Cargando…

Cost-utility analysis of lurasidone for the first-line treatment of schizophrenia in China

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of lurasidone compared with olanzapine and risperidone in the first-line treatment of patients with schizophrenia from a Chinese healthcare system perspective. METHODS: A Markov model with 6-week cycle was constructed to reflect the disease progression o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Jia, Cao, Lidan, Wu, Jing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9521600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36187655
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.987408
_version_ 1784799876675010560
author Liu, Jia
Cao, Lidan
Wu, Jing
author_facet Liu, Jia
Cao, Lidan
Wu, Jing
author_sort Liu, Jia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of lurasidone compared with olanzapine and risperidone in the first-line treatment of patients with schizophrenia from a Chinese healthcare system perspective. METHODS: A Markov model with 6-week cycle was constructed to reflect the disease progression of schizophrenia patients in the acute and maintenance phase. Probabilities of treatment discontinuation and adverse events in the acute phase were derived from the 6-week lurasidone clinical trial and a published network meta-analysis; long-term risks of relapse and discontinuation were estimated based on the 12-month lurasidone clinical trial and other treatment comparison studies. Cost inputs were derived from published literature and Chinese official documents, supplemented by expert opinions when necessary. Utility values were taken from published literature. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were assessed over 15 years with a discount rate of 5% per year. RESULTS: Over a 15-year time horizon, lurasidone yielded an improvement of 0.197 QALYs with a cost saving of CN¥12,093 (US$1,753) vs. olanzapine and an improvement of 0.116 QALYs with a cost saving of CN¥6,781 (US$983) vs. risperidone. One-way sensitivity analyses demonstrated robust base-case results since all analyses yielded net monetary benefits >0 at a willingness-to-pay threshold of CN¥72,447.00 (US$10,499.57)/QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses suggested that lurasidone had 99.7, 99.9, and 100% probability of being cost-effective vs. olanzapine and risperidone at the conventional decision thresholds of 1, 2, and 3 times the Chinese per capita gross domestic product [namely CN¥72,447.00 (US$10,499.57)/QALY, CN¥1,44,894.00 (US$20,999.13)/QALY, and CN¥2,17,341.00 (US$31,498.70)/QALY in 2020], respectively. CONCLUSION: Treatment with lurasidone was predicted to improve health outcomes and be a dominant strategy for patients with schizophrenia, compared with olanzapine and risperidone, in China.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9521600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95216002022-09-30 Cost-utility analysis of lurasidone for the first-line treatment of schizophrenia in China Liu, Jia Cao, Lidan Wu, Jing Front Public Health Public Health OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of lurasidone compared with olanzapine and risperidone in the first-line treatment of patients with schizophrenia from a Chinese healthcare system perspective. METHODS: A Markov model with 6-week cycle was constructed to reflect the disease progression of schizophrenia patients in the acute and maintenance phase. Probabilities of treatment discontinuation and adverse events in the acute phase were derived from the 6-week lurasidone clinical trial and a published network meta-analysis; long-term risks of relapse and discontinuation were estimated based on the 12-month lurasidone clinical trial and other treatment comparison studies. Cost inputs were derived from published literature and Chinese official documents, supplemented by expert opinions when necessary. Utility values were taken from published literature. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were assessed over 15 years with a discount rate of 5% per year. RESULTS: Over a 15-year time horizon, lurasidone yielded an improvement of 0.197 QALYs with a cost saving of CN¥12,093 (US$1,753) vs. olanzapine and an improvement of 0.116 QALYs with a cost saving of CN¥6,781 (US$983) vs. risperidone. One-way sensitivity analyses demonstrated robust base-case results since all analyses yielded net monetary benefits >0 at a willingness-to-pay threshold of CN¥72,447.00 (US$10,499.57)/QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses suggested that lurasidone had 99.7, 99.9, and 100% probability of being cost-effective vs. olanzapine and risperidone at the conventional decision thresholds of 1, 2, and 3 times the Chinese per capita gross domestic product [namely CN¥72,447.00 (US$10,499.57)/QALY, CN¥1,44,894.00 (US$20,999.13)/QALY, and CN¥2,17,341.00 (US$31,498.70)/QALY in 2020], respectively. CONCLUSION: Treatment with lurasidone was predicted to improve health outcomes and be a dominant strategy for patients with schizophrenia, compared with olanzapine and risperidone, in China. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9521600/ /pubmed/36187655 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.987408 Text en Copyright © 2022 Liu, Cao and Wu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Liu, Jia
Cao, Lidan
Wu, Jing
Cost-utility analysis of lurasidone for the first-line treatment of schizophrenia in China
title Cost-utility analysis of lurasidone for the first-line treatment of schizophrenia in China
title_full Cost-utility analysis of lurasidone for the first-line treatment of schizophrenia in China
title_fullStr Cost-utility analysis of lurasidone for the first-line treatment of schizophrenia in China
title_full_unstemmed Cost-utility analysis of lurasidone for the first-line treatment of schizophrenia in China
title_short Cost-utility analysis of lurasidone for the first-line treatment of schizophrenia in China
title_sort cost-utility analysis of lurasidone for the first-line treatment of schizophrenia in china
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9521600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36187655
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.987408
work_keys_str_mv AT liujia costutilityanalysisoflurasidoneforthefirstlinetreatmentofschizophreniainchina
AT caolidan costutilityanalysisoflurasidoneforthefirstlinetreatmentofschizophreniainchina
AT wujing costutilityanalysisoflurasidoneforthefirstlinetreatmentofschizophreniainchina