Cargando…

Irradiance footprint of phototherapy devices: a comparative study

BACKGROUND: Phototherapy (PT) is the standard treatment of neonatal unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia. The irradiance footprint, i.e., the illuminated area by the PT device with sufficient spectral irradiance, is essential for PT to be effective. Irradiance footprint measurements are not performed in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dam-Vervloet, Alida J., Bosschaart, Nienke, van Straaten, Henrica L. M., Poot, Lieke, Hulzebos, Christian V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9522581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34728809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-021-01795-x
_version_ 1784800094258724864
author Dam-Vervloet, Alida J.
Bosschaart, Nienke
van Straaten, Henrica L. M.
Poot, Lieke
Hulzebos, Christian V.
author_facet Dam-Vervloet, Alida J.
Bosschaart, Nienke
van Straaten, Henrica L. M.
Poot, Lieke
Hulzebos, Christian V.
author_sort Dam-Vervloet, Alida J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Phototherapy (PT) is the standard treatment of neonatal unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia. The irradiance footprint, i.e., the illuminated area by the PT device with sufficient spectral irradiance, is essential for PT to be effective. Irradiance footprint measurements are not performed in current clinical practice. We describe a user-friendly method to systematically evaluate the high spectral irradiance (HSI) footprint (illuminated area with spectral irradiance of ≥30 μW cm(−2) nm(−1)) of PT devices in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six commercially available LED-based overhead PT devices were evaluated in overhead configuration with an incubator. Spectral irradiance (µW cm(−2) nm(−1)) and HSI footprint were measured with a radiospectrometer (BiliBlanket Meter II). RESULTS: The average measured spectral irradiance ranged between 27 and 52 μW cm(−2) nm(−1) and HSI footprint ranged between 67 and 1465 cm(2), respectively. Three, two, and one PT devices out of six covered the average BSA of an infant born at 22, 26–32, and 40 weeks of gestation, respectively. CONCLUSION: Spectral irradiance of LED-based overhead PT devices is often lower than manufacturer’s specifications, and HSI footprints not always cover the average BSA of a newborn infant. The proposed measurement method will contribute to awareness of the importance of irradiance level as well as footprint measurements in the management of neonatal jaundice. IMPACT: While a sufficient spectral irradiance footprint is essential for PT to be effective, some PT devices have spectral irradiance footprints that are too small to cover the entire body surface area (BSA) of a newborn infant. This study introduces a user-friendly, accessible method to systematically evaluate the spectral irradiance level and footprint of PT devices. This study supports awareness on the role of the spectral irradiance footprint in the efficacy of PT devices. Irradiance footprint can be easily measured during phototherapy with the proposed method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9522581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95225812022-10-01 Irradiance footprint of phototherapy devices: a comparative study Dam-Vervloet, Alida J. Bosschaart, Nienke van Straaten, Henrica L. M. Poot, Lieke Hulzebos, Christian V. Pediatr Res Basic Science Article BACKGROUND: Phototherapy (PT) is the standard treatment of neonatal unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia. The irradiance footprint, i.e., the illuminated area by the PT device with sufficient spectral irradiance, is essential for PT to be effective. Irradiance footprint measurements are not performed in current clinical practice. We describe a user-friendly method to systematically evaluate the high spectral irradiance (HSI) footprint (illuminated area with spectral irradiance of ≥30 μW cm(−2) nm(−1)) of PT devices in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six commercially available LED-based overhead PT devices were evaluated in overhead configuration with an incubator. Spectral irradiance (µW cm(−2) nm(−1)) and HSI footprint were measured with a radiospectrometer (BiliBlanket Meter II). RESULTS: The average measured spectral irradiance ranged between 27 and 52 μW cm(−2) nm(−1) and HSI footprint ranged between 67 and 1465 cm(2), respectively. Three, two, and one PT devices out of six covered the average BSA of an infant born at 22, 26–32, and 40 weeks of gestation, respectively. CONCLUSION: Spectral irradiance of LED-based overhead PT devices is often lower than manufacturer’s specifications, and HSI footprints not always cover the average BSA of a newborn infant. The proposed measurement method will contribute to awareness of the importance of irradiance level as well as footprint measurements in the management of neonatal jaundice. IMPACT: While a sufficient spectral irradiance footprint is essential for PT to be effective, some PT devices have spectral irradiance footprints that are too small to cover the entire body surface area (BSA) of a newborn infant. This study introduces a user-friendly, accessible method to systematically evaluate the spectral irradiance level and footprint of PT devices. This study supports awareness on the role of the spectral irradiance footprint in the efficacy of PT devices. Irradiance footprint can be easily measured during phototherapy with the proposed method. Nature Publishing Group US 2021-11-02 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9522581/ /pubmed/34728809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-021-01795-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Basic Science Article
Dam-Vervloet, Alida J.
Bosschaart, Nienke
van Straaten, Henrica L. M.
Poot, Lieke
Hulzebos, Christian V.
Irradiance footprint of phototherapy devices: a comparative study
title Irradiance footprint of phototherapy devices: a comparative study
title_full Irradiance footprint of phototherapy devices: a comparative study
title_fullStr Irradiance footprint of phototherapy devices: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Irradiance footprint of phototherapy devices: a comparative study
title_short Irradiance footprint of phototherapy devices: a comparative study
title_sort irradiance footprint of phototherapy devices: a comparative study
topic Basic Science Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9522581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34728809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-021-01795-x
work_keys_str_mv AT damvervloetalidaj irradiancefootprintofphototherapydevicesacomparativestudy
AT bosschaartnienke irradiancefootprintofphototherapydevicesacomparativestudy
AT vanstraatenhenricalm irradiancefootprintofphototherapydevicesacomparativestudy
AT pootlieke irradiancefootprintofphototherapydevicesacomparativestudy
AT hulzeboschristianv irradiancefootprintofphototherapydevicesacomparativestudy