Cargando…

Final analysis of the phase III non-inferiority COLUMBA study of subcutaneous versus intravenous daratumumab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

In the primary analysis of the phase III COLUMBA study, daratumumab by subcutaneous administration (DARA SC) demonstrated non-inferiority to intravenous administration (DARA IV) for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Here, we report the final analysis of efficacy and safety from COLUMBA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Usmani, Saad Z., Nahi, Hareth, Legiec, Wojciech, Grosicki, Sebastian, Vorobyev, Vladimir, Spicka, Ivan, Hungria, Vania, Korenkova, Sibirina, Bahlis, Nizar J., Flogegard, Max, Bladé, Joan, Moreau, Philippe, Kaiser, Martin, Iida, Shinsuke, Laubach, Jacob, Magen, Hila, Cavo, Michele, Hulin, Cyrille, White, Darrell, De Stefano, Valerio, Lantz, Kristen, O’Rourke, Lisa, Heuck, Christoph, Delioukina, Maria, Qin, Xiang, Nnane, Ivo, Qi, Ming, Mateos, Maria-Victoria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Fondazione Ferrata Storti 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9521240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35354247
http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2021.279459
_version_ 1784799799551197184
author Usmani, Saad Z.
Nahi, Hareth
Legiec, Wojciech
Grosicki, Sebastian
Vorobyev, Vladimir
Spicka, Ivan
Hungria, Vania
Korenkova, Sibirina
Bahlis, Nizar J.
Flogegard, Max
Bladé, Joan
Moreau, Philippe
Kaiser, Martin
Iida, Shinsuke
Laubach, Jacob
Magen, Hila
Cavo, Michele
Hulin, Cyrille
White, Darrell
De Stefano, Valerio
Lantz, Kristen
O’Rourke, Lisa
Heuck, Christoph
Delioukina, Maria
Qin, Xiang
Nnane, Ivo
Qi, Ming
Mateos, Maria-Victoria
author_facet Usmani, Saad Z.
Nahi, Hareth
Legiec, Wojciech
Grosicki, Sebastian
Vorobyev, Vladimir
Spicka, Ivan
Hungria, Vania
Korenkova, Sibirina
Bahlis, Nizar J.
Flogegard, Max
Bladé, Joan
Moreau, Philippe
Kaiser, Martin
Iida, Shinsuke
Laubach, Jacob
Magen, Hila
Cavo, Michele
Hulin, Cyrille
White, Darrell
De Stefano, Valerio
Lantz, Kristen
O’Rourke, Lisa
Heuck, Christoph
Delioukina, Maria
Qin, Xiang
Nnane, Ivo
Qi, Ming
Mateos, Maria-Victoria
author_sort Usmani, Saad Z.
collection PubMed
description In the primary analysis of the phase III COLUMBA study, daratumumab by subcutaneous administration (DARA SC) demonstrated non-inferiority to intravenous administration (DARA IV) for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Here, we report the final analysis of efficacy and safety from COLUMBA after a median of 29.3 months follow-up (additional 21.8 months after the primary analysis). In total, 522 patients were randomized (DARA SC, n=263; DARA IV, n=259). With longer follow-up, DARA SC and DARA IV continued to show consistent efficacy and maximum trough daratumumab concentration as compared with the primary analysis. The overall response rate was 43.7% for DARA SC and 39.8% for DARA IV. The maximum mean (standard deviation [SD]) trough concentration (cycle 3, day 1 pre-dose) of serum DARA was 581 (SD, 315) µg/mL for DARA SC and 496 (SD, 231) µg/mL for DARA IV. Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months for DARA SC and 6.1 months for DARA IV; median overall survival was 28.2 months and 25.6 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 50.8% of patients in the DARA SC group and 52.7% in the DARA IV group; the most common (≥10%) were thrombocytopenia (DARA SC, 14.2%; DARA IV, 13.6%), anemia (13.8%; 15.1%), and neutropenia (13.1%; 7.8%). The safety profile remained consistent with the primary analysis after longer follow-up. In summary, DARA SC and DARA IV continue to demonstrate similar efficacy and safety, with a low rate of infusion-related reactions (12.7% vs. 34.5%, respectively) and shorter administration time (3-5 minutes vs. 3-7 hours) supporting DARA SC as a preferable therapeutic choice. (Clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT03277105.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9521240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Fondazione Ferrata Storti
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95212402022-10-24 Final analysis of the phase III non-inferiority COLUMBA study of subcutaneous versus intravenous daratumumab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma Usmani, Saad Z. Nahi, Hareth Legiec, Wojciech Grosicki, Sebastian Vorobyev, Vladimir Spicka, Ivan Hungria, Vania Korenkova, Sibirina Bahlis, Nizar J. Flogegard, Max Bladé, Joan Moreau, Philippe Kaiser, Martin Iida, Shinsuke Laubach, Jacob Magen, Hila Cavo, Michele Hulin, Cyrille White, Darrell De Stefano, Valerio Lantz, Kristen O’Rourke, Lisa Heuck, Christoph Delioukina, Maria Qin, Xiang Nnane, Ivo Qi, Ming Mateos, Maria-Victoria Haematologica Article - Multiple Myeloma In the primary analysis of the phase III COLUMBA study, daratumumab by subcutaneous administration (DARA SC) demonstrated non-inferiority to intravenous administration (DARA IV) for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Here, we report the final analysis of efficacy and safety from COLUMBA after a median of 29.3 months follow-up (additional 21.8 months after the primary analysis). In total, 522 patients were randomized (DARA SC, n=263; DARA IV, n=259). With longer follow-up, DARA SC and DARA IV continued to show consistent efficacy and maximum trough daratumumab concentration as compared with the primary analysis. The overall response rate was 43.7% for DARA SC and 39.8% for DARA IV. The maximum mean (standard deviation [SD]) trough concentration (cycle 3, day 1 pre-dose) of serum DARA was 581 (SD, 315) µg/mL for DARA SC and 496 (SD, 231) µg/mL for DARA IV. Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months for DARA SC and 6.1 months for DARA IV; median overall survival was 28.2 months and 25.6 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 50.8% of patients in the DARA SC group and 52.7% in the DARA IV group; the most common (≥10%) were thrombocytopenia (DARA SC, 14.2%; DARA IV, 13.6%), anemia (13.8%; 15.1%), and neutropenia (13.1%; 7.8%). The safety profile remained consistent with the primary analysis after longer follow-up. In summary, DARA SC and DARA IV continue to demonstrate similar efficacy and safety, with a low rate of infusion-related reactions (12.7% vs. 34.5%, respectively) and shorter administration time (3-5 minutes vs. 3-7 hours) supporting DARA SC as a preferable therapeutic choice. (Clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT03277105. Fondazione Ferrata Storti 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9521240/ /pubmed/35354247 http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2021.279459 Text en Copyright© 2022 Ferrata Storti Foundation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (by-nc 4.0) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article - Multiple Myeloma
Usmani, Saad Z.
Nahi, Hareth
Legiec, Wojciech
Grosicki, Sebastian
Vorobyev, Vladimir
Spicka, Ivan
Hungria, Vania
Korenkova, Sibirina
Bahlis, Nizar J.
Flogegard, Max
Bladé, Joan
Moreau, Philippe
Kaiser, Martin
Iida, Shinsuke
Laubach, Jacob
Magen, Hila
Cavo, Michele
Hulin, Cyrille
White, Darrell
De Stefano, Valerio
Lantz, Kristen
O’Rourke, Lisa
Heuck, Christoph
Delioukina, Maria
Qin, Xiang
Nnane, Ivo
Qi, Ming
Mateos, Maria-Victoria
Final analysis of the phase III non-inferiority COLUMBA study of subcutaneous versus intravenous daratumumab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
title Final analysis of the phase III non-inferiority COLUMBA study of subcutaneous versus intravenous daratumumab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
title_full Final analysis of the phase III non-inferiority COLUMBA study of subcutaneous versus intravenous daratumumab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
title_fullStr Final analysis of the phase III non-inferiority COLUMBA study of subcutaneous versus intravenous daratumumab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
title_full_unstemmed Final analysis of the phase III non-inferiority COLUMBA study of subcutaneous versus intravenous daratumumab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
title_short Final analysis of the phase III non-inferiority COLUMBA study of subcutaneous versus intravenous daratumumab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
title_sort final analysis of the phase iii non-inferiority columba study of subcutaneous versus intravenous daratumumab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
topic Article - Multiple Myeloma
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9521240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35354247
http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2021.279459
work_keys_str_mv AT usmanisaadz finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT nahihareth finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT legiecwojciech finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT grosickisebastian finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT vorobyevvladimir finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT spickaivan finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT hungriavania finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT korenkovasibirina finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT bahlisnizarj finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT flogegardmax finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT bladejoan finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT moreauphilippe finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT kaisermartin finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT iidashinsuke finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT laubachjacob finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT magenhila finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT cavomichele finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT hulincyrille finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT whitedarrell finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT destefanovalerio finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT lantzkristen finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT orourkelisa finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT heuckchristoph finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT delioukinamaria finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT qinxiang finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT nnaneivo finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT qiming finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT mateosmariavictoria finalanalysisofthephaseiiinoninferioritycolumbastudyofsubcutaneousversusintravenousdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma