Cargando…

An international study on implementation and facilitators and barriers for parent‐infant closeness in neonatal units

IMPORTANCE: Parent‐infant closeness and active parent participation in neonatal care are important for parent and infant health. OBJECTIVE: To give an overview of current neonatal settings and gain an in‐depth understanding of facilitators and barriers to parent‐infant closeness, zero‐separation, in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Veenendaal, Nicole R., Labrie, Nanon H.M., Mader, Silke, van Kempen, Anne A. M. W., van der Schoor, Sophie R. D., van Goudoever, Johannes B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9523817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36203512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ped4.12339
_version_ 1784800370206179328
author van Veenendaal, Nicole R.
Labrie, Nanon H.M.
Mader, Silke
van Kempen, Anne A. M. W.
van der Schoor, Sophie R. D.
van Goudoever, Johannes B.
author_facet van Veenendaal, Nicole R.
Labrie, Nanon H.M.
Mader, Silke
van Kempen, Anne A. M. W.
van der Schoor, Sophie R. D.
van Goudoever, Johannes B.
author_sort van Veenendaal, Nicole R.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Parent‐infant closeness and active parent participation in neonatal care are important for parent and infant health. OBJECTIVE: To give an overview of current neonatal settings and gain an in‐depth understanding of facilitators and barriers to parent‐infant closeness, zero‐separation, in 19 countries. METHODS: Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) professionals, representing 45 NICUs from a range of geographic regions in Europe and Canada, were purposefully selected and interviewed June–December 2018. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify, analyze and report patterns (themes) for parent‐infant closeness across the entire series of interviews. RESULTS: Parent‐infant separation during infant and/or maternity care is very common (42/45 units, 93%), despite the implementation of family integrated care (FICare) practices, including parent participation in medical rounds (17/45, 38%), structured education sessions for parents (16/45, 36%) and structured training for healthcare professionals (22/45, 49%). NICU professionals encountered four main themes with facilitators and barriers for parent‐infant closeness on and between the hospital, unit, staff, and family level: Culture (jointly held characteristics, values, thinking and behaviors about parental presence and participation in the unit), Collaboration (the act of working together between and within different levels), Capacities (resources and policies), and Coaching (education to acquire and transfer knowledge and skills). INTERPRETATION: Implementing parent‐infant closeness in the NICU is still challenging for healthcare professionals. Further optimization in neonatal care towards zero‐separation and parent‐infant closeness can be achieved by enforcing the ‘four Cs for Closeness’: Culture, Collaboration, Capacities, and Coaching.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9523817
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95238172022-10-05 An international study on implementation and facilitators and barriers for parent‐infant closeness in neonatal units van Veenendaal, Nicole R. Labrie, Nanon H.M. Mader, Silke van Kempen, Anne A. M. W. van der Schoor, Sophie R. D. van Goudoever, Johannes B. Pediatr Investig Original Article IMPORTANCE: Parent‐infant closeness and active parent participation in neonatal care are important for parent and infant health. OBJECTIVE: To give an overview of current neonatal settings and gain an in‐depth understanding of facilitators and barriers to parent‐infant closeness, zero‐separation, in 19 countries. METHODS: Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) professionals, representing 45 NICUs from a range of geographic regions in Europe and Canada, were purposefully selected and interviewed June–December 2018. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify, analyze and report patterns (themes) for parent‐infant closeness across the entire series of interviews. RESULTS: Parent‐infant separation during infant and/or maternity care is very common (42/45 units, 93%), despite the implementation of family integrated care (FICare) practices, including parent participation in medical rounds (17/45, 38%), structured education sessions for parents (16/45, 36%) and structured training for healthcare professionals (22/45, 49%). NICU professionals encountered four main themes with facilitators and barriers for parent‐infant closeness on and between the hospital, unit, staff, and family level: Culture (jointly held characteristics, values, thinking and behaviors about parental presence and participation in the unit), Collaboration (the act of working together between and within different levels), Capacities (resources and policies), and Coaching (education to acquire and transfer knowledge and skills). INTERPRETATION: Implementing parent‐infant closeness in the NICU is still challenging for healthcare professionals. Further optimization in neonatal care towards zero‐separation and parent‐infant closeness can be achieved by enforcing the ‘four Cs for Closeness’: Culture, Collaboration, Capacities, and Coaching. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9523817/ /pubmed/36203512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ped4.12339 Text en © 2022 Chinese Medical Association. Pediatric Investigation published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Futang Research Center of Pediatric Development. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Article
van Veenendaal, Nicole R.
Labrie, Nanon H.M.
Mader, Silke
van Kempen, Anne A. M. W.
van der Schoor, Sophie R. D.
van Goudoever, Johannes B.
An international study on implementation and facilitators and barriers for parent‐infant closeness in neonatal units
title An international study on implementation and facilitators and barriers for parent‐infant closeness in neonatal units
title_full An international study on implementation and facilitators and barriers for parent‐infant closeness in neonatal units
title_fullStr An international study on implementation and facilitators and barriers for parent‐infant closeness in neonatal units
title_full_unstemmed An international study on implementation and facilitators and barriers for parent‐infant closeness in neonatal units
title_short An international study on implementation and facilitators and barriers for parent‐infant closeness in neonatal units
title_sort international study on implementation and facilitators and barriers for parent‐infant closeness in neonatal units
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9523817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36203512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ped4.12339
work_keys_str_mv AT vanveenendaalnicoler aninternationalstudyonimplementationandfacilitatorsandbarriersforparentinfantclosenessinneonatalunits
AT labrienanonhm aninternationalstudyonimplementationandfacilitatorsandbarriersforparentinfantclosenessinneonatalunits
AT madersilke aninternationalstudyonimplementationandfacilitatorsandbarriersforparentinfantclosenessinneonatalunits
AT vankempenanneamw aninternationalstudyonimplementationandfacilitatorsandbarriersforparentinfantclosenessinneonatalunits
AT vanderschoorsophierd aninternationalstudyonimplementationandfacilitatorsandbarriersforparentinfantclosenessinneonatalunits
AT vangoudoeverjohannesb aninternationalstudyonimplementationandfacilitatorsandbarriersforparentinfantclosenessinneonatalunits
AT aninternationalstudyonimplementationandfacilitatorsandbarriersforparentinfantclosenessinneonatalunits
AT vanveenendaalnicoler internationalstudyonimplementationandfacilitatorsandbarriersforparentinfantclosenessinneonatalunits
AT labrienanonhm internationalstudyonimplementationandfacilitatorsandbarriersforparentinfantclosenessinneonatalunits
AT madersilke internationalstudyonimplementationandfacilitatorsandbarriersforparentinfantclosenessinneonatalunits
AT vankempenanneamw internationalstudyonimplementationandfacilitatorsandbarriersforparentinfantclosenessinneonatalunits
AT vanderschoorsophierd internationalstudyonimplementationandfacilitatorsandbarriersforparentinfantclosenessinneonatalunits
AT vangoudoeverjohannesb internationalstudyonimplementationandfacilitatorsandbarriersforparentinfantclosenessinneonatalunits
AT internationalstudyonimplementationandfacilitatorsandbarriersforparentinfantclosenessinneonatalunits