Cargando…

Phenotypic and transcriptomic responses of cultivated sunflower seedlings (Helianthus annuus L.) to four abiotic stresses

Plants encounter and respond to numerous abiotic stresses during their lifetimes. These stresses are often related and could therefore elicit related responses. There are, however, relatively few detailed comparisons between multiple different stresses at the molecular level. Here, we investigated t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barnhart, Max H., Masalia, Rishi R., Mosley, Liana J., Burke, John M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36178944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275462
_version_ 1784800544176472064
author Barnhart, Max H.
Masalia, Rishi R.
Mosley, Liana J.
Burke, John M.
author_facet Barnhart, Max H.
Masalia, Rishi R.
Mosley, Liana J.
Burke, John M.
author_sort Barnhart, Max H.
collection PubMed
description Plants encounter and respond to numerous abiotic stresses during their lifetimes. These stresses are often related and could therefore elicit related responses. There are, however, relatively few detailed comparisons between multiple different stresses at the molecular level. Here, we investigated the phenotypic and transcriptomic response of cultivated sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seedlings to three water-related stresses (i.e., dry-down, an osmotic challenge, and salt stress), as well as a generalized low-nutrient stress. All four stresses negatively impacted seedling growth, with the nutrient stress having a more divergent response from control as compared to the water-related stresses. Phenotypic responses were consistent with expectations for growth in low-resource environments, including increased (i.e., less negative) carbon fractionation values and leaf C:N ratios, as well as increased belowground biomass allocation. The number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) under stress was greater in leaf tissue, but roots exhibited a higher proportion of DEGs unique to individual stresses. Overall, the three water-related stresses had a more similar transcriptomic response to each other vs. nutrient stress, though this pattern was more pronounced in root vs. leaf tissue. In contrast to our DEG analyses, co-expression network analysis revealed that there was little indication of a shared response between the four stresses in despite the majority of DEGs being shared between multiple stresses. Importantly, osmotic stress, which is often used to simulate drought stress in experimental settings, had little transcriptomic resemblance to true water limitation (i.e., dry-down) in our study, calling into question its utility as a means for simulating drought.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9524668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95246682022-10-01 Phenotypic and transcriptomic responses of cultivated sunflower seedlings (Helianthus annuus L.) to four abiotic stresses Barnhart, Max H. Masalia, Rishi R. Mosley, Liana J. Burke, John M. PLoS One Research Article Plants encounter and respond to numerous abiotic stresses during their lifetimes. These stresses are often related and could therefore elicit related responses. There are, however, relatively few detailed comparisons between multiple different stresses at the molecular level. Here, we investigated the phenotypic and transcriptomic response of cultivated sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seedlings to three water-related stresses (i.e., dry-down, an osmotic challenge, and salt stress), as well as a generalized low-nutrient stress. All four stresses negatively impacted seedling growth, with the nutrient stress having a more divergent response from control as compared to the water-related stresses. Phenotypic responses were consistent with expectations for growth in low-resource environments, including increased (i.e., less negative) carbon fractionation values and leaf C:N ratios, as well as increased belowground biomass allocation. The number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) under stress was greater in leaf tissue, but roots exhibited a higher proportion of DEGs unique to individual stresses. Overall, the three water-related stresses had a more similar transcriptomic response to each other vs. nutrient stress, though this pattern was more pronounced in root vs. leaf tissue. In contrast to our DEG analyses, co-expression network analysis revealed that there was little indication of a shared response between the four stresses in despite the majority of DEGs being shared between multiple stresses. Importantly, osmotic stress, which is often used to simulate drought stress in experimental settings, had little transcriptomic resemblance to true water limitation (i.e., dry-down) in our study, calling into question its utility as a means for simulating drought. Public Library of Science 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9524668/ /pubmed/36178944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275462 Text en © 2022 Barnhart et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Barnhart, Max H.
Masalia, Rishi R.
Mosley, Liana J.
Burke, John M.
Phenotypic and transcriptomic responses of cultivated sunflower seedlings (Helianthus annuus L.) to four abiotic stresses
title Phenotypic and transcriptomic responses of cultivated sunflower seedlings (Helianthus annuus L.) to four abiotic stresses
title_full Phenotypic and transcriptomic responses of cultivated sunflower seedlings (Helianthus annuus L.) to four abiotic stresses
title_fullStr Phenotypic and transcriptomic responses of cultivated sunflower seedlings (Helianthus annuus L.) to four abiotic stresses
title_full_unstemmed Phenotypic and transcriptomic responses of cultivated sunflower seedlings (Helianthus annuus L.) to four abiotic stresses
title_short Phenotypic and transcriptomic responses of cultivated sunflower seedlings (Helianthus annuus L.) to four abiotic stresses
title_sort phenotypic and transcriptomic responses of cultivated sunflower seedlings (helianthus annuus l.) to four abiotic stresses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36178944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275462
work_keys_str_mv AT barnhartmaxh phenotypicandtranscriptomicresponsesofcultivatedsunflowerseedlingshelianthusannuusltofourabioticstresses
AT masaliarishir phenotypicandtranscriptomicresponsesofcultivatedsunflowerseedlingshelianthusannuusltofourabioticstresses
AT mosleylianaj phenotypicandtranscriptomicresponsesofcultivatedsunflowerseedlingshelianthusannuusltofourabioticstresses
AT burkejohnm phenotypicandtranscriptomicresponsesofcultivatedsunflowerseedlingshelianthusannuusltofourabioticstresses