Cargando…

Comparison between acupotomy and corticosteroid injection for patients diagnosed with different classifications of tennis elbow: a randomized control trial

BACKGROUND: Tennis elbow has long been one of the most controversial subjects in orthopaedics. Many scholars thought the use of open or arthroscopic surgery was reserved for patients with refractory symptoms. Therapy with percutaneous acupotomy performed under local anaesthesia also removes degenera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ge, Lin-Pu, Liu, Xiao-Qian, Zhang, Rui-Kun, Chen, Zhi-Neng, Cheng, Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36175902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03323-x
_version_ 1784800428296241152
author Ge, Lin-Pu
Liu, Xiao-Qian
Zhang, Rui-Kun
Chen, Zhi-Neng
Cheng, Feng
author_facet Ge, Lin-Pu
Liu, Xiao-Qian
Zhang, Rui-Kun
Chen, Zhi-Neng
Cheng, Feng
author_sort Ge, Lin-Pu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tennis elbow has long been one of the most controversial subjects in orthopaedics. Many scholars thought the use of open or arthroscopic surgery was reserved for patients with refractory symptoms. Therapy with percutaneous acupotomy performed under local anaesthesia also removes degenerated tissue, releases strain, and therefore provides an alternative treatment option to surgical excision. METHODS: The aim of this single-blinded randomized control trial was to examine the long-term clinical effectiveness of a nonsurgical percutaneous release technique (acupotomy) and the current recommended treatment (steroid injection) in people diagnosed with a refractory tennis elbow. Ninety patients with refractory symptoms were included. The intervention period was 6 weeks. According to the classification, 38 patients had extra-articular tennis elbow, 36 patients had intraarticular tennis elbow, and 16 patients had mixed type tennis elbow. Forty-five patients were randomly assigned to treatment with percutaneous release by acupotomy according to their classified condition, and 45 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with steroid injection alone. The visual analogue scale (VAS), a tenderness assessment, a grip assessment, and the Nirschl staging system were used for outcome evaluation at pretreatment and the posttreatment timepoints from 12 to 48 weeks. RESULTS: During the first weeks, there were no differences observed between the groups. By 6, 24 and 48 weeks, significant differences were observed between the two groups. The acupotomy group scored significantly better in visual analogue scale score (VAS) of pain, tenderness during palpation, pain-free grip strength (PFGS) and Nirschl staging than the corticosteroid group. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with lateral epicondylitis, acupotomy is just as effective as corticosteroid injections in the short term (< 6 weeks). In the long term, acupotomy has greater efficacy and is associated with a lower rate of recurrence than corticosteroid injections in the management of lateral epicondylitis. Trial registration: The National Health Commission announced the "ethical review measures for biomedical research involving people" in 2019, which was not mandatory in previous studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9524077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95240772022-10-01 Comparison between acupotomy and corticosteroid injection for patients diagnosed with different classifications of tennis elbow: a randomized control trial Ge, Lin-Pu Liu, Xiao-Qian Zhang, Rui-Kun Chen, Zhi-Neng Cheng, Feng J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Tennis elbow has long been one of the most controversial subjects in orthopaedics. Many scholars thought the use of open or arthroscopic surgery was reserved for patients with refractory symptoms. Therapy with percutaneous acupotomy performed under local anaesthesia also removes degenerated tissue, releases strain, and therefore provides an alternative treatment option to surgical excision. METHODS: The aim of this single-blinded randomized control trial was to examine the long-term clinical effectiveness of a nonsurgical percutaneous release technique (acupotomy) and the current recommended treatment (steroid injection) in people diagnosed with a refractory tennis elbow. Ninety patients with refractory symptoms were included. The intervention period was 6 weeks. According to the classification, 38 patients had extra-articular tennis elbow, 36 patients had intraarticular tennis elbow, and 16 patients had mixed type tennis elbow. Forty-five patients were randomly assigned to treatment with percutaneous release by acupotomy according to their classified condition, and 45 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with steroid injection alone. The visual analogue scale (VAS), a tenderness assessment, a grip assessment, and the Nirschl staging system were used for outcome evaluation at pretreatment and the posttreatment timepoints from 12 to 48 weeks. RESULTS: During the first weeks, there were no differences observed between the groups. By 6, 24 and 48 weeks, significant differences were observed between the two groups. The acupotomy group scored significantly better in visual analogue scale score (VAS) of pain, tenderness during palpation, pain-free grip strength (PFGS) and Nirschl staging than the corticosteroid group. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with lateral epicondylitis, acupotomy is just as effective as corticosteroid injections in the short term (< 6 weeks). In the long term, acupotomy has greater efficacy and is associated with a lower rate of recurrence than corticosteroid injections in the management of lateral epicondylitis. Trial registration: The National Health Commission announced the "ethical review measures for biomedical research involving people" in 2019, which was not mandatory in previous studies. BioMed Central 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9524077/ /pubmed/36175902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03323-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ge, Lin-Pu
Liu, Xiao-Qian
Zhang, Rui-Kun
Chen, Zhi-Neng
Cheng, Feng
Comparison between acupotomy and corticosteroid injection for patients diagnosed with different classifications of tennis elbow: a randomized control trial
title Comparison between acupotomy and corticosteroid injection for patients diagnosed with different classifications of tennis elbow: a randomized control trial
title_full Comparison between acupotomy and corticosteroid injection for patients diagnosed with different classifications of tennis elbow: a randomized control trial
title_fullStr Comparison between acupotomy and corticosteroid injection for patients diagnosed with different classifications of tennis elbow: a randomized control trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between acupotomy and corticosteroid injection for patients diagnosed with different classifications of tennis elbow: a randomized control trial
title_short Comparison between acupotomy and corticosteroid injection for patients diagnosed with different classifications of tennis elbow: a randomized control trial
title_sort comparison between acupotomy and corticosteroid injection for patients diagnosed with different classifications of tennis elbow: a randomized control trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36175902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03323-x
work_keys_str_mv AT gelinpu comparisonbetweenacupotomyandcorticosteroidinjectionforpatientsdiagnosedwithdifferentclassificationsoftenniselbowarandomizedcontroltrial
AT liuxiaoqian comparisonbetweenacupotomyandcorticosteroidinjectionforpatientsdiagnosedwithdifferentclassificationsoftenniselbowarandomizedcontroltrial
AT zhangruikun comparisonbetweenacupotomyandcorticosteroidinjectionforpatientsdiagnosedwithdifferentclassificationsoftenniselbowarandomizedcontroltrial
AT chenzhineng comparisonbetweenacupotomyandcorticosteroidinjectionforpatientsdiagnosedwithdifferentclassificationsoftenniselbowarandomizedcontroltrial
AT chengfeng comparisonbetweenacupotomyandcorticosteroidinjectionforpatientsdiagnosedwithdifferentclassificationsoftenniselbowarandomizedcontroltrial