Cargando…

Can short PROMs support valid factor-based sub-scores? Example of COMQ-12 in chronic otitis media

PURPOSE: Interpretable factor solutions for questionnaire instruments are typically taken as justification for use of factor-based sub-scores. They can indeed articulate content and construct validities of a total and components but do not guarantee criterion validity for clinical application. Our p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bukurov, Bojana, Haggard, Mark, Spencer, Helen, Arsovic, Nenad, Sipetic Grujicic, Sandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9522295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36174001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274513
_version_ 1784800033781055488
author Bukurov, Bojana
Haggard, Mark
Spencer, Helen
Arsovic, Nenad
Sipetic Grujicic, Sandra
author_facet Bukurov, Bojana
Haggard, Mark
Spencer, Helen
Arsovic, Nenad
Sipetic Grujicic, Sandra
author_sort Bukurov, Bojana
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Interpretable factor solutions for questionnaire instruments are typically taken as justification for use of factor-based sub-scores. They can indeed articulate content and construct validities of a total and components but do not guarantee criterion validity for clinical application. Our previous documentation of basic psychometric characteristics for a 12-item patient-reported outcome measure in adult chronic otitis media (COMQ-12) justified next appraising criterion validity of sub-scores. METHODS: On 246 cases at 1(st) clinic visit, we compared various classes of factor solution, concentrating on the best-fitting 3-factor ones as widely supported. Clinical data offered two independent measures as external criteria: binaural hearing (audiometric thresholds measured via audiometry) for evaluating ‘Hearing’ sub-score, and oto-microscopic findings for the ‘Ear discharge symptoms’ sub-score. As criterion for the total, and for semi-generic ‘Activities/healthcare’ sub-score, the generic Short Form-36 item set offered a widely used multi-item criterion measure. RESULTS: Factor model fit and parsimony again favoured a 3-factor solution for COMQ-12; however insufficient item support and the dominant 1(st) principal component of variation made sub-scoring problematic. The best solution was bi-factor, from which only the weighted total score met the declared convergent validity standard of r = 0.50. Two of the more specific sub-scores (‘Ear discharge symptoms’ and ‘Hearing’) correlated poorly with clinical findings and weighted binaural hearing thresholds. CONCLUSION: The COMQ-12 total is acceptably content-valid for general clinical purposes, but the small item set, reflecting excessive pressure for brevity in clinical application, does not well support three criterion-valid factor-based scores. This distinction should be made explicit, and profile sub-scoring discouraged until good convergent and furthermore divergent criterion validities are shown.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9522295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95222952022-09-30 Can short PROMs support valid factor-based sub-scores? Example of COMQ-12 in chronic otitis media Bukurov, Bojana Haggard, Mark Spencer, Helen Arsovic, Nenad Sipetic Grujicic, Sandra PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: Interpretable factor solutions for questionnaire instruments are typically taken as justification for use of factor-based sub-scores. They can indeed articulate content and construct validities of a total and components but do not guarantee criterion validity for clinical application. Our previous documentation of basic psychometric characteristics for a 12-item patient-reported outcome measure in adult chronic otitis media (COMQ-12) justified next appraising criterion validity of sub-scores. METHODS: On 246 cases at 1(st) clinic visit, we compared various classes of factor solution, concentrating on the best-fitting 3-factor ones as widely supported. Clinical data offered two independent measures as external criteria: binaural hearing (audiometric thresholds measured via audiometry) for evaluating ‘Hearing’ sub-score, and oto-microscopic findings for the ‘Ear discharge symptoms’ sub-score. As criterion for the total, and for semi-generic ‘Activities/healthcare’ sub-score, the generic Short Form-36 item set offered a widely used multi-item criterion measure. RESULTS: Factor model fit and parsimony again favoured a 3-factor solution for COMQ-12; however insufficient item support and the dominant 1(st) principal component of variation made sub-scoring problematic. The best solution was bi-factor, from which only the weighted total score met the declared convergent validity standard of r = 0.50. Two of the more specific sub-scores (‘Ear discharge symptoms’ and ‘Hearing’) correlated poorly with clinical findings and weighted binaural hearing thresholds. CONCLUSION: The COMQ-12 total is acceptably content-valid for general clinical purposes, but the small item set, reflecting excessive pressure for brevity in clinical application, does not well support three criterion-valid factor-based scores. This distinction should be made explicit, and profile sub-scoring discouraged until good convergent and furthermore divergent criterion validities are shown. Public Library of Science 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9522295/ /pubmed/36174001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274513 Text en © 2022 Bukurov et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bukurov, Bojana
Haggard, Mark
Spencer, Helen
Arsovic, Nenad
Sipetic Grujicic, Sandra
Can short PROMs support valid factor-based sub-scores? Example of COMQ-12 in chronic otitis media
title Can short PROMs support valid factor-based sub-scores? Example of COMQ-12 in chronic otitis media
title_full Can short PROMs support valid factor-based sub-scores? Example of COMQ-12 in chronic otitis media
title_fullStr Can short PROMs support valid factor-based sub-scores? Example of COMQ-12 in chronic otitis media
title_full_unstemmed Can short PROMs support valid factor-based sub-scores? Example of COMQ-12 in chronic otitis media
title_short Can short PROMs support valid factor-based sub-scores? Example of COMQ-12 in chronic otitis media
title_sort can short proms support valid factor-based sub-scores? example of comq-12 in chronic otitis media
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9522295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36174001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274513
work_keys_str_mv AT bukurovbojana canshortpromssupportvalidfactorbasedsubscoresexampleofcomq12inchronicotitismedia
AT haggardmark canshortpromssupportvalidfactorbasedsubscoresexampleofcomq12inchronicotitismedia
AT spencerhelen canshortpromssupportvalidfactorbasedsubscoresexampleofcomq12inchronicotitismedia
AT arsovicnenad canshortpromssupportvalidfactorbasedsubscoresexampleofcomq12inchronicotitismedia
AT sipeticgrujicicsandra canshortpromssupportvalidfactorbasedsubscoresexampleofcomq12inchronicotitismedia