Cargando…

Validating ORR and PFS as surrogate endpoints in phase II and III clinical trials for NSCLC patients: difference exists in the strength of surrogacy in various trial settings

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to systematically validate the performance of surrogate endpoints in phase II and III clinical trials for NSCLC patients under various trial settings. METHODS: A literature search retrieved all registered phase II and III trials of NSCLC patients in which OS, with at least...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hua, Tiantian, Gao, Yuan, Zhang, Ruyang, Wei, Yongyue, Chen, Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36171546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10046-z
_version_ 1784799738598522880
author Hua, Tiantian
Gao, Yuan
Zhang, Ruyang
Wei, Yongyue
Chen, Feng
author_facet Hua, Tiantian
Gao, Yuan
Zhang, Ruyang
Wei, Yongyue
Chen, Feng
author_sort Hua, Tiantian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aims to systematically validate the performance of surrogate endpoints in phase II and III clinical trials for NSCLC patients under various trial settings. METHODS: A literature search retrieved all registered phase II and III trials of NSCLC patients in which OS, with at least one of ORR and PFS, were reported. Associations between surrogate and true endpoints were assessed on two levels. On the arm level, three pairs of correlations, i.e., ORR vs. median OS, ORR vs. median PFS, and median PFS vs. median OS, were analysed using Spearman’s rho. On the trial level, similarly, three pairs of correlations, i.e., ΔORR vs. HR of OS, ΔORR vs. HR of PFS, and HR of PFS vs. HR of OS, were analysed using Spearman’s rho and weighted linear regression model respectively. Finally, sensitivity analyses were performed to explore surrogacy under various trial settings. RESULTS: At arm level, three pairs of correlations are all high (Spearman’s rho = 0.700, 0.831, 0.755, respectively). At trial level, there is a low correlation between ΔORR and HR of OS, a high correlation between ΔORR and HR of PFS and a moderate correlation between HR of PFS and HR of OS (Spearman’s rho = 0.462, 0.764, 0.584, respectively). In the sensitivity analysis, we find correlations between surrogate and true endpoints vary by different trial settings. It is noteworthy that the strength of surrogacy of these intermediate endpoints in targeted therapy is greater than that in immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: According to the arm-level and trial level-analysis, we suggest that in phase II and III trials of targeted therapy and immunotherapy for NSCLC patients: 1) ORR lacks validity for the surrogacy of OS, excluding in first-line therapy, and 2) ORR may be an appropriate surrogate endpoint for PFS, and 3) PFS may be considered a modest surrogacy for OS, with better performance in first-line therapy trials. Moreover, to provide more convincing evidence of surrogacy of the surrogate endpoints, patient-level analyses are in desperate need. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10046-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9520950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95209502022-09-30 Validating ORR and PFS as surrogate endpoints in phase II and III clinical trials for NSCLC patients: difference exists in the strength of surrogacy in various trial settings Hua, Tiantian Gao, Yuan Zhang, Ruyang Wei, Yongyue Chen, Feng BMC Cancer Research OBJECTIVE: This study aims to systematically validate the performance of surrogate endpoints in phase II and III clinical trials for NSCLC patients under various trial settings. METHODS: A literature search retrieved all registered phase II and III trials of NSCLC patients in which OS, with at least one of ORR and PFS, were reported. Associations between surrogate and true endpoints were assessed on two levels. On the arm level, three pairs of correlations, i.e., ORR vs. median OS, ORR vs. median PFS, and median PFS vs. median OS, were analysed using Spearman’s rho. On the trial level, similarly, three pairs of correlations, i.e., ΔORR vs. HR of OS, ΔORR vs. HR of PFS, and HR of PFS vs. HR of OS, were analysed using Spearman’s rho and weighted linear regression model respectively. Finally, sensitivity analyses were performed to explore surrogacy under various trial settings. RESULTS: At arm level, three pairs of correlations are all high (Spearman’s rho = 0.700, 0.831, 0.755, respectively). At trial level, there is a low correlation between ΔORR and HR of OS, a high correlation between ΔORR and HR of PFS and a moderate correlation between HR of PFS and HR of OS (Spearman’s rho = 0.462, 0.764, 0.584, respectively). In the sensitivity analysis, we find correlations between surrogate and true endpoints vary by different trial settings. It is noteworthy that the strength of surrogacy of these intermediate endpoints in targeted therapy is greater than that in immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: According to the arm-level and trial level-analysis, we suggest that in phase II and III trials of targeted therapy and immunotherapy for NSCLC patients: 1) ORR lacks validity for the surrogacy of OS, excluding in first-line therapy, and 2) ORR may be an appropriate surrogate endpoint for PFS, and 3) PFS may be considered a modest surrogacy for OS, with better performance in first-line therapy trials. Moreover, to provide more convincing evidence of surrogacy of the surrogate endpoints, patient-level analyses are in desperate need. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10046-z. BioMed Central 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9520950/ /pubmed/36171546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10046-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hua, Tiantian
Gao, Yuan
Zhang, Ruyang
Wei, Yongyue
Chen, Feng
Validating ORR and PFS as surrogate endpoints in phase II and III clinical trials for NSCLC patients: difference exists in the strength of surrogacy in various trial settings
title Validating ORR and PFS as surrogate endpoints in phase II and III clinical trials for NSCLC patients: difference exists in the strength of surrogacy in various trial settings
title_full Validating ORR and PFS as surrogate endpoints in phase II and III clinical trials for NSCLC patients: difference exists in the strength of surrogacy in various trial settings
title_fullStr Validating ORR and PFS as surrogate endpoints in phase II and III clinical trials for NSCLC patients: difference exists in the strength of surrogacy in various trial settings
title_full_unstemmed Validating ORR and PFS as surrogate endpoints in phase II and III clinical trials for NSCLC patients: difference exists in the strength of surrogacy in various trial settings
title_short Validating ORR and PFS as surrogate endpoints in phase II and III clinical trials for NSCLC patients: difference exists in the strength of surrogacy in various trial settings
title_sort validating orr and pfs as surrogate endpoints in phase ii and iii clinical trials for nsclc patients: difference exists in the strength of surrogacy in various trial settings
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36171546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10046-z
work_keys_str_mv AT huatiantian validatingorrandpfsassurrogateendpointsinphaseiiandiiiclinicaltrialsfornsclcpatientsdifferenceexistsinthestrengthofsurrogacyinvarioustrialsettings
AT gaoyuan validatingorrandpfsassurrogateendpointsinphaseiiandiiiclinicaltrialsfornsclcpatientsdifferenceexistsinthestrengthofsurrogacyinvarioustrialsettings
AT zhangruyang validatingorrandpfsassurrogateendpointsinphaseiiandiiiclinicaltrialsfornsclcpatientsdifferenceexistsinthestrengthofsurrogacyinvarioustrialsettings
AT weiyongyue validatingorrandpfsassurrogateendpointsinphaseiiandiiiclinicaltrialsfornsclcpatientsdifferenceexistsinthestrengthofsurrogacyinvarioustrialsettings
AT chenfeng validatingorrandpfsassurrogateendpointsinphaseiiandiiiclinicaltrialsfornsclcpatientsdifferenceexistsinthestrengthofsurrogacyinvarioustrialsettings