Cargando…
Can short PROMs support valid factor-based sub-scores? Example of COMQ-12 in chronic otitis media
PURPOSE: Interpretable factor solutions for questionnaire instruments are typically taken as justification for use of factor-based sub-scores. They can indeed articulate content and construct validities of a total and components but do not guarantee criterion validity for clinical application. Our p...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9522295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36174001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274513 |
_version_ | 1784800033781055488 |
---|---|
author | Bukurov, Bojana Haggard, Mark Spencer, Helen Arsovic, Nenad Sipetic Grujicic, Sandra |
author_facet | Bukurov, Bojana Haggard, Mark Spencer, Helen Arsovic, Nenad Sipetic Grujicic, Sandra |
author_sort | Bukurov, Bojana |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Interpretable factor solutions for questionnaire instruments are typically taken as justification for use of factor-based sub-scores. They can indeed articulate content and construct validities of a total and components but do not guarantee criterion validity for clinical application. Our previous documentation of basic psychometric characteristics for a 12-item patient-reported outcome measure in adult chronic otitis media (COMQ-12) justified next appraising criterion validity of sub-scores. METHODS: On 246 cases at 1(st) clinic visit, we compared various classes of factor solution, concentrating on the best-fitting 3-factor ones as widely supported. Clinical data offered two independent measures as external criteria: binaural hearing (audiometric thresholds measured via audiometry) for evaluating ‘Hearing’ sub-score, and oto-microscopic findings for the ‘Ear discharge symptoms’ sub-score. As criterion for the total, and for semi-generic ‘Activities/healthcare’ sub-score, the generic Short Form-36 item set offered a widely used multi-item criterion measure. RESULTS: Factor model fit and parsimony again favoured a 3-factor solution for COMQ-12; however insufficient item support and the dominant 1(st) principal component of variation made sub-scoring problematic. The best solution was bi-factor, from which only the weighted total score met the declared convergent validity standard of r = 0.50. Two of the more specific sub-scores (‘Ear discharge symptoms’ and ‘Hearing’) correlated poorly with clinical findings and weighted binaural hearing thresholds. CONCLUSION: The COMQ-12 total is acceptably content-valid for general clinical purposes, but the small item set, reflecting excessive pressure for brevity in clinical application, does not well support three criterion-valid factor-based scores. This distinction should be made explicit, and profile sub-scoring discouraged until good convergent and furthermore divergent criterion validities are shown. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9522295 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95222952022-09-30 Can short PROMs support valid factor-based sub-scores? Example of COMQ-12 in chronic otitis media Bukurov, Bojana Haggard, Mark Spencer, Helen Arsovic, Nenad Sipetic Grujicic, Sandra PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: Interpretable factor solutions for questionnaire instruments are typically taken as justification for use of factor-based sub-scores. They can indeed articulate content and construct validities of a total and components but do not guarantee criterion validity for clinical application. Our previous documentation of basic psychometric characteristics for a 12-item patient-reported outcome measure in adult chronic otitis media (COMQ-12) justified next appraising criterion validity of sub-scores. METHODS: On 246 cases at 1(st) clinic visit, we compared various classes of factor solution, concentrating on the best-fitting 3-factor ones as widely supported. Clinical data offered two independent measures as external criteria: binaural hearing (audiometric thresholds measured via audiometry) for evaluating ‘Hearing’ sub-score, and oto-microscopic findings for the ‘Ear discharge symptoms’ sub-score. As criterion for the total, and for semi-generic ‘Activities/healthcare’ sub-score, the generic Short Form-36 item set offered a widely used multi-item criterion measure. RESULTS: Factor model fit and parsimony again favoured a 3-factor solution for COMQ-12; however insufficient item support and the dominant 1(st) principal component of variation made sub-scoring problematic. The best solution was bi-factor, from which only the weighted total score met the declared convergent validity standard of r = 0.50. Two of the more specific sub-scores (‘Ear discharge symptoms’ and ‘Hearing’) correlated poorly with clinical findings and weighted binaural hearing thresholds. CONCLUSION: The COMQ-12 total is acceptably content-valid for general clinical purposes, but the small item set, reflecting excessive pressure for brevity in clinical application, does not well support three criterion-valid factor-based scores. This distinction should be made explicit, and profile sub-scoring discouraged until good convergent and furthermore divergent criterion validities are shown. Public Library of Science 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9522295/ /pubmed/36174001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274513 Text en © 2022 Bukurov et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bukurov, Bojana Haggard, Mark Spencer, Helen Arsovic, Nenad Sipetic Grujicic, Sandra Can short PROMs support valid factor-based sub-scores? Example of COMQ-12 in chronic otitis media |
title | Can short PROMs support valid factor-based sub-scores? Example of COMQ-12 in chronic otitis media |
title_full | Can short PROMs support valid factor-based sub-scores? Example of COMQ-12 in chronic otitis media |
title_fullStr | Can short PROMs support valid factor-based sub-scores? Example of COMQ-12 in chronic otitis media |
title_full_unstemmed | Can short PROMs support valid factor-based sub-scores? Example of COMQ-12 in chronic otitis media |
title_short | Can short PROMs support valid factor-based sub-scores? Example of COMQ-12 in chronic otitis media |
title_sort | can short proms support valid factor-based sub-scores? example of comq-12 in chronic otitis media |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9522295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36174001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274513 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bukurovbojana canshortpromssupportvalidfactorbasedsubscoresexampleofcomq12inchronicotitismedia AT haggardmark canshortpromssupportvalidfactorbasedsubscoresexampleofcomq12inchronicotitismedia AT spencerhelen canshortpromssupportvalidfactorbasedsubscoresexampleofcomq12inchronicotitismedia AT arsovicnenad canshortpromssupportvalidfactorbasedsubscoresexampleofcomq12inchronicotitismedia AT sipeticgrujicicsandra canshortpromssupportvalidfactorbasedsubscoresexampleofcomq12inchronicotitismedia |