PROTOCOL: Critical appraisal of methodological quality and reporting items of systematic reviews with meta‐analysis in evidence‐based social science in China: A systematic review

This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows: (1) To evaluate the reporting quality of systematic reviews published in Chinese social science journals against the PRISMA and MOOSE standards; (2) To evaluate the methodology quality of systematic reviews publish...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Liping, Zhou, Wenjie, Xing, Xin, Wei, Zhipeng, Yang, Minyan, Ma, Mina, Yang, Kehu, White, Howard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Protocol
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9521792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1278
_version_ 1784799919658237952
author Guo, Liping
Zhou, Wenjie
Xing, Xin
Wei, Zhipeng
Yang, Minyan
Ma, Mina
Yang, Kehu
White, Howard
author_facet Guo, Liping
Zhou, Wenjie
Xing, Xin
Wei, Zhipeng
Yang, Minyan
Ma, Mina
Yang, Kehu
White, Howard
author_sort Guo, Liping
collection PubMed
description This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows: (1) To evaluate the reporting quality of systematic reviews published in Chinese social science journals against the PRISMA and MOOSE standards; (2) To evaluate the methodology quality of systematic reviews published in Chinese social science journals against the AMSTAR‐2 and DART standards; and (3) To analyze other characteristics of systematic reviews published in Chinese social science journals using content analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9521792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95217922023-03-09 PROTOCOL: Critical appraisal of methodological quality and reporting items of systematic reviews with meta‐analysis in evidence‐based social science in China: A systematic review Guo, Liping Zhou, Wenjie Xing, Xin Wei, Zhipeng Yang, Minyan Ma, Mina Yang, Kehu White, Howard Campbell Syst Rev Protocol This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows: (1) To evaluate the reporting quality of systematic reviews published in Chinese social science journals against the PRISMA and MOOSE standards; (2) To evaluate the methodology quality of systematic reviews published in Chinese social science journals against the AMSTAR‐2 and DART standards; and (3) To analyze other characteristics of systematic reviews published in Chinese social science journals using content analysis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9521792/ /pubmed/36908832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1278 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Campbell Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Campbell Collaboration. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Protocol
Guo, Liping
Zhou, Wenjie
Xing, Xin
Wei, Zhipeng
Yang, Minyan
Ma, Mina
Yang, Kehu
White, Howard
PROTOCOL: Critical appraisal of methodological quality and reporting items of systematic reviews with meta‐analysis in evidence‐based social science in China: A systematic review
title PROTOCOL: Critical appraisal of methodological quality and reporting items of systematic reviews with meta‐analysis in evidence‐based social science in China: A systematic review
title_full PROTOCOL: Critical appraisal of methodological quality and reporting items of systematic reviews with meta‐analysis in evidence‐based social science in China: A systematic review
title_fullStr PROTOCOL: Critical appraisal of methodological quality and reporting items of systematic reviews with meta‐analysis in evidence‐based social science in China: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed PROTOCOL: Critical appraisal of methodological quality and reporting items of systematic reviews with meta‐analysis in evidence‐based social science in China: A systematic review
title_short PROTOCOL: Critical appraisal of methodological quality and reporting items of systematic reviews with meta‐analysis in evidence‐based social science in China: A systematic review
title_sort protocol: critical appraisal of methodological quality and reporting items of systematic reviews with meta‐analysis in evidence‐based social science in china: a systematic review
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9521792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1278
work_keys_str_mv AT guoliping protocolcriticalappraisalofmethodologicalqualityandreportingitemsofsystematicreviewswithmetaanalysisinevidencebasedsocialscienceinchinaasystematicreview
AT zhouwenjie protocolcriticalappraisalofmethodologicalqualityandreportingitemsofsystematicreviewswithmetaanalysisinevidencebasedsocialscienceinchinaasystematicreview
AT xingxin protocolcriticalappraisalofmethodologicalqualityandreportingitemsofsystematicreviewswithmetaanalysisinevidencebasedsocialscienceinchinaasystematicreview
AT weizhipeng protocolcriticalappraisalofmethodologicalqualityandreportingitemsofsystematicreviewswithmetaanalysisinevidencebasedsocialscienceinchinaasystematicreview
AT yangminyan protocolcriticalappraisalofmethodologicalqualityandreportingitemsofsystematicreviewswithmetaanalysisinevidencebasedsocialscienceinchinaasystematicreview
AT mamina protocolcriticalappraisalofmethodologicalqualityandreportingitemsofsystematicreviewswithmetaanalysisinevidencebasedsocialscienceinchinaasystematicreview
AT yangkehu protocolcriticalappraisalofmethodologicalqualityandreportingitemsofsystematicreviewswithmetaanalysisinevidencebasedsocialscienceinchinaasystematicreview
AT whitehoward protocolcriticalappraisalofmethodologicalqualityandreportingitemsofsystematicreviewswithmetaanalysisinevidencebasedsocialscienceinchinaasystematicreview

Ejemplares similares