Cargando…

Preoperative radiomics model using gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for predicting β-catenin mutation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVE: To compare and evaluate radiomics models to preoperatively predict β-catenin mutation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Ninety-eight patients who underwent preoperative gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced MRI were retrospectively included. Volumes of interes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeng, Fengxia, Dai, Hui, Li, Xu, Guo, Le, Jia, Ningyang, Yang, Jun, Huang, Danping, Zeng, Hui, Chen, Weiguo, Zhang, Ling, Qin, Genggeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9523364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36185240
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.916126
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To compare and evaluate radiomics models to preoperatively predict β-catenin mutation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Ninety-eight patients who underwent preoperative gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced MRI were retrospectively included. Volumes of interest were manually delineated on arterial phase, portal venous phase, delay phase, and hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images. Radiomics features extracted from different combinations of imaging phases were analyzed and validated. A linear support vector classifier was applied to develop different models. RESULTS: Among all 15 types of radiomics models, the model with the best performance was seen in the R(HBP) radiomics model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity of the R(HBP) radiomics model in the training and validation cohorts were 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75–0.93), 0.75, 1.0, and 0.65 and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.63–0.93), 0.73, 0.67, and 0.76, respectively. The combined model integrated radiomics features in the R(HBP) radiomics model, and signatures in the clinical model did not improve further compared to the single HBP radiomics model with AUCs of 0.86 and 0.76. Good calibration for the best R(HBP) radiomics model was displayed in both cohorts; the decision curve showed that the net benefit could achieve 0.15. The most important radiomics features were low and high gray-level zone emphases based on gray-level size zone matrix with the same Shapley additive explanation values of 0.424. CONCLUSION: The R(HBP) radiomics model may be used as an effective model indicative of HCCs with β-catenin mutation preoperatively and thus could guide personalized medicine.