Cargando…
Automated Identification of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Targets: Multicenter Validation and Workflow Characterization
Decrement evoked potentials (EPs) (DeEPs) constitute an accepted method to identify physiological ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation targets without inducing VT. The feasibility of automated software (SW) in the detection of arrhythmogenic VT substrate has been documented. However, multicenter va...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MediaSphere Medical
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9521725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36196238 http://dx.doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2022.130903 |
_version_ | 1784799904219004928 |
---|---|
author | Niri, Ahmed Shapira, Einat Massé, Stéphane Bar-Tal, Meir Bar-on, Tal Hayam, Gal Ben-Dor, Amir Bhaskaran, Abishek Ha, Andrew Anter, Elad Porta-Sanchez, Andreu Jackson, Nicholas Nanthakumar, Kumaraswamy Nair, Krishnakumar |
author_facet | Niri, Ahmed Shapira, Einat Massé, Stéphane Bar-Tal, Meir Bar-on, Tal Hayam, Gal Ben-Dor, Amir Bhaskaran, Abishek Ha, Andrew Anter, Elad Porta-Sanchez, Andreu Jackson, Nicholas Nanthakumar, Kumaraswamy Nair, Krishnakumar |
author_sort | Niri, Ahmed |
collection | PubMed |
description | Decrement evoked potentials (EPs) (DeEPs) constitute an accepted method to identify physiological ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation targets without inducing VT. The feasibility of automated software (SW) in the detection of arrhythmogenic VT substrate has been documented. However, multicenter validation of automated SW and workflow has yet to be characterized. The objective of this study was to describe the functionality of a novel DeEP SW (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA) and evaluate the independent performance of the automated algorithm using multicenter data. VT ablation cases were performed in the catheterization laboratory and retrospectively analyzed using the DeEP SW. The algorithm indicated and mapped DeEPs by first identifying capture in surface electrocardiograms (ECGs). Once capture was confirmed, the EPs of S1 paces were detected. The algorithm checked for the stability of S1 EPs by comparing the last 3 of the 8 morphologies and attributing standard deviation values. The extra-stimulus EP was then detected by comparing it to the S1 EP. Once detected, the DeEP value was computed from the extra-stimulus and displayed as a sphere on a voltage map. A total of 5,885 DeEP signals were extracted from 21 substrate mapping cases conducted at 3 different centers (in Spain, Canada, and Australia). A gold standard was established from ECGs manually marked by subject experts. Once the algorithm was deployed, 91.6% of S2 algorithm markings coincided with the gold standard, 1.9% were false-positives, and 0.1% were false-negatives. Also, 6.4% were non-specific DeEP detections. In conclusion, the automated DeEP algorithm identifies and displays DeEP points, revealing VT substrates in a multicenter validation study. The automation of identification and mapping display is expected to improve efficiency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9521725 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MediaSphere Medical |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95217252022-10-03 Automated Identification of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Targets: Multicenter Validation and Workflow Characterization Niri, Ahmed Shapira, Einat Massé, Stéphane Bar-Tal, Meir Bar-on, Tal Hayam, Gal Ben-Dor, Amir Bhaskaran, Abishek Ha, Andrew Anter, Elad Porta-Sanchez, Andreu Jackson, Nicholas Nanthakumar, Kumaraswamy Nair, Krishnakumar J Innov Card Rhythm Manag Original Research Decrement evoked potentials (EPs) (DeEPs) constitute an accepted method to identify physiological ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation targets without inducing VT. The feasibility of automated software (SW) in the detection of arrhythmogenic VT substrate has been documented. However, multicenter validation of automated SW and workflow has yet to be characterized. The objective of this study was to describe the functionality of a novel DeEP SW (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA) and evaluate the independent performance of the automated algorithm using multicenter data. VT ablation cases were performed in the catheterization laboratory and retrospectively analyzed using the DeEP SW. The algorithm indicated and mapped DeEPs by first identifying capture in surface electrocardiograms (ECGs). Once capture was confirmed, the EPs of S1 paces were detected. The algorithm checked for the stability of S1 EPs by comparing the last 3 of the 8 morphologies and attributing standard deviation values. The extra-stimulus EP was then detected by comparing it to the S1 EP. Once detected, the DeEP value was computed from the extra-stimulus and displayed as a sphere on a voltage map. A total of 5,885 DeEP signals were extracted from 21 substrate mapping cases conducted at 3 different centers (in Spain, Canada, and Australia). A gold standard was established from ECGs manually marked by subject experts. Once the algorithm was deployed, 91.6% of S2 algorithm markings coincided with the gold standard, 1.9% were false-positives, and 0.1% were false-negatives. Also, 6.4% were non-specific DeEP detections. In conclusion, the automated DeEP algorithm identifies and displays DeEP points, revealing VT substrates in a multicenter validation study. The automation of identification and mapping display is expected to improve efficiency. MediaSphere Medical 2022-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9521725/ /pubmed/36196238 http://dx.doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2022.130903 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Niri, Ahmed Shapira, Einat Massé, Stéphane Bar-Tal, Meir Bar-on, Tal Hayam, Gal Ben-Dor, Amir Bhaskaran, Abishek Ha, Andrew Anter, Elad Porta-Sanchez, Andreu Jackson, Nicholas Nanthakumar, Kumaraswamy Nair, Krishnakumar Automated Identification of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Targets: Multicenter Validation and Workflow Characterization |
title | Automated Identification of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Targets: Multicenter Validation and Workflow Characterization |
title_full | Automated Identification of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Targets: Multicenter Validation and Workflow Characterization |
title_fullStr | Automated Identification of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Targets: Multicenter Validation and Workflow Characterization |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated Identification of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Targets: Multicenter Validation and Workflow Characterization |
title_short | Automated Identification of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Targets: Multicenter Validation and Workflow Characterization |
title_sort | automated identification of ventricular tachycardia ablation targets: multicenter validation and workflow characterization |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9521725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36196238 http://dx.doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2022.130903 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT niriahmed automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization AT shapiraeinat automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization AT massestephane automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization AT bartalmeir automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization AT barontal automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization AT hayamgal automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization AT bendoramir automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization AT bhaskaranabishek automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization AT haandrew automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization AT anterelad automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization AT portasanchezandreu automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization AT jacksonnicholas automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization AT nanthakumarkumaraswamy automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization AT nairkrishnakumar automatedidentificationofventriculartachycardiaablationtargetsmulticentervalidationandworkflowcharacterization |