Cargando…
Comparison of epidemiological characteristics and transmissibility of different strains of COVID-19 based on the incidence data of all local outbreaks in China as of March 1, 2022
BACKGROUND: The epidemiological characteristics and transmissibility of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) may undergo changes due to the mutation of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) strains. The purpose of this study is to compare the differences in the outbreaks of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9521362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36187650 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.949594 |
_version_ | 1784799821742211072 |
---|---|
author | Niu, Yan Luo, Li Yang, Shiting Abudurusuli, Guzainuer Wang, Xiaoye Zhao, Zeyu Rui, Jia Li, Zhuoyang Deng, Bin Liu, Weikang Zhang, Zhe Li, Kangguo Liu, Chan Li, Peihua Huang, Jiefeng Yang, Tianlong Wang, Yao Chen, Tianmu Li, Qun |
author_facet | Niu, Yan Luo, Li Yang, Shiting Abudurusuli, Guzainuer Wang, Xiaoye Zhao, Zeyu Rui, Jia Li, Zhuoyang Deng, Bin Liu, Weikang Zhang, Zhe Li, Kangguo Liu, Chan Li, Peihua Huang, Jiefeng Yang, Tianlong Wang, Yao Chen, Tianmu Li, Qun |
author_sort | Niu, Yan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The epidemiological characteristics and transmissibility of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) may undergo changes due to the mutation of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) strains. The purpose of this study is to compare the differences in the outbreaks of the different strains with regards to aspects such as epidemiological characteristics, transmissibility, and difficulties in prevention and control. METHODS: COVID-19 data from outbreaks of pre-Delta strains, the Delta variant and Omicron variant, were obtained from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Case data were collected from China's direct-reporting system, and the data concerning outbreaks were collected by on-site epidemiological investigators and collated by the authors of this paper. Indicators such as the effective reproduction number (R(eff)), time-dependent reproduction number (R(t)), rate of decrease in transmissibility (RDT), and duration from the illness onset date to the diagnosed date (D(ID))/reported date (D(IR)) were used to compare differences in transmissibility between pre-Delta strains, Delta variants and Omicron variants. Non-parametric tests (namely the Kruskal-Wallis H and Mean-Whitney U tests) were used to compare differences in epidemiological characteristics and transmissibility between outbreaks of different strains. P < 0.05 indicated that the difference was statistically significant. RESULTS: Mainland China has maintained a “dynamic zero-out strategy” since the first case was reported, and clusters of outbreaks have occurred intermittently. The strains causing outbreaks in mainland China have gone through three stages: the outbreak of pre-Delta strains, the outbreak of the Delta variant, and outbreaks involving the superposition of Delta and Omicron variant strains. Each outbreak of pre-Delta strains went through two stages: a rising stage and a falling stage, Each outbreak of the Delta variant and Omicron variant went through three stages: a rising stage, a platform stage and a falling stage. The maximum R(eff) value of Omicron variant outbreaks was highest (median: 6.7; ranged from 5.3 to 8.0) and the differences were statistically significant. The RDT value of outbreaks involving pre-Delta strains was smallest (median: 91.4%; [IQR]: 87.30–94.27%), and the differences were statistically significant. The D(ID) and D(IR) for all strains was mostly in a range of 0–2 days, with more than 75%. The range of duration for outbreaks of pre-Delta strains was the largest (median: 20 days, ranging from 1 to 61 days), and the differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: With the evolution of the virus, the transmissibility of the variants has increased. The transmissibility of the Omicron variant is higher than that of both the pre-Delta strains and the Delta variant, and is more difficult to suppress. These findings provide us with get a more clear and precise picture of the transmissibility of the different variants in the real world, in accordance with the findings of previous studies. R(eff) is more suitable than R(t) for assessing the transmissibility of the disease during an epidemic outbreak. