Cargando…

Optical coherence tomography assessment of axonal and neuronal damage of the retina in patients with familial and sporadic multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVE: To assess axonal and neuronal damage of the retina in patients with familial (fMS) and sporadic multiple sclerosis (sMS). METHODS: 87 relapsing-remitting MS patients (45 patients with sMS, 42 patients with fMS) and 30 healthy controls were included in the study. Optical coherence tomograp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grudziecka Pyrek, Monika, Selmaj, Krzysztof
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36188381
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.953188
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To assess axonal and neuronal damage of the retina in patients with familial (fMS) and sporadic multiple sclerosis (sMS). METHODS: 87 relapsing-remitting MS patients (45 patients with sMS, 42 patients with fMS) and 30 healthy controls were included in the study. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed with the spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT, Heidelberg Engineering, Germany). The peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness, ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness, total macular volume (TMV) and the inner nuclear layer (INL) thickness were measured. RESULTS: A significant reduction of the pRNFL thickness was detected in sMS and fMS compared to the control group (86.29 (+/- 16.13) μm in sMS, 84.78 (+/- 12.92) μm in fMS, 98.93 (+/- 6.71) μm in control group; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the pRNFL thickness between sMS and fMS (p = 0.5239). The GCIPL thickness was significantly decreased in sMS and fMS compared to the control group [66.0581 (+/- 11.2674) μm in sMS, 63.8386 (+/-10.004) μm in fMS, 76.5074 (+/- 5.0004) μm in control group; p < 0.001]. A significant reduction of the TMV was shown in sMS and fMS compared to the control group [8.4541(+/- 0.4727) mm3 in sMS, 8.3612 (+/- 0.4448) mm3 in fMS, 8.8387 (+/- 0.314) mm3 in control group; p < 0.0011]. No difference in the GCIPL thickness and TMV between sMS and fMS was found (p = 0.3689 and p = 0.3758, respectively). The INL thickness in sMS and fMS did not differ compared to the control group [34.2323 (+/- 2.7006) μm in sMS, 34.5159 (+/- 2.9780) μm in fMS, 33.6148 (+/- 2.0811) μm in control group; p = 0.5971 and p = 0.1870, respectively] and between the two forms (p = 0.4894). CONCLUSION: We confirmed the presence of axonal and neuronal damage of the retina in sMS and fMS. Both forms of MS did not differ significantly from each other with respect to RFNL, GCIPL, MV and INL. ON induced significant reduction of the pRNFL, GCIPL and MV in both groups of pwMS.