Cargando…
What is the most appropriate method for the measurement of the range of motion in the lumbar spine and how does surgical fixation affect the range of movement of the lumbar spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A systematic review protocol
INTRODUCTION: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional rotational change in the normal shape of the spine which affects children aged 10 to 18 years. Both the condition and its management can have significant impact on functional ability. Currently, expected restriction in spinal...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9523991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36180881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02077-1 |
_version_ | 1784800410040532992 |
---|---|
author | Hartley, Laura Zappalà, Mattia Ehiogu, Uzo Heneghan, Nicola R. Gardner, Adrian |
author_facet | Hartley, Laura Zappalà, Mattia Ehiogu, Uzo Heneghan, Nicola R. Gardner, Adrian |
author_sort | Hartley, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional rotational change in the normal shape of the spine which affects children aged 10 to 18 years. Both the condition and its management can have significant impact on functional ability. Currently, expected restriction in spinal motion is experience based, rather than evidence based, and discussions to inform patient expectations pre-operatively can be difficult. The aim of this review is to evaluate the evidence pertaining to measurement of spinal motion and whether this is altered following surgery, dependent on the anatomical level of surgical fixation in AIS. METHODS/ANALYSIS: This protocol is reported in line with both PRISMA-P and informed by the COSMIN methodology. Electronic databases will be searched using a two-stage search strategy. The first stage will identify and evaluate the methods used to assess spinal motion. The second stage aims to evaluate the change in spinal motion using these methods based on anatomical level of fixation following surgery along with the measurement properties of those methods, to include the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the methods. Two reviewers will independently screen the search results against eligibility criteria, extract the data and assess the quality of the included studies. Any disputes between the reviewers will be resolved with a third independent reviewer. Data may be pooled where possible; however, this is not expected. The overall strength of the body of evidence will then be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: Patients and members of the public will not be consulted in the production of this review, although the review was conceived based on the experiences of the authors when managing this patient population and a need to address patient expectations in pre-operative planning. ETHICS, DISSEMINATION AND DATA AVAILABILITY: No ethical approval required. The final review will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals for publication and disseminated publicly. The datasets used and/or analysed in this review will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number. CRD42021282264. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-022-02077-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9523991 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95239912022-10-01 What is the most appropriate method for the measurement of the range of motion in the lumbar spine and how does surgical fixation affect the range of movement of the lumbar spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A systematic review protocol Hartley, Laura Zappalà, Mattia Ehiogu, Uzo Heneghan, Nicola R. Gardner, Adrian Syst Rev Protocol INTRODUCTION: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional rotational change in the normal shape of the spine which affects children aged 10 to 18 years. Both the condition and its management can have significant impact on functional ability. Currently, expected restriction in spinal motion is experience based, rather than evidence based, and discussions to inform patient expectations pre-operatively can be difficult. The aim of this review is to evaluate the evidence pertaining to measurement of spinal motion and whether this is altered following surgery, dependent on the anatomical level of surgical fixation in AIS. METHODS/ANALYSIS: This protocol is reported in line with both PRISMA-P and informed by the COSMIN methodology. Electronic databases will be searched using a two-stage search strategy. The first stage will identify and evaluate the methods used to assess spinal motion. The second stage aims to evaluate the change in spinal motion using these methods based on anatomical level of fixation following surgery along with the measurement properties of those methods, to include the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the methods. Two reviewers will independently screen the search results against eligibility criteria, extract the data and assess the quality of the included studies. Any disputes between the reviewers will be resolved with a third independent reviewer. Data may be pooled where possible; however, this is not expected. The overall strength of the body of evidence will then be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: Patients and members of the public will not be consulted in the production of this review, although the review was conceived based on the experiences of the authors when managing this patient population and a need to address patient expectations in pre-operative planning. ETHICS, DISSEMINATION AND DATA AVAILABILITY: No ethical approval required. The final review will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals for publication and disseminated publicly. The datasets used and/or analysed in this review will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number. CRD42021282264. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-022-02077-1. BioMed Central 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9523991/ /pubmed/36180881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02077-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Hartley, Laura Zappalà, Mattia Ehiogu, Uzo Heneghan, Nicola R. Gardner, Adrian What is the most appropriate method for the measurement of the range of motion in the lumbar spine and how does surgical fixation affect the range of movement of the lumbar spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A systematic review protocol |
title | What is the most appropriate method for the measurement of the range of motion in the lumbar spine and how does surgical fixation affect the range of movement of the lumbar spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A systematic review protocol |
title_full | What is the most appropriate method for the measurement of the range of motion in the lumbar spine and how does surgical fixation affect the range of movement of the lumbar spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A systematic review protocol |
title_fullStr | What is the most appropriate method for the measurement of the range of motion in the lumbar spine and how does surgical fixation affect the range of movement of the lumbar spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A systematic review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | What is the most appropriate method for the measurement of the range of motion in the lumbar spine and how does surgical fixation affect the range of movement of the lumbar spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A systematic review protocol |
title_short | What is the most appropriate method for the measurement of the range of motion in the lumbar spine and how does surgical fixation affect the range of movement of the lumbar spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A systematic review protocol |
title_sort | what is the most appropriate method for the measurement of the range of motion in the lumbar spine and how does surgical fixation affect the range of movement of the lumbar spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? a systematic review protocol |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9523991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36180881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02077-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hartleylaura whatisthemostappropriatemethodforthemeasurementoftherangeofmotioninthelumbarspineandhowdoessurgicalfixationaffecttherangeofmovementofthelumbarspineinadolescentidiopathicscoliosisasystematicreviewprotocol AT zappalamattia whatisthemostappropriatemethodforthemeasurementoftherangeofmotioninthelumbarspineandhowdoessurgicalfixationaffecttherangeofmovementofthelumbarspineinadolescentidiopathicscoliosisasystematicreviewprotocol AT ehioguuzo whatisthemostappropriatemethodforthemeasurementoftherangeofmotioninthelumbarspineandhowdoessurgicalfixationaffecttherangeofmovementofthelumbarspineinadolescentidiopathicscoliosisasystematicreviewprotocol AT heneghannicolar whatisthemostappropriatemethodforthemeasurementoftherangeofmotioninthelumbarspineandhowdoessurgicalfixationaffecttherangeofmovementofthelumbarspineinadolescentidiopathicscoliosisasystematicreviewprotocol AT gardneradrian whatisthemostappropriatemethodforthemeasurementoftherangeofmotioninthelumbarspineandhowdoessurgicalfixationaffecttherangeofmovementofthelumbarspineinadolescentidiopathicscoliosisasystematicreviewprotocol |