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9521362 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95213622022-09-30 Comparison of epidemiological characteristics and transmissibility of different strains of COVID-19 based on the incidence data of all local outbreaks in China as of March 1, 2022 Niu, Yan Luo, Li Yang, Shiting Abudurusuli, Guzainuer Wang, Xiaoye Zhao, Zeyu Rui, Jia Li, Zhuoyang Deng, Bin Liu, Weikang Zhang, Zhe Li, Kangguo Liu, Chan Li, Peihua Huang, Jiefeng Yang, Tianlong Wang, Yao Chen, Tianmu Li, Qun Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: The epidemiological characteristics and transmissibility of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) may undergo changes due to the mutation of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) strains. The purpose of this study is to compare the differences in the outbreaks of the different strains with regards to aspects such as epidemiological characteristics, transmissibility, and difficulties in prevention and control. METHODS: COVID-19 data from outbreaks of pre-Delta strains, the Delta variant and Omicron variant, were obtained from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Case data were collected from China's direct-reporting system, and the data concerning outbreaks were collected by on-site epidemiological investigators and collated by the authors of this paper. Indicators such as the effective reproduction number (R(eff)), time-dependent reproduction number (R(t)), rate of decrease in transmissibility (RDT), and duration from the illness onset date to the diagnosed date (D(ID))/reported date (D(IR)) were used to compare differences in transmissibility between pre-Delta strains, Delta variants and Omicron variants. Non-parametric tests (namely the Kruskal-Wallis H and Mean-Whitney U tests) were used to compare differences in epidemiological characteristics and transmissibility between outbreaks of different strains. P < 0.05 indicated that the difference was statistically significant. RESULTS: Mainland China has maintained a “dynamic zero-out strategy” since the first case was reported, and clusters of outbreaks have occurred intermittently. The strains causing outbreaks in mainland China have gone through three stages: the outbreak of pre-Delta strains, the outbreak of the Delta variant, and outbreaks involving the superposition of Delta and Omicron variant strains. Each outbreak of pre-Delta strains went through two stages: a rising stage and a falling stage, Each outbreak of the Delta variant and Omicron variant went through three stages: a rising stage, a platform stage and a falling stage. The maximum R(eff) value of Omicron variant outbreaks was highest (median: 6.7; ranged from 5.3 to 8.0) and the differences were statistically significant. The RDT value of outbreaks involving pre-Delta strains was smallest (median: 91.4%; [IQR]: 87.30–94.27%), and the differences were statistically significant. The D(ID) and D(IR) for all strains was mostly in a range of 0–2 days, with more than 75%. The range of duration for outbreaks of pre-Delta strains was the largest (median: 20 days, ranging from 1 to 61 days), and the differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: With the evolution of the virus, the transmissibility of the variants has increased. The transmissibility of the Omicron variant is higher than that of both the pre-Delta strains and the Delta variant, and is more difficult to suppress. These findings provide us with get a more clear and precise picture of the transmissibility of the different variants in the real world, in accordance with the findings of previous studies. R(eff) is more suitable than R(t) for assessing the transmissibility of the disease during an epidemic outbreak. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9521362/ /pubmed/36187650 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.949594 Text en Copyright © 2022 Niu, Luo, Yang, Abudurusuli, Wang, Zhao, Rui, Li, Deng, Liu, Zhang, Li, Liu, Li, Huang, Yang, Wang, Chen and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Niu, Yan Luo, Li Yang, Shiting Abudurusuli, Guzainuer Wang, Xiaoye Zhao, Zeyu Rui, Jia Li, Zhuoyang Deng, Bin Liu, Weikang Zhang, Zhe Li, Kangguo Liu, Chan Li, Peihua Huang, Jiefeng Yang, Tianlong Wang, Yao Chen, Tianmu Li, Qun Comparison of epidemiological characteristics and transmissibility of different strains of COVID-19 based on the incidence data of all local outbreaks in China as of March 1, 2022 |
