Cargando…

Putting perception into action with inverse optimal control for continuous psychophysics

Psychophysical methods are a cornerstone of psychology, cognitive science, and neuroscience where they have been used to quantify behavior and its neural correlates for a vast range of mental phenomena. Their power derives from the combination of controlled experiments and rigorous analysis through...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Straub, Dominik, Rothkopf, Constantin A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9522207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36173094
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76635
_version_ 1784800012486574080
author Straub, Dominik
Rothkopf, Constantin A
author_facet Straub, Dominik
Rothkopf, Constantin A
author_sort Straub, Dominik
collection PubMed
description Psychophysical methods are a cornerstone of psychology, cognitive science, and neuroscience where they have been used to quantify behavior and its neural correlates for a vast range of mental phenomena. Their power derives from the combination of controlled experiments and rigorous analysis through signal detection theory. Unfortunately, they require many tedious trials and preferably highly trained participants. A recently developed approach, continuous psychophysics, promises to transform the field by abandoning the rigid trial structure involving binary responses and replacing it with continuous behavioral adjustments to dynamic stimuli. However, what has precluded wide adoption of this approach is that current analysis methods do not account for the additional variability introduced by the motor component of the task and therefore recover perceptual thresholds that are larger compared to equivalent traditional psychophysical experiments. Here, we introduce a computational analysis framework for continuous psychophysics based on Bayesian inverse optimal control. We show via simulations and previously published data that this not only recovers the perceptual thresholds but additionally estimates subjects’ action variability, internal behavioral costs, and subjective beliefs about the experimental stimulus dynamics. Taken together, we provide further evidence for the importance of including acting uncertainties, subjective beliefs, and, crucially, the intrinsic costs of behavior, even in experiments seemingly only investigating perception.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9522207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95222072022-09-30 Putting perception into action with inverse optimal control for continuous psychophysics Straub, Dominik Rothkopf, Constantin A eLife Neuroscience Psychophysical methods are a cornerstone of psychology, cognitive science, and neuroscience where they have been used to quantify behavior and its neural correlates for a vast range of mental phenomena. Their power derives from the combination of controlled experiments and rigorous analysis through signal detection theory. Unfortunately, they require many tedious trials and preferably highly trained participants. A recently developed approach, continuous psychophysics, promises to transform the field by abandoning the rigid trial structure involving binary responses and replacing it with continuous behavioral adjustments to dynamic stimuli. However, what has precluded wide adoption of this approach is that current analysis methods do not account for the additional variability introduced by the motor component of the task and therefore recover perceptual thresholds that are larger compared to equivalent traditional psychophysical experiments. Here, we introduce a computational analysis framework for continuous psychophysics based on Bayesian inverse optimal control. We show via simulations and previously published data that this not only recovers the perceptual thresholds but additionally estimates subjects’ action variability, internal behavioral costs, and subjective beliefs about the experimental stimulus dynamics. Taken together, we provide further evidence for the importance of including acting uncertainties, subjective beliefs, and, crucially, the intrinsic costs of behavior, even in experiments seemingly only investigating perception. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2022-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9522207/ /pubmed/36173094 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76635 Text en © 2022, Straub and Rothkopf https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Straub, Dominik
Rothkopf, Constantin A
Putting perception into action with inverse optimal control for continuous psychophysics
title Putting perception into action with inverse optimal control for continuous psychophysics
title_full Putting perception into action with inverse optimal control for continuous psychophysics
title_fullStr Putting perception into action with inverse optimal control for continuous psychophysics
title_full_unstemmed Putting perception into action with inverse optimal control for continuous psychophysics
title_short Putting perception into action with inverse optimal control for continuous psychophysics
title_sort putting perception into action with inverse optimal control for continuous psychophysics
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9522207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36173094
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76635
work_keys_str_mv AT straubdominik puttingperceptionintoactionwithinverseoptimalcontrolforcontinuouspsychophysics
AT rothkopfconstantina puttingperceptionintoactionwithinverseoptimalcontrolforcontinuouspsychophysics