Cargando…

The Influence of Context on Implementation and Improvement: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Secondary Analyses Study

BACKGROUND: Caring for the well-being of older adults is one of the greatest challenges in modern societies. Improving the quality of care and life for older adults and the work lives of their care providers calls for effective knowledge translation of evidence-based best practices. OBJECTIVE: This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Estabrooks, Carole, Song, Yuting, Anderson, Ruth, Beeber, Anna, Berta, Whitney, Chamberlain, Stephanie, Cummings, Greta, Duan, Yinfei, Hayduk, Leslie, Hoben, Matthias, Iaconi, Alba, Lanham, Holly, Perez, Janelle, Wang, Jing, Norton, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9523530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36107475
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/40611
_version_ 1784800310175203328
author Estabrooks, Carole
Song, Yuting
Anderson, Ruth
Beeber, Anna
Berta, Whitney
Chamberlain, Stephanie
Cummings, Greta
Duan, Yinfei
Hayduk, Leslie
Hoben, Matthias
Iaconi, Alba
Lanham, Holly
Perez, Janelle
Wang, Jing
Norton, Peter
author_facet Estabrooks, Carole
Song, Yuting
Anderson, Ruth
Beeber, Anna
Berta, Whitney
Chamberlain, Stephanie
Cummings, Greta
Duan, Yinfei
Hayduk, Leslie
Hoben, Matthias
Iaconi, Alba
Lanham, Holly
Perez, Janelle
Wang, Jing
Norton, Peter
author_sort Estabrooks, Carole
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Caring for the well-being of older adults is one of the greatest challenges in modern societies. Improving the quality of care and life for older adults and the work lives of their care providers calls for effective knowledge translation of evidence-based best practices. OBJECTIVE: This study’s purpose is to contribute to knowledge translation by better understanding the roles of organizational context (workplace environment) and facilitation (process or role) in implementation and improvement success. Our study has 2 goals: (1) to advance knowledge translation science by further developing and testing the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework (which outlines how implementation relies on the interplay of context, facilitation, and evidence) and (2) to advance research by optimizing implementation success via tailoring of modifiable elements of organizational context and facilitation. METHODS: This is secondary analyses of 15 years of longitudinal data from the Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) program’s multiple data sources. This research is ongoing in long-term care (LTC) homes in western Canada. TREC data include the following: 5 waves of survey collection, 2 clinical trials, and regular ongoing outcome data for LTC residents. We will use a sequential exploratory and confirmatory mixed methods design. We will analyze qualitative and quantitative data holdings in an iterative process: (1) comprehensive reanalysis of qualitative data to derive hypotheses, (2) quantitative modeling to test hypotheses, and (3) action cycles to further refine and integrate qualitative and quantitative analyses. The research team includes 4 stakeholder panels: (1) system decision- and policy makers, (2) care home managers, (3) direct care staff, and (4) a citizen engagement group of people living with dementia and family members of LTC residents. A fifth group is our panel of external scientific advisors. Each panel will engage periodically, providing their perspectives on project direction and findings. RESULTS: This study is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Ethics approval was obtained from the University of Alberta (Pro00096541). The results of the secondary analyses are expected by the end of 2023. CONCLUSIONS: The project will advance knowledge translation science by deepening our understanding of the roles of context, the interactions between context and facilitation, and their influence on resident and staff quality outcomes. Importantly, findings will inform understanding of the mechanisms by which context and facilitation affect the success of implementation and offer insights into factors that influence the implementation success of interventions in nursing homes. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/40611
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9523530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95235302022-10-01 The Influence of Context on Implementation and Improvement: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Secondary Analyses Study Estabrooks, Carole Song, Yuting Anderson, Ruth Beeber, Anna Berta, Whitney Chamberlain, Stephanie Cummings, Greta Duan, Yinfei Hayduk, Leslie Hoben, Matthias Iaconi, Alba Lanham, Holly Perez, Janelle Wang, Jing Norton, Peter JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: Caring for the well-being of older adults is one of the greatest challenges in modern societies. Improving the quality of care and life for older adults and the work lives of their care providers calls for effective knowledge translation of evidence-based best practices. OBJECTIVE: This study’s purpose is to contribute to knowledge translation by better understanding the roles of organizational context (workplace environment) and facilitation (process or role) in implementation and improvement success. Our study has 2 goals: (1) to advance knowledge translation science by further developing and testing the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework (which outlines how implementation relies on the interplay of context, facilitation, and evidence) and (2) to advance research by optimizing implementation success via tailoring of modifiable elements of organizational context and facilitation. METHODS: This is secondary analyses of 15 years of longitudinal data from the Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) program’s multiple data sources. This research is ongoing in long-term care (LTC) homes in western Canada. TREC data include the following: 5 waves of survey collection, 2 clinical trials, and regular ongoing outcome data for LTC residents. We will use a sequential exploratory and confirmatory mixed methods design. We will analyze qualitative and quantitative data holdings in an iterative process: (1) comprehensive reanalysis of qualitative data to derive hypotheses, (2) quantitative modeling to test hypotheses, and (3) action cycles to further refine and integrate qualitative and quantitative analyses. The research team includes 4 stakeholder panels: (1) system decision- and policy makers, (2) care home managers, (3) direct care staff, and (4) a citizen engagement group of people living with dementia and family members of LTC residents. A fifth group is our panel of external scientific advisors. Each panel will engage periodically, providing their perspectives on project direction and findings. RESULTS: This study is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Ethics approval was obtained from the University of Alberta (Pro00096541). The results of the secondary analyses are expected by the end of 2023. CONCLUSIONS: The project will advance knowledge translation science by deepening our understanding of the roles of context, the interactions between context and facilitation, and their influence on resident and staff quality outcomes. Importantly, findings will inform understanding of the mechanisms by which context and facilitation affect the success of implementation and offer insights into factors that influence the implementation success of interventions in nursing homes. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/40611 JMIR Publications 2022-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9523530/ /pubmed/36107475 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/40611 Text en ©Carole Estabrooks, Yuting Song, Ruth Anderson, Anna Beeber, Whitney Berta, Stephanie Chamberlain, Greta Cummings, Yinfei Duan, Leslie Hayduk, Matthias Hoben, Alba Iaconi, Holly Lanham, Janelle Perez, Jing Wang, Peter Norton. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 15.09.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Protocol
Estabrooks, Carole
Song, Yuting
Anderson, Ruth
Beeber, Anna
Berta, Whitney
Chamberlain, Stephanie
Cummings, Greta
Duan, Yinfei
Hayduk, Leslie
Hoben, Matthias
Iaconi, Alba
Lanham, Holly
Perez, Janelle
Wang, Jing
Norton, Peter
The Influence of Context on Implementation and Improvement: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Secondary Analyses Study
title The Influence of Context on Implementation and Improvement: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Secondary Analyses Study
title_full The Influence of Context on Implementation and Improvement: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Secondary Analyses Study
title_fullStr The Influence of Context on Implementation and Improvement: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Secondary Analyses Study
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Context on Implementation and Improvement: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Secondary Analyses Study
title_short The Influence of Context on Implementation and Improvement: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Secondary Analyses Study
title_sort influence of context on implementation and improvement: protocol for a mixed methods, secondary analyses study
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9523530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36107475
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/40611
work_keys_str_mv AT estabrookscarole theinfluenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT songyuting theinfluenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT andersonruth theinfluenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT beeberanna theinfluenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT bertawhitney theinfluenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT chamberlainstephanie theinfluenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT cummingsgreta theinfluenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT duanyinfei theinfluenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT haydukleslie theinfluenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT hobenmatthias theinfluenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT iaconialba theinfluenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT lanhamholly theinfluenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT perezjanelle theinfluenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT wangjing theinfluenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT nortonpeter theinfluenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT estabrookscarole influenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT songyuting influenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT andersonruth influenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT beeberanna influenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT bertawhitney influenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT chamberlainstephanie influenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT cummingsgreta influenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT duanyinfei influenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT haydukleslie influenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT hobenmatthias influenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT iaconialba influenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT lanhamholly influenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT perezjanelle influenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT wangjing influenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy
AT nortonpeter influenceofcontextonimplementationandimprovementprotocolforamixedmethodssecondaryanalysesstudy