Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety of Consecutive Use of 1% and 0.01% Atropine for Myopia Control in Chinese Children: The Atropine for Children and Adolescent Myopia Progression Study
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of consecutive use of 1% and 0.01% atropine compared with 0.01% atropine alone over 1 year. METHODS: A total of 207 participants aged 6–12 years with myopia of − 0.50 to − 6.00 D in both eyes were enrolled in this ran...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9521881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36175821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-022-00572-1 |
_version_ | 1784799940051992576 |
---|---|
author | Ye, Luyao Xu, Hannan Shi, Ya Yin, Yao Yu, Tao Peng, Yajun Li, Shanshan He, Jiangnan Zhu, Jianfeng Xu, Xun |
author_facet | Ye, Luyao Xu, Hannan Shi, Ya Yin, Yao Yu, Tao Peng, Yajun Li, Shanshan He, Jiangnan Zhu, Jianfeng Xu, Xun |
author_sort | Ye, Luyao |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of consecutive use of 1% and 0.01% atropine compared with 0.01% atropine alone over 1 year. METHODS: A total of 207 participants aged 6–12 years with myopia of − 0.50 to − 6.00 D in both eyes were enrolled in this randomized, controlled, non-masked trial and randomly assigned (1:1) to groups A and B. Group A received 1% atropine weekly and were tapered to 0.01% atropine daily at the 6-month visit, and group B received 0.01% atropine daily for 1 year. RESULTS: Of the 207 participants, 109 were female (52.7%) and the mean (± standard deviation) age was 8.92 ± 1.61 years. Ninety-one participants (87.5%) in group A and 80 participants (77.7%) in group B completed the 1-year treatment. Group A exhibited less refraction progression (− 0.53 ± 0.49 D vs. − 0.74 ± 0.52 D; P = 0.01) and axial elongation (0.26 ± 0.17 mm vs. 0.36 ± 0.21 mm; P < 0.001) over 1 year compared with group B. The changes in refraction (− 0.82 ± 0.45 D vs. − 0.46 ± 0.35 D; P < 0.001) and axial length (0.29 ± 0.12 mm vs. 0.17 ± 0.11 mm; P < 0.001) during the second 6 months in group A were greater than those in group B, with 72.5% of participants presenting refraction rebound. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The 1-year results preliminarily suggest that consecutive use of 1% and 0.01% atropine confers an overall better effect in slowing myopia progression than 0.01% atropine alone, despite myopia rebound after the concentration switch. Both regimens were well tolerated. The long-term efficacy and rebound after the concentration switch and regimen optimization warrant future studies to determine. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical Trials.gov PRS (Registration No. NCT03949101). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40123-022-00572-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9521881 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95218812022-09-30 Efficacy and Safety of Consecutive Use of 1% and 0.01% Atropine for Myopia Control in Chinese Children: The Atropine for Children and Adolescent Myopia Progression Study Ye, Luyao Xu, Hannan Shi, Ya Yin, Yao Yu, Tao Peng, Yajun Li, Shanshan He, Jiangnan Zhu, Jianfeng Xu, Xun Ophthalmol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of consecutive use of 1% and 0.01% atropine compared with 0.01% atropine alone over 1 year. METHODS: A total of 207 participants aged 6–12 years with myopia of − 0.50 to − 6.00 D in both eyes were enrolled in this randomized, controlled, non-masked trial and randomly assigned (1:1) to groups A and B. Group A received 1% atropine weekly and were tapered to 0.01% atropine daily at the 6-month visit, and group B received 0.01% atropine daily for 1 year. RESULTS: Of the 207 participants, 109 were female (52.7%) and the mean (± standard deviation) age was 8.92 ± 1.61 years. Ninety-one participants (87.5%) in group A and 80 participants (77.7%) in group B completed the 1-year treatment. Group A exhibited less refraction progression (− 0.53 ± 0.49 D vs. − 0.74 ± 0.52 D; P = 0.01) and axial elongation (0.26 ± 0.17 mm vs. 0.36 ± 0.21 mm; P < 0.001) over 1 year compared with group B. The changes in refraction (− 0.82 ± 0.45 D vs. − 0.46 ± 0.35 D; P < 0.001) and axial length (0.29 ± 0.12 mm vs. 0.17 ± 0.11 mm; P < 0.001) during the second 6 months in group A were greater than those in group B, with 72.5% of participants presenting refraction rebound. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The 1-year results preliminarily suggest that consecutive use of 1% and 0.01% atropine confers an overall better effect in slowing myopia progression than 0.01% atropine alone, despite myopia rebound after the concentration switch. Both regimens were well tolerated. The long-term efficacy and rebound after the concentration switch and regimen optimization warrant future studies to determine. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical Trials.gov PRS (Registration No. NCT03949101). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40123-022-00572-1. Springer Healthcare 2022-09-29 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9521881/ /pubmed/36175821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-022-00572-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Ye, Luyao Xu, Hannan Shi, Ya Yin, Yao Yu, Tao Peng, Yajun Li, Shanshan He, Jiangnan Zhu, Jianfeng Xu, Xun Efficacy and Safety of Consecutive Use of 1% and 0.01% Atropine for Myopia Control in Chinese Children: The Atropine for Children and Adolescent Myopia Progression Study |
title | Efficacy and Safety of Consecutive Use of 1% and 0.01% Atropine for Myopia Control in Chinese Children: The Atropine for Children and Adolescent Myopia Progression Study |
title_full | Efficacy and Safety of Consecutive Use of 1% and 0.01% Atropine for Myopia Control in Chinese Children: The Atropine for Children and Adolescent Myopia Progression Study |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Safety of Consecutive Use of 1% and 0.01% Atropine for Myopia Control in Chinese Children: The Atropine for Children and Adolescent Myopia Progression Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Safety of Consecutive Use of 1% and 0.01% Atropine for Myopia Control in Chinese Children: The Atropine for Children and Adolescent Myopia Progression Study |
title_short | Efficacy and Safety of Consecutive Use of 1% and 0.01% Atropine for Myopia Control in Chinese Children: The Atropine for Children and Adolescent Myopia Progression Study |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of consecutive use of 1% and 0.01% atropine for myopia control in chinese children: the atropine for children and adolescent myopia progression study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9521881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36175821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-022-00572-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yeluyao efficacyandsafetyofconsecutiveuseof1and001atropineformyopiacontrolinchinesechildrentheatropineforchildrenandadolescentmyopiaprogressionstudy AT xuhannan efficacyandsafetyofconsecutiveuseof1and001atropineformyopiacontrolinchinesechildrentheatropineforchildrenandadolescentmyopiaprogressionstudy AT shiya efficacyandsafetyofconsecutiveuseof1and001atropineformyopiacontrolinchinesechildrentheatropineforchildrenandadolescentmyopiaprogressionstudy AT yinyao efficacyandsafetyofconsecutiveuseof1and001atropineformyopiacontrolinchinesechildrentheatropineforchildrenandadolescentmyopiaprogressionstudy AT yutao efficacyandsafetyofconsecutiveuseof1and001atropineformyopiacontrolinchinesechildrentheatropineforchildrenandadolescentmyopiaprogressionstudy AT pengyajun efficacyandsafetyofconsecutiveuseof1and001atropineformyopiacontrolinchinesechildrentheatropineforchildrenandadolescentmyopiaprogressionstudy AT lishanshan efficacyandsafetyofconsecutiveuseof1and001atropineformyopiacontrolinchinesechildrentheatropineforchildrenandadolescentmyopiaprogressionstudy AT hejiangnan efficacyandsafetyofconsecutiveuseof1and001atropineformyopiacontrolinchinesechildrentheatropineforchildrenandadolescentmyopiaprogressionstudy AT zhujianfeng efficacyandsafetyofconsecutiveuseof1and001atropineformyopiacontrolinchinesechildrentheatropineforchildrenandadolescentmyopiaprogressionstudy AT xuxun efficacyandsafetyofconsecutiveuseof1and001atropineformyopiacontrolinchinesechildrentheatropineforchildrenandadolescentmyopiaprogressionstudy |