Cargando…

Assessment of information as regards the toxicity of T‐2 and HT‐2 toxin for ruminants

In 2011, the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) adopted a Scientific Opinion on the risks for animal health related to the presence of T‐2 (T2) and HT‐2 (HT2) toxin in food and feed. No observed adverse effect levels (NOAELs) and lowest observed adverse effect levels (LOAELs) were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schrenk, Dieter, Bignami, Margherita, Bodin, Laurent, Chipman, James Kevin, del Mazo, Jesús, Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina, Hogstrand, Christer, Leblanc, Jean‐Charles, Nielsen, Elsa, Ntzani, Evangelia, Petersen, Annette, Sand, Salomon, Schwerdtle, Tanja, Vleminckx, Christiane, Wallace, Heather, Daenicke, Sven, Nebbia, Carlo Stefano, Oswald, Isabelle P, Rovesti, Elena, Steinkellner, Hans, Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron)
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36204158
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7564
_version_ 1784800514704146432
author Schrenk, Dieter
Bignami, Margherita
Bodin, Laurent
Chipman, James Kevin
del Mazo, Jesús
Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina
Hogstrand, Christer
Leblanc, Jean‐Charles
Nielsen, Elsa
Ntzani, Evangelia
Petersen, Annette
Sand, Salomon
Schwerdtle, Tanja
Vleminckx, Christiane
Wallace, Heather
Daenicke, Sven
Nebbia, Carlo Stefano
Oswald, Isabelle P
Rovesti, Elena
Steinkellner, Hans
Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron)
author_facet Schrenk, Dieter
Bignami, Margherita
Bodin, Laurent
Chipman, James Kevin
del Mazo, Jesús
Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina
Hogstrand, Christer
Leblanc, Jean‐Charles
Nielsen, Elsa
Ntzani, Evangelia
Petersen, Annette
Sand, Salomon
Schwerdtle, Tanja
Vleminckx, Christiane
Wallace, Heather
Daenicke, Sven
Nebbia, Carlo Stefano
Oswald, Isabelle P
Rovesti, Elena
Steinkellner, Hans
Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron)
collection PubMed
description In 2011, the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) adopted a Scientific Opinion on the risks for animal health related to the presence of T‐2 (T2) and HT‐2 (HT2) toxin in food and feed. No observed adverse effect levels (NOAELs) and lowest observed adverse effect levels (LOAELs) were derived for different animal species. In ruminants a LOAEL was established for the sum of T2 and HT2 of 0.3 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day, based on studies with calves and lambs. The CONTAM Panel noted that the effects observed in nutritionally challenged heifers and ewes give rise to the assumption that rumen detoxification of T2 may not always be complete and therefore effective to prevent adverse effects in ruminants. However, the limited data on the effects of T2 on adult ruminants did not allow a conclusion. The European Commission requested EFSA to review the information regarding the toxicity of T2 and HT2 for ruminants and to revise, if necessary, the established Reference Point (RP). Adverse effect levels of 0.001 and 0.01 mg T2/kg bw per day for, respectively, sheep and cows, were derived from case studies, estimated to correspond to feed concentrations of 0.035 mg T2/kg for sheep and 0.6 mg T2/kg for cows. RPs for adverse animal health effects of 0.01 mg/kg feed for sheep and 0.2 mg/kg feed for cows were established. For goats, the RP for cows was selected, in the absence of data that they are more sensitive. Based on mean exposure estimates performed in the previous Opinion, the risk of adverse health effects of feeds containing T2 and HT2 was considered a concern for lactating sheep. For milking goats, a comparison performed between dietary exposure and the RP derived for cows, indicates a potential risk for adverse health effects. For dairy cows and fattening beef, the risk is considered low.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9524474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95244742022-10-05 Assessment of information as regards the toxicity of T‐2 and HT‐2 toxin for ruminants Schrenk, Dieter Bignami, Margherita Bodin, Laurent Chipman, James Kevin del Mazo, Jesús Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina Hogstrand, Christer Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Nielsen, Elsa Ntzani, Evangelia Petersen, Annette Sand, Salomon Schwerdtle, Tanja Vleminckx, Christiane Wallace, Heather Daenicke, Sven Nebbia, Carlo Stefano Oswald, Isabelle P Rovesti, Elena Steinkellner, Hans Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron) EFSA J Scientific Opinion In 2011, the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) adopted a Scientific Opinion on the risks for animal health related to the presence of T‐2 (T2) and HT‐2 (HT2) toxin in food and feed. No observed adverse effect levels (NOAELs) and lowest observed adverse effect levels (LOAELs) were derived for different animal species. In