Cargando…
Evidence and consensus on technical aspects of embryo transfer
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer (US-GET) is a widely performed procedure, but standards for the best practice are not available. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: This document aims to provide an overview of technical aspects of US-GET after considering the published data and including the prep...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9522404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36196080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoac038 |
_version_ | 1784800058821050368 |
---|---|
author | D’Angelo, Arianna Panayotidis, Costas Alteri, Alessandra Mcheik, Saria Veleva, Zdravka |
author_facet | D’Angelo, Arianna Panayotidis, Costas Alteri, Alessandra Mcheik, Saria Veleva, Zdravka |
author_sort | D’Angelo, Arianna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer (US-GET) is a widely performed procedure, but standards for the best practice are not available. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: This document aims to provide an overview of technical aspects of US-GET after considering the published data and including the preparation for the embryo transfer (ET) procedure, the actual procedure, the post-procedure care, associated pathologies, complications and risks, quality assurance and practitioners’ performance. SEARCH METHODS: A literature search for evidence on key aspects of the ET procedure was carried out from database inception to November 2021. Selected papers (n = 359) relevant to the topic were analysed by the authors. The following key points were considered in the papers: whether ultrasound (US) practice standards were explained, to what extent the ET technique was described and whether complications or incidents and how to prevent such events were reported. In the end, 89 papers could be used to support the recommendations in this document, which focused on transabdominal US-GET. OUTCOMES: The relevant papers found in the literature search were included in the current document and described according to the topic in three main sections: requirements and preparations prior to ET, the ET procedure and training and competence for ET. Recommendations are provided on preparations prior to ET, equipment and materials, ET technique, possible risks and complications, training and competence. Specific aspects of the laboratory procedures are covered, in particular the different loading techniques and their potential impact on the final outcomes. Potential future developments and research priorities regarding the ET technique are also outlined. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Many topics were not covered in the literature review and some recommendations were based on expert opinions and are not necessarily evidence based. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: ET is the last procedural step in an ART treatment and is a crucial step towards achieving a pregnancy and live birth. The current paper set out to bring together the recent developments considering all aspects of ET, especially emphasizing US quality imaging. There are still many questions needing answers, and these can be subject of future research. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding. A.D.A. has received royalties from CRC Press and personal honorarium from Cook, Ferring and Cooper Surgical. The other co-authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9522404 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95224042022-10-03 Evidence and consensus on technical aspects of embryo transfer D’Angelo, Arianna Panayotidis, Costas Alteri, Alessandra Mcheik, Saria Veleva, Zdravka Hum Reprod Open Review BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer (US-GET) is a widely performed procedure, but standards for the best practice are not available. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: This document aims to provide an overview of technical aspects of US-GET after considering the published data and including the preparation for the embryo transfer (ET) procedure, the actual procedure, the post-procedure care, associated pathologies, complications and risks, quality assurance and practitioners’ performance. SEARCH METHODS: A literature search for evidence on key aspects of the ET procedure was carried out from database inception to November 2021. Selected papers (n = 359) relevant to the topic were analysed by the authors. The following key points were considered in the papers: whether ultrasound (US) practice standards were explained, to what extent the ET technique was described and whether complications or incidents and how to prevent such events were reported. In the end, 89 papers could be used to support the recommendations in this document, which focused on transabdominal US-GET. OUTCOMES: The relevant papers found in the literature search were included in the current document and described according to the topic in three main sections: requirements and preparations prior to ET, the ET procedure and training and competence for ET. Recommendations are provided on preparations prior to ET, equipment and materials, ET technique, possible risks and complications, training and competence. Specific aspects of the laboratory procedures are covered, in particular the different loading techniques and their potential impact on the final outcomes. Potential future developments and research priorities regarding the ET technique are also outlined. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Many topics were not covered in the literature review and some recommendations were based on expert opinions and are not necessarily evidence based. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: ET is the last procedural step in an ART treatment and is a crucial step towards achieving a pregnancy and live birth. The current paper set out to bring together the recent developments considering all aspects of ET, especially emphasizing US quality imaging. There are still many questions needing answers, and these can be subject of future research. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding. A.D.A. has received royalties from CRC Press and personal honorarium from Cook, Ferring and Cooper Surgical. The other co-authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. Oxford University Press 2022-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9522404/ /pubmed/36196080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoac038 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review D’Angelo, Arianna Panayotidis, Costas Alteri, Alessandra Mcheik, Saria Veleva, Zdravka Evidence and consensus on technical aspects of embryo transfer |
title | Evidence and consensus on technical aspects of embryo transfer |
title_full | Evidence and consensus on technical aspects of embryo transfer |
title_fullStr | Evidence and consensus on technical aspects of embryo transfer |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence and consensus on technical aspects of embryo transfer |
title_short | Evidence and consensus on technical aspects of embryo transfer |
title_sort | evidence and consensus on technical aspects of embryo transfer |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9522404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36196080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoac038 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dangeloarianna evidenceandconsensusontechnicalaspectsofembryotransfer AT panayotidiscostas evidenceandconsensusontechnicalaspectsofembryotransfer AT alterialessandra evidenceandconsensusontechnicalaspectsofembryotransfer AT mcheiksaria evidenceandconsensusontechnicalaspectsofembryotransfer AT velevazdravka evidenceandconsensusontechnicalaspectsofembryotransfer |