Cargando…

Collaborating with Patient Partners to Model Clinical Care Pathways in Major Depressive Disorder: The Benefits of Mixing Evidence and Lived Experience

BACKGROUND: Partnering with patients can enrich the design and development of models of clinical care pathways, yet the practice is not commonplace. Guidelines or “best practices” for patient involvement in modeling are scarce. OBJECTIVES: In this paper, we outline the steps we took to form an effec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bunka, Mary, Ghanbarian, Shahzad, Riches, Linda, Landry, Ginny, Edwards, Louisa, Hoens, Alison M., Bryan, Stirling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9522760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35877043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-022-01175-1
_version_ 1784800127633850368
author Bunka, Mary
Ghanbarian, Shahzad
Riches, Linda
Landry, Ginny
Edwards, Louisa
Hoens, Alison M.
Bryan, Stirling
author_facet Bunka, Mary
Ghanbarian, Shahzad
Riches, Linda
Landry, Ginny
Edwards, Louisa
Hoens, Alison M.
Bryan, Stirling
author_sort Bunka, Mary
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Partnering with patients can enrich the design and development of models of clinical care pathways, yet the practice is not commonplace. Guidelines or “best practices” for patient involvement in modeling are scarce. OBJECTIVES: In this paper, we outline the steps we took to form an effective partnership with patients to design a robust microsimulation Markov model of major depressive disorder care pathways in British Columbia, Canada, with the aim of encouraging other teams to partner with patients in healthcare modeling endeavors. METHODS: We describe three unique phases of our collaborative process: uncertainty, mapping, and structured collaboration. We then explore the unique contributions the patient partners made, not only to the model itself, but to our process. Key perspectives are shared from both the modeler and the patient partners in their own words. RESULTS: The patient partners made distinct contributions by challenging and verifying modeling assumptions, noting limitations of the model, and suggesting areas for future research. Both the patient partners and the modelers saw great value in the partnership and agreed that the model was strengthened by the diversity of the team. CONCLUSIONS: We present our learning and key recommendations for future modeling teams in the absence of tested frameworks. We encourage more widespread adoption of patient involvement in modeling and the development of guidelines for such work to increase the democracy of scientific decision making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9522760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95227602022-10-01 Collaborating with Patient Partners to Model Clinical Care Pathways in Major Depressive Disorder: The Benefits of Mixing Evidence and Lived Experience Bunka, Mary Ghanbarian, Shahzad Riches, Linda Landry, Ginny Edwards, Louisa Hoens, Alison M. Bryan, Stirling Pharmacoeconomics Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Partnering with patients can enrich the design and development of models of clinical care pathways, yet the practice is not commonplace. Guidelines or “best practices” for patient involvement in modeling are scarce. OBJECTIVES: In this paper, we outline the steps we took to form an effective partnership with patients to design a robust microsimulation Markov model of major depressive disorder care pathways in British Columbia, Canada, with the aim of encouraging other teams to partner with patients in healthcare modeling endeavors. METHODS: We describe three unique phases of our collaborative process: uncertainty, mapping, and structured collaboration. We then explore the unique contributions the patient partners made, not only to the model itself, but to our process. Key perspectives are shared from both the modeler and the patient partners in their own words. RESULTS: The patient partners made distinct contributions by challenging and verifying modeling assumptions, noting limitations of the model, and suggesting areas for future research. Both the patient partners and the modelers saw great value in the partnership and agreed that the model was strengthened by the diversity of the team. CONCLUSIONS: We present our learning and key recommendations for future modeling teams in the absence of tested frameworks. We encourage more widespread adoption of patient involvement in modeling and the development of guidelines for such work to increase the democracy of scientific decision making. Springer International Publishing 2022-07-25 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9522760/ /pubmed/35877043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-022-01175-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Bunka, Mary
Ghanbarian, Shahzad
Riches, Linda
Landry, Ginny
Edwards, Louisa
Hoens, Alison M.
Bryan, Stirling
Collaborating with Patient Partners to Model Clinical Care Pathways in Major Depressive Disorder: The Benefits of Mixing Evidence and Lived Experience
title Collaborating with Patient Partners to Model Clinical Care Pathways in Major Depressive Disorder: The Benefits of Mixing Evidence and Lived Experience
title_full Collaborating with Patient Partners to Model Clinical Care Pathways in Major Depressive Disorder: The Benefits of Mixing Evidence and Lived Experience
title_fullStr Collaborating with Patient Partners to Model Clinical Care Pathways in Major Depressive Disorder: The Benefits of Mixing Evidence and Lived Experience
title_full_unstemmed Collaborating with Patient Partners to Model Clinical Care Pathways in Major Depressive Disorder: The Benefits of Mixing Evidence and Lived Experience
title_short Collaborating with Patient Partners to Model Clinical Care Pathways in Major Depressive Disorder: The Benefits of Mixing Evidence and Lived Experience
title_sort collaborating with patient partners to model clinical care pathways in major depressive disorder: the benefits of mixing evidence and lived experience
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9522760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35877043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-022-01175-1
work_keys_str_mv AT bunkamary collaboratingwithpatientpartnerstomodelclinicalcarepathwaysinmajordepressivedisorderthebenefitsofmixingevidenceandlivedexperience
AT ghanbarianshahzad collaboratingwithpatientpartnerstomodelclinicalcarepathwaysinmajordepressivedisorderthebenefitsofmixingevidenceandlivedexperience
AT richeslinda collaboratingwithpatientpartnerstomodelclinicalcarepathwaysinmajordepressivedisorderthebenefitsofmixingevidenceandlivedexperience
AT landryginny collaboratingwithpatientpartnerstomodelclinicalcarepathwaysinmajordepressivedisorderthebenefitsofmixingevidenceandlivedexperience
AT edwardslouisa collaboratingwithpatientpartnerstomodelclinicalcarepathwaysinmajordepressivedisorderthebenefitsofmixingevidenceandlivedexperience
AT hoensalisonm collaboratingwithpatientpartnerstomodelclinicalcarepathwaysinmajordepressivedisorderthebenefitsofmixingevidenceandlivedexperience
AT bryanstirling collaboratingwithpatientpartnerstomodelclinicalcarepathwaysinmajordepressivedisorderthebenefitsofmixingevidenceandlivedexperience