Cargando…

Analgesic efficacy of adding the IPACK block to multimodal analgesia protocol for primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a standard treatment for end-stage degenerative knee disease. Most patients will experience moderate-to-severe postoperative knee pain, significantly affecting rehabilitation. However, controversy remains regarding the efficacy of adding the interspace be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Xiumei, Lai, Yahao, Du, Siwei, Ning, Ning
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9523917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36175927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03266-3
_version_ 1784800394289872896
author Tang, Xiumei
Lai, Yahao
Du, Siwei
Ning, Ning
author_facet Tang, Xiumei
Lai, Yahao
Du, Siwei
Ning, Ning
author_sort Tang, Xiumei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a standard treatment for end-stage degenerative knee disease. Most patients will experience moderate-to-severe postoperative knee pain, significantly affecting rehabilitation. However, controversy remains regarding the efficacy of adding the interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) into multimodal analgesia protocol. METHODS: PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and other databases were searched from inception to February 1, 2021. Studies comparing patients receiving IPACK to patients not receiving IPACK were included. The primary outcome was the ambulation pain score on a visual analogue scale (VAS) of 0–10. Secondary outcomes included pain score at rest, morphine usage, functional recovery, clinical outcomes, and complications. RESULTS: Thirteen RCTs involving 1347 knees were included. IPACK was associated with lower ambulation pain scores (weight mean difference [WMD] − 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] − 0.72 to − 0.26). The benefits were observed from 2 to 4 h, 6 to 12 h, and beyond one week. IPACK also significantly reduced rest pain scores (WMD − 0.49, 95% CI − 0.74 to − 0.24), and the benefits were observed from 6 to 12 h and beyond one week. IPACK reduced the overall morphine consumption (WMD − 2.56, 95% CI − 4.63 to − 0.49). Subgroup analysis found reduced oral morphine consumption from 24 to 48 h (WMD − 2.98, 95% CI − 5.71 to − 0.24) and reduced rate of morphine requirement from 12 to 24 h (relative risk [RR] = 0.51, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.83). Functional recovery outcomes regarding ambulation distances (on the second postoperative day [POD2]) (WMD = 1.74, 95% CI 0.34 to 3.15) and quadriceps muscle strength (at 0 degree) (WMD = 0.41, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.77) favored IPACK. And IPACK reduced the rate of sleep disturbance (on POD 1) (RR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.81). There was no significant difference in the other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-level evidence confirmed that IPACK was related to better results in pain scores, morphine usage, and functional recovery without increasing the risk of complications. REGISTRATION: CRD42021252156. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-03266-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9523917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95239172022-10-01 Analgesic efficacy of adding the IPACK block to multimodal analgesia protocol for primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Tang, Xiumei Lai, Yahao Du, Siwei Ning, Ning J Orthop Surg Res Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a standard treatment for end-stage degenerative knee disease. Most patients will experience moderate-to-severe postoperative knee pain, significantly affecting rehabilitation. However, controversy remains regarding the efficacy of adding the interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) into multimodal analgesia protocol. METHODS: PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and other databases were searched from inception to February 1, 2021. Studies comparing patients receiving IPACK to patients not receiving IPACK were included. The primary outcome was the ambulation pain score on a visual analogue scale (VAS) of 0–10. Secondary outcomes included pain score at rest, morphine usage, functional recovery, clinical outcomes, and complications. RESULTS: Thirteen RCTs involving 1347 knees were included. IPACK was associated with lower ambulation pain scores (weight mean difference [WMD] − 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] − 0.72 to − 0.26). The benefits were observed from 2 to 4 h, 6 to 12 h, and beyond one week. IPACK also significantly reduced rest pain scores (WMD − 0.49, 95% CI − 0.74 to − 0.24), and the benefits were observed from 6 to 12 h and beyond one week. IPACK reduced the overall morphine consumption (WMD − 2.56, 95% CI − 4.63 to − 0.49). Subgroup analysis found reduced oral morphine consumption from 24 to 48 h (WMD − 2.98, 95% CI − 5.71 to − 0.24) and reduced rate of morphine requirement from 12 to 24 h (relative risk [RR] = 0.51, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.83). Functional recovery outcomes regarding ambulation distances (on the second postoperative day [POD2]) (WMD = 1.74, 95% CI 0.34 to 3.15) and quadriceps muscle strength (at 0 degree) (WMD = 0.41, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.77) favored IPACK. And IPACK reduced the rate of sleep disturbance (on POD 1) (RR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.81). There was no significant difference in the other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-level evidence confirmed that IPACK was related to better results in pain scores, morphine usage, and functional recovery without increasing the risk of complications. REGISTRATION: CRD42021252156. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-03266-3. BioMed Central 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9523917/ /pubmed/36175927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03266-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Tang, Xiumei
Lai, Yahao
Du, Siwei
Ning, Ning
Analgesic efficacy of adding the IPACK block to multimodal analgesia protocol for primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Analgesic efficacy of adding the IPACK block to multimodal analgesia protocol for primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Analgesic efficacy of adding the IPACK block to multimodal analgesia protocol for primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Analgesic efficacy of adding the IPACK block to multimodal analgesia protocol for primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Analgesic efficacy of adding the IPACK block to multimodal analgesia protocol for primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Analgesic efficacy of adding the IPACK block to multimodal analgesia protocol for primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort analgesic efficacy of adding the ipack block to multimodal analgesia protocol for primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9523917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36175927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03266-3
work_keys_str_mv AT tangxiumei analgesicefficacyofaddingtheipackblocktomultimodalanalgesiaprotocolforprimarytotalkneearthroplastyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT laiyahao analgesicefficacyofaddingtheipackblocktomultimodalanalgesiaprotocolforprimarytotalkneearthroplastyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT dusiwei analgesicefficacyofaddingtheipackblocktomultimodalanalgesiaprotocolforprimarytotalkneearthroplastyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT ningning analgesicefficacyofaddingtheipackblocktomultimodalanalgesiaprotocolforprimarytotalkneearthroplastyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials