Cargando…

Automated Identification of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Targets: Multicenter Validation and Workflow Characterization

Decrement evoked potentials (EPs) (DeEPs) constitute an accepted method to identify physiological ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation targets without inducing VT. The feasibility of automated software (SW) in the detection of arrhythmogenic VT substrate has been documented. However, multicenter va...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niri, Ahmed, Shapira, Einat, Massé, Stéphane, Bar-Tal, Meir, Bar-on, Tal, Hayam, Gal, Ben-Dor, Amir, Bhaskaran, Abishek, Ha, Andrew, Anter, Elad, Porta-Sanchez, Andreu, Jackson, Nicholas, Nanthakumar, Kumaraswamy, Nair, Krishnakumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MediaSphere Medical 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9521725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36196238
http://dx.doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2022.130903
_version_ 1784799904219004928
author Niri, Ahmed
Shapira, Einat
Massé, Stéphane
Bar-Tal, Meir
Bar-on, Tal
Hayam, Gal
Ben-Dor, Amir
Bhaskaran, Abishek
Ha, Andrew
Anter, Elad
Porta-Sanchez, Andreu
Jackson, Nicholas
Nanthakumar, Kumaraswamy
Nair, Krishnakumar
author_facet Niri, Ahmed
Shapira, Einat
Massé, Stéphane
Bar-Tal, Meir
Bar-on, Tal
Hayam, Gal
Ben-Dor, Amir
Bhaskaran, Abishek
Ha, Andrew
Anter, Elad
Porta-Sanchez, Andreu
Jackson, Nicholas
Nanthakumar, Kumaraswamy
Nair, Krishnakumar
author_sort Niri, Ahmed
collection PubMed
description Decrement evoked potentials (EPs) (DeEPs) constitute an accepted method to identify physiological ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation targets without inducing VT. The feasibility of automated software (SW) in the detection of arrhythmogenic VT substrate has been documented. However, multicenter validation of automated SW and workflow has yet to be characterized. The objective of this study was to describe the functionality of a novel DeEP SW (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA) and evaluate the independent performance of the automated algorithm using multicenter data. VT ablation cases were performed in the catheterization laboratory and retrospectively analyzed using the DeEP SW. The algorithm indicated and mapped DeEPs by first identifying capture in surface electrocardiograms (ECGs). Once capture was confirmed, the EPs of S1 paces were detected. The algorithm checked for the stability of S1 EPs by comparing the last 3 of the 8 morphologies and attributing standard deviation values. The extra-stimulus EP was then detected by comparing it to the S1 EP. Once detected, the DeEP value was computed from the extra-stimulus and displayed as a sphere on a voltage map. A total of 5,885 DeEP signals were extracted from 21 substrate mapping cases conducted at 3 different centers (in Spain, Canada, and Australia). A gold standard was established from ECGs manually marked by subject experts. Once the algorithm was deployed, 91.6% of S2 algorithm markings coincided with the gold standard, 1.9% were false-positives, and 0.1% were false-negatives. Also, 6.4% were non-specific DeEP detections. In conclusion, the automated DeEP algorithm identifies and displays DeEP points, revealing VT substrates in a multicenter validation study. The automation of identification and mapping display is expected to improve efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9521725
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MediaSphere Medical
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95217252022-10-03 Automated Identification of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Targets: Multicenter Validation and Workflow Characterization Niri, Ahmed Shapira, Einat Massé, Stéphane Bar-Tal, Meir Bar-on, Tal Hayam, Gal Ben-Dor, Amir Bhaskaran, Abishek Ha, Andrew Anter, Elad Porta-Sanchez, Andreu Jackson, Nicholas Nanthakumar, Kumaraswamy Nair, Krishnakumar J Innov Card Rhythm Manag Original Research Decrement evoked potentials (EPs) (DeEPs) constitute an accepted method to identify physiological ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation targets without inducing VT. The feasibility of automated software (SW) in the detection of arrhythmogenic VT substrate has been documented. However, multicenter validation of automated SW and workflow has yet to be characterized. The objective of this study was to describe the functionality of a novel DeEP SW (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA) and evaluate the independent performance of the automated algorithm using multicenter data. VT ablation cases were performed in the catheterization laboratory and retrospectively analyzed using the DeEP SW. The algorithm indicated and mapped DeEPs by first identifying capture in surface electrocardiograms (ECGs). Once capture was confirmed, the EPs of S1 paces were detected. The algorithm checked for the stability of S1 EPs by comparing the last 3 of the 8 morphologies and attributing standard deviation values. The extra-stimulus EP was then detected by comparing it to the S1 EP. Once detected, the DeEP value was computed from the extra-stimulus and displayed as a sphere on a voltage map. A total of 5,885 DeEP signals were extracted from 21 substrate mapping cases conducted at 3 different centers (in Spain, Canada, and Australia). A gold standard was established from ECGs manually marked by subject experts. Once the algorithm was deployed, 91.6% of S2 algorithm markings coincided with the gold standard, 1.9% were false-positives, and 0.1% were false-negatives. Also, 6.4% were non-specific DeEP detections. In conclusion, the automated DeEP algorithm identifies and displays DeEP points, revealing VT substrates in a multicenter validation study. The automation of identification and mapping display is expected to improve efficiency. MediaSphere Medical 2022-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9521725/ /pubmed/36196238 http://dx.doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2022.130903 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Niri, Ahmed
Shapira, Einat
Massé, Stéphane
Bar-Tal, Meir
Bar-on, Tal
Hayam, Gal
Ben-Dor, Amir
Bhaskaran, Abishek
Ha, Andrew
Anter, Elad
Porta-Sanchez, Andreu
Jackson, Nicholas
Nanthakumar, Kumaraswamy
Nair, Krishnakumar
Automated Identification of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Targets: Multicenter Validation and Workflow Characterization
title Automated Identification of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Targets: Multicenter Validation and Workflow Characterization
title_full Automated Identification of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Targets: Multicenter Validation and Workflow Characterization
title_fullStr Automated Identification of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Targets: Multicenter Validation and Workflow Characterization
title_full_unstemmed Automated Identification of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Targets: Multicenter Validation and Workflow Characterization
title_short Automated Identification of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Targets: Multicenter Validation and Workflow Characterization
title_sort automated identification of ventricular tachycardia ablation targets: multicenter validation and workflow characterization
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9521725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36196238
http://dx.doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2022.130903
work_keys_str_mv AT niriahmed automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization
AT shapiraeinat automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization
AT massestephane automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization
AT bartalmeir automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization
AT barontal automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization
AT hayamgal automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization
AT bendoramir automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization
AT bhaskaranabishek automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization
AT haandrew automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization
AT anterelad automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization
AT portasanchezandreu automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization
AT jacksonnicholas automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization
AT nanthakumarkumaraswamy automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization
AT nairkrishnakumar automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization