Cargando…
Combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach versus long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in infants and small children: A randomized controlled trial
The ultrasound-guided long-axis in-plane approach for central venous catheterization in infants and small children can prevent posterior wall penetration. The combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach reportedly prevents such penetration in adults. To test the hypothesis of no...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36178956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275453 |
_version_ | 1784800548627677184 |
---|---|
author | Takeshita, Jun Nakajima, Yasufumi Tachibana, Kazuya Hamaba, Hirofumi Yamashita, Tomonori Shime, Nobuaki |
author_facet | Takeshita, Jun Nakajima, Yasufumi Tachibana, Kazuya Hamaba, Hirofumi Yamashita, Tomonori Shime, Nobuaki |
author_sort | Takeshita, Jun |
collection | PubMed |
description | The ultrasound-guided long-axis in-plane approach for central venous catheterization in infants and small children can prevent posterior wall penetration. The combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach reportedly prevents such penetration in adults. To test the hypothesis of non-inferiority of the combined approach to the long-axis in-plane approach, we compared the two approaches in infants and small children. Patients were randomized based on whether they underwent ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein catheterization using the combined or long-axis in-plane approach. Posterior wall penetration rates, first-attempt success rates, overall success rates within 20 min; scanning, puncture, and procedure durations; and number of attempts were compared between the groups. In the combined and long-axis in-plane groups (n = 55 per group), the posterior wall penetration rates were 5.5% (3/55) and 3.6% (2/55) (P = 0.65), the first-attempt success rates were 94.5% (52/55) and 92.7% (51/55) (P = 0.70), and the overall success rates within 20 min were 100% (55/55) and 98.2% (54/55) (P = 0.32), respectively. In the combined and long-axis in-plane groups, the median (interquartile range) scanning durations were 21 (16.5–34.8) s and 47 (29.3–65) s (P<0.0001), the puncture durations were 114 (83–170) s and 74 (52.3–117.3) s (P = 0.0002), and the procedure durations were 141 (99–97.8) s and 118 (88.5–195.5) s (P = 0.14), respectively. The median number of attempts was 1 (interquartile range: 1–1, range: 1–3) in both groups (P = 0.72). Similar to the long-axis in-plane approach, the combined approach for internal jugular vein catheterization prevented posterior wall penetration in infants and small children. Trial registration: This trial was registered before patient enrollment in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, registration number UMIN000039387 (https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/ctr/ctr_view_reg.cgi?recptno=R000044907). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9524688 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95246882022-10-01 Combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach versus long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in infants and small children: A randomized controlled trial Takeshita, Jun Nakajima, Yasufumi Tachibana, Kazuya Hamaba, Hirofumi Yamashita, Tomonori Shime, Nobuaki PLoS One Research Article The ultrasound-guided long-axis in-plane approach for central venous catheterization in infants and small children can prevent posterior wall penetration. The combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach reportedly prevents such penetration in adults. To test the hypothesis of non-inferiority of the combined approach to the long-axis in-plane approach, we compared the two approaches in infants and small children. Patients were randomized based on whether they underwent ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein catheterization using the combined or long-axis in-plane approach. Posterior wall penetration rates, first-attempt success rates, overall success rates within 20 min; scanning, puncture, and procedure durations; and number of attempts were compared between the groups. In the combined and long-axis in-plane groups (n = 55 per group), the posterior wall penetration rates were 5.5% (3/55) and 3.6% (2/55) (P = 0.65), the first-attempt success rates were 94.5% (52/55) and 92.7% (51/55) (P = 0.70), and the overall success rates within 20 min were 100% (55/55) and 98.2% (54/55) (P = 0.32), respectively. In the combined and long-axis in-plane groups, the median (interquartile range) scanning durations were 21 (16.5–34.8) s and 47 (29.3–65) s (P<0.0001), the puncture durations were 114 (83–170) s and 74 (52.3–117.3) s (P = 0.0002), and the procedure durations were 141 (99–97.8) s and 118 (88.5–195.5) s (P = 0.14), respectively. The median number of attempts was 1 (interquartile range: 1–1, range: 1–3) in both groups (P = 0.72). Similar to the long-axis in-plane approach, the combined approach for internal jugular vein catheterization prevented posterior wall penetration in infants and small children. Trial registration: This trial was registered before patient enrollment in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, registration number UMIN000039387 (https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/ctr/ctr_view_reg.cgi?recptno=R000044907). Public Library of Science 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9524688/ /pubmed/36178956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275453 Text en © 2022 Takeshita et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Takeshita, Jun Nakajima, Yasufumi Tachibana, Kazuya Hamaba, Hirofumi Yamashita, Tomonori Shime, Nobuaki Combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach versus long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in infants and small children: A randomized controlled trial |
title | Combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach versus long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in infants and small children: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach versus long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in infants and small children: A randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach versus long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in infants and small children: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach versus long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in infants and small children: A randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach versus long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in infants and small children: A randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach versus long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in infants and small children: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36178956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275453 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT takeshitajun combinedshortaxisoutofplaneandlongaxisinplaneapproachversuslongaxisinplaneapproachforultrasoundguidedcentralvenouscatheterizationininfantsandsmallchildrenarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT nakajimayasufumi combinedshortaxisoutofplaneandlongaxisinplaneapproachversuslongaxisinplaneapproachforultrasoundguidedcentralvenouscatheterizationininfantsandsmallchildrenarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tachibanakazuya combinedshortaxisoutofplaneandlongaxisinplaneapproachversuslongaxisinplaneapproachforultrasoundguidedcentralvenouscatheterizationininfantsandsmallchildrenarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hamabahirofumi combinedshortaxisoutofplaneandlongaxisinplaneapproachversuslongaxisinplaneapproachforultrasoundguidedcentralvenouscatheterizationininfantsandsmallchildrenarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yamashitatomonori combinedshortaxisoutofplaneandlongaxisinplaneapproachversuslongaxisinplaneapproachforultrasoundguidedcentralvenouscatheterizationininfantsandsmallchildrenarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT shimenobuaki combinedshortaxisoutofplaneandlongaxisinplaneapproachversuslongaxisinplaneapproachforultrasoundguidedcentralvenouscatheterizationininfantsandsmallchildrenarandomizedcontrolledtrial |