Cargando…

Patient-specific three-dimensional evaluation of interface micromotion in two different short stem designs in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of micromotion in various activities in daily life is essential to the assessment of the initial fixation of cementless short stems in total hip arthroplasty. This study sought to evaluate three-dimensionally the micromotion of two types of cementless short stems. METHODS: Two...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kanaizumi, Arata, Suzuki, Daisuke, Nagoya, Satoshi, Teramoto, Atsushi, Yamashita, Toshihiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36175915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03329-5
_version_ 1784800415054823424
author Kanaizumi, Arata
Suzuki, Daisuke
Nagoya, Satoshi
Teramoto, Atsushi
Yamashita, Toshihiko
author_facet Kanaizumi, Arata
Suzuki, Daisuke
Nagoya, Satoshi
Teramoto, Atsushi
Yamashita, Toshihiko
author_sort Kanaizumi, Arata
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evaluation of micromotion in various activities in daily life is essential to the assessment of the initial fixation of cementless short stems in total hip arthroplasty. This study sought to evaluate three-dimensionally the micromotion of two types of cementless short stems. METHODS: Two types of stems were used: the Fitmore stem with a rectangular cross-section (rectangular stem) and the octagonal-oval GTS stem with fins (finned stem). Finite element analysis was used to calculate the micromotion of two activities that place a heavy load on the stem (single-leg stance and stair climbing). Three values were measured: the magnitude of micromotion (mean and 95th percentile), the location of micromotion above the 95th percentile value, and the directions of the micromotion vector. RESULTS: 1. There was no significant difference in the magnitude of the micromotion between the rectangular stem and finned stem groups for single-leg stance or stair climbing. 2. In both groups, the micromotion was greatest at the proximal and distal ends. 3. The direction of the micromotion was similar in both groups; internal rotation occurred from the distal to the middle of the stem during stair climbing. CONCLUSIONS: The rectangular stem had comparable initial fixation to that of the finned stem. In both models, the micromotion was greater at the proximal and distal ends. The direction of the micromotion was not dependent on the stem shape but on the direction of the load on the artificial femoral head. These results will be important for stem selection and future stem development. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-03329-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9524017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95240172022-10-01 Patient-specific three-dimensional evaluation of interface micromotion in two different short stem designs in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a finite element analysis Kanaizumi, Arata Suzuki, Daisuke Nagoya, Satoshi Teramoto, Atsushi Yamashita, Toshihiko J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Evaluation of micromotion in various activities in daily life is essential to the assessment of the initial fixation of cementless short stems in total hip arthroplasty. This study sought to evaluate three-dimensionally the micromotion of two types of cementless short stems. METHODS: Two types of stems were used: the Fitmore stem with a rectangular cross-section (rectangular stem) and the octagonal-oval GTS stem with fins (finned stem). Finite element analysis was used to calculate the micromotion of two activities that place a heavy load on the stem (single-leg stance and stair climbing). Three values were measured: the magnitude of micromotion (mean and 95th percentile), the location of micromotion above the 95th percentile value, and the directions of the micromotion vector. RESULTS: 1. There was no significant difference in the magnitude of the micromotion between the rectangular stem and finned stem groups for single-leg stance or stair climbing. 2. In both groups, the micromotion was greatest at the proximal and distal ends. 3. The direction of the micromotion was similar in both groups; internal rotation occurred from the distal to the middle of the stem during stair climbing. CONCLUSIONS: The rectangular stem had comparable initial fixation to that of the finned stem. In both models, the micromotion was greater at the proximal and distal ends. The direction of the micromotion was not dependent on the stem shape but on the direction of the load on the artificial femoral head. These results will be important for stem selection and future stem development. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-03329-5. BioMed Central 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9524017/ /pubmed/36175915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03329-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kanaizumi, Arata
Suzuki, Daisuke
Nagoya, Satoshi
Teramoto, Atsushi
Yamashita, Toshihiko
Patient-specific three-dimensional evaluation of interface micromotion in two different short stem designs in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a finite element analysis
title Patient-specific three-dimensional evaluation of interface micromotion in two different short stem designs in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a finite element analysis
title_full Patient-specific three-dimensional evaluation of interface micromotion in two different short stem designs in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a finite element analysis
title_fullStr Patient-specific three-dimensional evaluation of interface micromotion in two different short stem designs in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed Patient-specific three-dimensional evaluation of interface micromotion in two different short stem designs in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a finite element analysis
title_short Patient-specific three-dimensional evaluation of interface micromotion in two different short stem designs in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a finite element analysis
title_sort patient-specific three-dimensional evaluation of interface micromotion in two different short stem designs in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a finite element analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36175915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03329-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kanaizumiarata patientspecificthreedimensionalevaluationofinterfacemicromotionintwodifferentshortstemdesignsincementlesstotalhiparthroplastyafiniteelementanalysis
AT suzukidaisuke patientspecificthreedimensionalevaluationofinterfacemicromotionintwodifferentshortstemdesignsincementlesstotalhiparthroplastyafiniteelementanalysis
AT nagoyasatoshi patientspecificthreedimensionalevaluationofinterfacemicromotionintwodifferentshortstemdesignsincementlesstotalhiparthroplastyafiniteelementanalysis
AT teramotoatsushi patientspecificthreedimensionalevaluationofinterfacemicromotionintwodifferentshortstemdesignsincementlesstotalhiparthroplastyafiniteelementanalysis
AT yamashitatoshihiko patientspecificthreedimensionalevaluationofinterfacemicromotionintwodifferentshortstemdesignsincementlesstotalhiparthroplastyafiniteelementanalysis