title | Comparison of epidemiological characteristics and transmissibility of different strains of COVID-19 based on the incidence data of all local outbreaks in China as of March 1, 2022 |
title_full | Comparison of epidemiological characteristics and transmissibility of different strains of COVID-19 based on the incidence data of all local outbreaks in China as of March 1, 2022 |
title_fullStr | Comparison of epidemiological characteristics and transmissibility of different strains of COVID-19 based on the incidence data of all local outbreaks in China as of March 1, 2022 |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of epidemiological characteristics and transmissibility of different strains of COVID-19 based on the incidence data of all local outbreaks in China as of March 1, 2022 |
title_short | Comparison of epidemiological characteristics and transmissibility of different strains of COVID-19 based on the incidence data of all local outbreaks in China as of March 1, 2022 |
title_sort | comparison of epidemiological characteristics and transmissibility of different strains of covid-19 based on the incidence data of all local outbreaks in china as of march 1, 2022 |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9521362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36187650 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.949594 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT niuyan comparisonofepidemiologicalcharacteristicsandtransmissibilityofdifferentstrainsofcovid19basedontheincidencedataofalllocaloutbreaksinchinaasofmarch12022 AT luoli comparisonofepidemiologicalcharacteristicsandtransmissibilityofdifferentstrainsofcovid19basedontheincidencedataofalllocaloutbreaksinchinaasofmarch12022 AT yangshiting comparisonofepidemiologicalcharacteristicsandtransmissibilityofdifferentstrainsofcovid19basedontheincidencedataofalllocaloutbreaksinchinaasofmarch12022 AT abudurusuliguzainuer comparisonofepidemiologicalcharacteristicsandtransmissibilityofdifferentstrainsofcovid19basedontheincidencedataofalllocaloutbreaksinchinaasofmarch12022 AT wangxiaoye comparisonofepidemiologicalcharacteristicsandtransmissibilityofdifferentstrainsofcovid19basedontheincidencedataofalllocaloutbreaksinchinaasofmarch12022 AT zhaozeyu comparisonofepidemiologicalcharacteristicsandtransmissibilityofdifferentstrainsofcovid19basedontheincidencedataofalllocaloutbreaksinchinaasofmarch12022 AT ruijia comparisonofepidemiologicalcharacteristicsandtransmissibilityofdifferentstrainsofcovid19basedontheincidencedataofalllocaloutbreaksinchinaasofmarch12022 AT lizhuoyang comparisonofepidemiologicalcharacteristicsandtransmissibilityofdifferentstrainsofcovid19basedontheincidencedataofalllocaloutbreaksinchinaasofmarch12022 AT dengbin comparisonofepidemiologicalcharacteristicsandtransmissibilityofdifferentstrainsofcovid19basedontheincidencedataofalllocaloutbreaksinchinaasofmarch12022 AT liuweikang comparisonofepidemiologicalcharacteristicsandtransmissibilityofdifferentstrainsofcovid19basedontheincidencedataofalllocaloutbreaksinchinaasofmarch12022 AT zhangzhe comparisonofepidemiologicalcharacteristicsandtransmissibilityofdifferentstrainsofcovid19basedontheincidencedataofalllocaloutbreaksinchinaasofmarch12022 AT likangguo comparisonofepidemiologicalcharacteristicsandtransmissibilityofdifferentstrainsofcovid19basedontheincidencedataofalllocaloutbreaksinchinaasofmarch12022 AT liuchan comparisonofepidemiologicalcharacteristicsandtransmissibilityofdifferentstrainsofcovid19basedontheincidencedataofalllocaloutbreaksinchinaasofmarch12022 AT lipeihua comparisonofepidemiologicalcharacteristicsandtransmissibilityofdifferentstrainsofcovid19basedontheincidencedataofalllocaloutbreaksinchinaasofmarch12022 AT huangjiefeng comparisonofepidemiologicalcharacteristicsandtransmissibilityofdifferentstrainsofcovid19basedontheincidencedataofalllocaloutbreaksinchinaasofmarch12022 AT yangtianlong comparisonofepidemiologicalcharacteristicsandtransmissibilityofdifferentstrainsofcovid19basedontheincidencedataofalllocaloutbreaksinchinaasofmarch12022 AT wangyao comparisonofepidemiologicalcharacteristicsandtransmissibilityofdifferentstrainsofcovid19basedontheincidencedataofalllocaloutbreaksinchinaasofmarch12022 AT chentianmu comparisonofepidemiologicalcharacteristicsandtransmissibilityofdifferentstrainsofcovid19basedontheincidencedataofalllocaloutbreaksinchinaasofmarch12022 AT liqun comparisonofepidemiologicalcharacteristicsandtransmissibilityofdifferentstrainsofcovid19basedontheincidencedataofalllocaloutbreaksinchinaasofmarch12022 |