ruminants a LOAEL was established for the sum of T2 and HT2 of 0.3 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day, based on studies with calves and lambs. The CONTAM Panel noted that the effects observed in nutritionally challenged heifers and ewes give rise to the assumption that rumen detoxification of T2 may not always be complete and therefore effective to prevent adverse effects in ruminants. However, the limited data on the effects of T2 on adult ruminants did not allow a conclusion. The European Commission requested EFSA to review the information regarding the toxicity of T2 and HT2 for ruminants and to revise, if necessary, the established Reference Point (RP). Adverse effect levels of 0.001 and 0.01 mg T2/kg bw per day for, respectively, sheep and cows, were derived from case studies, estimated to correspond to feed concentrations of 0.035 mg T2/kg for sheep and 0.6 mg T2/kg for cows. RPs for adverse animal health effects of 0.01 mg/kg feed for sheep and 0.2 mg/kg feed for cows were established. For goats, the RP for cows was selected, in the absence of data that they are more sensitive. Based on mean exposure estimates performed in the previous Opinion, the risk of adverse health effects of feeds containing T2 and HT2 was considered a concern for lactating sheep. For milking goats, a comparison performed between dietary exposure and the RP derived for cows, indicates a potential risk for adverse health effects. For dairy cows and fattening beef, the risk is considered low. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9524474/ /pubmed/36204158 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7564 Text en © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Schrenk, Dieter
Bignami, Margherita
Bodin, Laurent
Chipman, James Kevin
del Mazo, Jesús
Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina
Hogstrand, Christer
Leblanc, Jean‐Charles
Nielsen, Elsa
Ntzani, Evangelia
Petersen, Annette
Sand, Salomon
Schwerdtle, Tanja
Vleminckx, Christiane
Wallace, Heather
Daenicke, Sven
Nebbia, Carlo Stefano
Oswald, Isabelle P
Rovesti, Elena
Steinkellner, Hans
Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron)
Assessment of information as regards the toxicity of T‐2 and HT‐2 toxin for ruminants
title Assessment of information as regards the toxicity of T‐2 and HT‐2 toxin for ruminants
title_full Assessment of information as regards the toxicity of T‐2 and HT‐2 toxin for ruminants
title_fullStr Assessment of information as regards the toxicity of T‐2 and HT‐2 toxin for ruminants
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of information as regards the toxicity of T‐2 and HT‐2 toxin for ruminants
title_short Assessment of information as regards the toxicity of T‐2 and HT‐2 toxin for ruminants
title_sort assessment of information as regards the toxicity of t‐2 and ht‐2 toxin for ruminants
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36204158
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7564
work_keys_str_mv AT assessmentofinformationasregardsthetoxicityoft2andht2toxinforruminants
AT schrenkdieter assessmentofinformationasregardsthetoxicityoft2andht2toxinforruminants
AT bignamimargherita assessmentofinformationasregardsthetoxicityoft2andht2toxinforruminants
AT bodinlaurent assessmentofinformationasregardsthetoxicityoft2andht2toxinforruminants
AT chipmanjameskevin assessmentofinformationasregardsthetoxicityoft2andht2toxinforruminants
AT delmazojesus assessmentofinformationasregardsthetoxicityoft2andht2toxinforruminants
AT graslkrauppbettina assessmentofinformationasregardsthetoxicityoft2andht2toxinforruminants
AT hogstrandchrister assessmentofinformationasregardsthetoxicityoft2andht2toxinforruminants
AT leblancjeancharles assessmentofinformationasregardsthetoxicityoft2andht2toxinforruminants
AT nielsenelsa assessmentofinformationasregardsthetoxicityoft2andht2toxinforruminants
AT ntzanievangelia assessmentofinformationasregardsthetoxicityoft2andht2toxinforruminants
AT petersenannette assessmentofinformationasregardsthetoxicityoft2andht2toxinforruminants
AT sandsalomon assessmentofinformationasregardsthetoxicityoft2andht2toxinforruminants
AT schwerdtletanja assessmentofinformationasregardsthetoxicityoft2andht2toxinforruminants
AT vleminckxchristiane assessmentofinformationasregardsthetoxicityoft2andht2toxinforruminants
AT wallaceheather assessmentofinformationasregardsthetoxicityoft2andht2toxinforruminants
AT daenickesven assessmentofinformationasregardsthetoxicityoft2andht2toxinforruminants
AT nebbiacarlostefano assessmentofinformationasregardsthetoxicityoft2andht2toxinforruminants
AT oswaldisabellep assessmentofinformationasregardsthetoxicityoft2andht2toxinforruminants
AT rovestielena assessmentofinformationasregardsthetoxicityoft2andht2toxinforruminants
AT steinkellnerhans assessmentofinformationasregardsthetoxicityoft2andht2toxinforruminants
AT hoogenboomlaurentiusron assessmentofinformationasregardsthetoxicityoft2andht2toxinforruminants