Cargando…
Expanding relationship science to unpartnered singles: What predicts life satisfaction?
Singles are an understudied yet growing segment of the adult population. The current study aims to expand the lens of relationship science by examining the well-being of unpartnered, single adults using latent profile analysis. We recruited singles (N = 4,835) closely matched to the United States ce...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9523881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36186400 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904848 |
_version_ | 1784800385705181184 |
---|---|
author | Walsh, Lisa C. Gonzales, Ariana M. Shen, Lucy Rodriguez, Anthony Kaufman, Victor A. |
author_facet | Walsh, Lisa C. Gonzales, Ariana M. Shen, Lucy Rodriguez, Anthony Kaufman, Victor A. |
author_sort | Walsh, Lisa C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Singles are an understudied yet growing segment of the adult population. The current study aims to expand the lens of relationship science by examining the well-being of unpartnered, single adults using latent profile analysis. We recruited singles (N = 4,835) closely matched to the United States census (ages 18-65; 57.5% female; 71.1% White; 14.5% Black; 13.8% Hispanic) for an exploratory cross-sectional survey using five variables that strongly predict well-being (friendship satisfaction, family satisfaction, self-esteem, neuroticism, and extraversion). All five variables significantly predicted life satisfaction for the full sample. Latent profile analyses detected 10 groups (or profiles) of singles. Half of the profiles were happy (above the full sample mean of life satisfaction) and half of the profiles were unhappy (below the mean). Each profile had its own unique patterns relating to personal relationships, self-esteem, and personality traits. The happiest profile had the best relationships, self-esteem, and personality, while the unhappiest profile had the worst relationships, self-esteem, and personality. The profiles in between these two extremes had more nuanced patterns. For example, one relatively happy profile in the middle had high friendship satisfaction but low family satisfaction, while an adjacent profile showed the opposite pattern. Overall, singles who had positive relationships—both with themselves and others—were happiest. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9523881 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95238812022-10-01 Expanding relationship science to unpartnered singles: What predicts life satisfaction? Walsh, Lisa C. Gonzales, Ariana M. Shen, Lucy Rodriguez, Anthony Kaufman, Victor A. Front Psychol Psychology Singles are an understudied yet growing segment of the adult population. The current study aims to expand the lens of relationship science by examining the well-being of unpartnered, single adults using latent profile analysis. We recruited singles (N = 4,835) closely matched to the United States census (ages 18-65; 57.5% female; 71.1% White; 14.5% Black; 13.8% Hispanic) for an exploratory cross-sectional survey using five variables that strongly predict well-being (friendship satisfaction, family satisfaction, self-esteem, neuroticism, and extraversion). All five variables significantly predicted life satisfaction for the full sample. Latent profile analyses detected 10 groups (or profiles) of singles. Half of the profiles were happy (above the full sample mean of life satisfaction) and half of the profiles were unhappy (below the mean). Each profile had its own unique patterns relating to personal relationships, self-esteem, and personality traits. The happiest profile had the best relationships, self-esteem, and personality, while the unhappiest profile had the worst relationships, self-esteem, and personality. The profiles in between these two extremes had more nuanced patterns. For example, one relatively happy profile in the middle had high friendship satisfaction but low family satisfaction, while an adjacent profile showed the opposite pattern. Overall, singles who had positive relationships—both with themselves and others—were happiest. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9523881/ /pubmed/36186400 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904848 Text en Copyright © 2022 Walsh, Gonzales, Shen, Rodriguez and Kaufman. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Walsh, Lisa C. Gonzales, Ariana M. Shen, Lucy Rodriguez, Anthony Kaufman, Victor A. Expanding relationship science to unpartnered singles: What predicts life satisfaction? |
title | Expanding relationship science to unpartnered singles: What predicts life satisfaction? |
title_full | Expanding relationship science to unpartnered singles: What predicts life satisfaction? |
title_fullStr | Expanding relationship science to unpartnered singles: What predicts life satisfaction? |
title_full_unstemmed | Expanding relationship science to unpartnered singles: What predicts life satisfaction? |
title_short | Expanding relationship science to unpartnered singles: What predicts life satisfaction? |
title_sort | expanding relationship science to unpartnered singles: what predicts life satisfaction? |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9523881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36186400 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904848 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walshlisac expandingrelationshipsciencetounpartneredsingleswhatpredictslifesatisfaction AT gonzalesarianam expandingrelationshipsciencetounpartneredsingleswhatpredictslifesatisfaction AT shenlucy expandingrelationshipsciencetounpartneredsingleswhatpredictslifesatisfaction AT rodriguezanthony expandingrelationshipsciencetounpartneredsingleswhatpredictslifesatisfaction AT kaufmanvictora expandingrelationshipsciencetounpartneredsingleswhatpredictslifesatisfaction |