for economic evaluation of interventions for people with dementia. There are concerns about EQ-5D-3L in terms of content validity, poor inter-rater agreement and reliability in the presence of cognitive impairment, but there is also evidence to support its use with this population. An evidence gap remains regarding the psychometric properties of EQ-5D-5L. OBJECTIVES: To report psychometric evidence around EQ-5D-5L in people with dementia. METHODS: A systematic review identified primary studies reporting psychometric properties of EQ-5D-5L in people with dementia. Searches were completed up to November 2020. Study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were undertaken independently by at least 2 researchers. RESULTS: Evidence was extracted from 20 articles from 14 unique studies covering a range of dementia severity. Evidence of known group validity from 5 of 7 studies indicated that EQ-5D-5L distinguishes severity of disease measured by cognitive impairment, depression, level of dependence and pain. Convergent validity (9 studies) showed statistically significant correlations of weak and moderate strengths, between EQ-5D-5L scores and scores on other key measures. Statistically significant change was observed in only one of 6 papers that allowed this property to be examined. All seven studies showed a lack of inter-rater reliability between self and proxy reports with the former reporting higher EQ-5D-5L scores than those provided by proxies. Five of ten studies found EQ-5D-5L to be acceptable, assessed by whether the measure could be completed by the PwD and/or by the amount of missing data. As dementia severity increased, the feasibility of self-completing EQ-5D-5L decreased. Three papers reported on ceiling effects, two found some evidence in support of ceiling effects, and one did not. CONCLUSIONS: EQ-5D-5L seems to capture the health of people with dementia on the basis of known-group validity and convergent validity, but evidence is inconclusive regarding the responsiveness of EQ-5D-5L. As disease progresses, the ability to self-complete EQ-5D-5L is diminished. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12955-022-02036-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9520934 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95209342022-09-30 Assessing the psychometric performance of EQ-5D-5L in dementia: a systematic review Keetharuth, Anju D. Hussain, Hannah Rowen, Donna Wailoo, Allan Health Qual Life Outcomes Review BACKGROUND: EQ-5D is widely used for valuing changes in quality of life for economic evaluation of interventions for people with dementia. There are concerns about EQ-5D-3L in terms of content validity, poor inter-rater agreement and reliability in the presence of cognitive impairment, but there is also evidence to support its use with this population. An evidence gap remains regarding the psychometric properties of EQ-5D-5L. OBJECTIVES: To report psychometric evidence around EQ-5D-5L in people with dementia. METHODS: A systematic review identified primary studies reporting psychometric properties of EQ-5D-5L in people with dementia. Searches were completed up to November 2020. Study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were undertaken independently by at least 2 researchers. RESULTS: Evidence was extracted from 20 articles from 14 unique studies covering a range of dementia severity. Evidence of known group validity from 5 of 7 studies indicated that EQ-5D-5L distinguishes severity of disease measured by cognitive impairment, depression, level of dependence and pain. Convergent validity (9 studies) showed statistically significant correlations of weak and moderate strengths, between EQ-5D-5L scores and scores on other key measures. Statistically significant change was observed in only one of 6 papers that allowed this property to be examined. All seven studies showed a lack of inter-rater reliability between self and proxy reports with the former reporting higher EQ-5D-5L scores than those provided by proxies. Five of ten studies found EQ-5D-5L to be acceptable, assessed by whether the measure could be completed by the PwD and/or by the amount of missing data. As dementia severity increased, the feasibility of self-completing EQ-5D-5L decreased. Three papers reported on ceiling effects, two found some evidence in support of ceiling effects, and one did not. CONCLUSIONS: EQ-5D-5L seems to capture the health of people with dementia on the basis of known-group validity and convergent validity, but evidence is inconclusive regarding the responsiveness of EQ-5D-5L. As disease progresses, the ability to self-complete EQ-5D-5L is diminished. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12955-022-02036-3. BioMed Central 2022-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9520934/ /pubmed/36171595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-022-02036-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Keetharuth, Anju D. Hussain, Hannah Rowen, Donna Wailoo, Allan Assessing the psychometric performance of EQ-5D-5L in dementia: a systematic review |
title | Assessing the psychometric performance of EQ-5D-5L in dementia: a systematic review |
title_full | Assessing the psychometric performance of EQ-5D-5L in dementia: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Assessing the psychometric performance of EQ-5D-5L in dementia: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the psychometric performance of EQ-5D-5L in dementia: a systematic review |
title_short | Assessing the psychometric performance of EQ-5D-5L in dementia: a systematic review |
title_sort | assessing the psychometric performance of eq-5d-5l in dementia: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36171595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-022-02036-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT keetharuthanjud assessingthepsychometricperformanceofeq5d5lindementiaasystematicreview AT hussainhannah assessingthepsychometricperformanceofeq5d5lindementiaasystematicreview AT rowendonna assessingthepsychometricperformanceofeq5d5lindementiaasystematicreview AT wailooallan assessingthepsychometricperformanceofeq5d5lindementiaasystematicreview |