Cargando…
Scientific rewards for biomedical specialization are large and persistent
BACKGROUND: While specialization plays an essential role in how scientific research is pursued, we understand little about its effects on a researcher’s impact and career. In particular, the extent to which one specializes within their chosen fields likely has complex relationships with productivity...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36175953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-022-01400-5 |
_version_ | 1784800438162292736 |
---|---|
author | de Rassenfosse, Gaétan Higham, Kyle Penner, Orion |
author_facet | de Rassenfosse, Gaétan Higham, Kyle Penner, Orion |
author_sort | de Rassenfosse, Gaétan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While specialization plays an essential role in how scientific research is pursued, we understand little about its effects on a researcher’s impact and career. In particular, the extent to which one specializes within their chosen fields likely has complex relationships with productivity, career stage, and eventual impact. Here, we develop a novel and fine-grained approach for measuring a researcher’s level of specialization at each point in their career and apply it to the publication data of almost 30,000 established biomedical researchers to measure the effect that specialization has on the impact of a researcher’s publications. RESULTS: Using a within-researcher, panel-based econometric framework, we arrive at several important results. First, there are significant scientific rewards for specialization—25% more citations per standard deviation increase in specialization. Second, these benefits are much higher early in a researcher’s career—as large as 75% per standard deviation increase in specialization. Third, rewards are higher for researchers who publish few papers relative to their peers. Finally, we find that, all else equal, researchers who make large changes in their research direction see generally increased impact. CONCLUSIONS: The extent to which one specializes, particularly at the early stages of a biomedical research career, appears to play a significant role in determining the citation-based impact of their publications. When this measure of impact is, implicitly or explicitly, an input into decision-making processes within the scientific system (for example, for job opportunities, promotions, or invited talks), these findings lead to some important implications for the system-level organization of scientific research and the incentives that exist therein. We propose several mechanisms within modern scientific systems that likely lead to the scientific rewards we observe and discuss them within the broader context of reward structures in biomedicine and science more generally. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9524129 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95241292022-10-01 Scientific rewards for biomedical specialization are large and persistent de Rassenfosse, Gaétan Higham, Kyle Penner, Orion BMC Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: While specialization plays an essential role in how scientific research is pursued, we understand little about its effects on a researcher’s impact and career. In particular, the extent to which one specializes within their chosen fields likely has complex relationships with productivity, career stage, and eventual impact. Here, we develop a novel and fine-grained approach for measuring a researcher’s level of specialization at each point in their career and apply it to the publication data of almost 30,000 established biomedical researchers to measure the effect that specialization has on the impact of a researcher’s publications. RESULTS: Using a within-researcher, panel-based econometric framework, we arrive at several important results. First, there are significant scientific rewards for specialization—25% more citations per standard deviation increase in specialization. Second, these benefits are much higher early in a researcher’s career—as large as 75% per standard deviation increase in specialization. Third, rewards are higher for researchers who publish few papers relative to their peers. Finally, we find that, all else equal, researchers who make large changes in their research direction see generally increased impact. CONCLUSIONS: The extent to which one specializes, particularly at the early stages of a biomedical research career, appears to play a significant role in determining the citation-based impact of their publications. When this measure of impact is, implicitly or explicitly, an input into decision-making processes within the scientific system (for example, for job opportunities, promotions, or invited talks), these findings lead to some important implications for the system-level organization of scientific research and the incentives that exist therein. We propose several mechanisms within modern scientific systems that likely lead to the scientific rewards we observe and discuss them within the broader context of reward structures in biomedicine and science more generally. BioMed Central 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9524129/ /pubmed/36175953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-022-01400-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article de Rassenfosse, Gaétan Higham, Kyle Penner, Orion Scientific rewards for biomedical specialization are large and persistent |
title | Scientific rewards for biomedical specialization are large and persistent |
title_full | Scientific rewards for biomedical specialization are large and persistent |
title_fullStr | Scientific rewards for biomedical specialization are large and persistent |
title_full_unstemmed | Scientific rewards for biomedical specialization are large and persistent |
title_short | Scientific rewards for biomedical specialization are large and persistent |
title_sort | scientific rewards for biomedical specialization are large and persistent |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36175953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-022-01400-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT derassenfossegaetan scientificrewardsforbiomedicalspecializationarelargeandpersistent AT highamkyle scientificrewardsforbiomedicalspecializationarelargeandpersistent AT pennerorion scientificrewardsforbiomedicalspecializationarelargeandpersistent |