Cargando…

Combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach versus long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in infants and small children: A randomized controlled trial

The ultrasound-guided long-axis in-plane approach for central venous catheterization in infants and small children can prevent posterior wall penetration. The combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach reportedly prevents such penetration in adults. To test the hypothesis of no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takeshita, Jun, Nakajima, Yasufumi, Tachibana, Kazuya, Hamaba, Hirofumi, Yamashita, Tomonori, Shime, Nobuaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36178956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275453
_version_ 1784800548627677184
author Takeshita, Jun
Nakajima, Yasufumi
Tachibana, Kazuya
Hamaba, Hirofumi
Yamashita, Tomonori
Shime, Nobuaki
author_facet Takeshita, Jun
Nakajima, Yasufumi
Tachibana, Kazuya
Hamaba, Hirofumi
Yamashita, Tomonori
Shime, Nobuaki
author_sort Takeshita, Jun
collection PubMed
description The ultrasound-guided long-axis in-plane approach for central venous catheterization in infants and small children can prevent posterior wall penetration. The combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach reportedly prevents such penetration in adults. To test the hypothesis of non-inferiority of the combined approach to the long-axis in-plane approach, we compared the two approaches in infants and small children. Patients were randomized based on whether they underwent ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein catheterization using the combined or long-axis in-plane approach. Posterior wall penetration rates, first-attempt success rates, overall success rates within 20 min; scanning, puncture, and procedure durations; and number of attempts were compared between the groups. In the combined and long-axis in-plane groups (n = 55 per group), the posterior wall penetration rates were 5.5% (3/55) and 3.6% (2/55) (P = 0.65), the first-attempt success rates were 94.5% (52/55) and 92.7% (51/55) (P = 0.70), and the overall success rates within 20 min were 100% (55/55) and 98.2% (54/55) (P = 0.32), respectively. In the combined and long-axis in-plane groups, the median (interquartile range) scanning durations were 21 (16.5–34.8) s and 47 (29.3–65) s (P<0.0001), the puncture durations were 114 (83–170) s and 74 (52.3–117.3) s (P = 0.0002), and the procedure durations were 141 (99–97.8) s and 118 (88.5–195.5) s (P = 0.14), respectively. The median number of attempts was 1 (interquartile range: 1–1, range: 1–3) in both groups (P = 0.72). Similar to the long-axis in-plane approach, the combined approach for internal jugular vein catheterization prevented posterior wall penetration in infants and small children. Trial registration: This trial was registered before patient enrollment in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, registration number UMIN000039387 (https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/ctr/ctr_view_reg.cgi?recptno=R000044907).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9524688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95246882022-10-01 Combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach versus long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in infants and small children: A randomized controlled trial Takeshita, Jun Nakajima, Yasufumi Tachibana, Kazuya Hamaba, Hirofumi Yamashita, Tomonori Shime, Nobuaki PLoS One Research Article The ultrasound-guided long-axis in-plane approach for central venous catheterization in infants and small children can prevent posterior wall penetration. The combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach reportedly prevents such penetration in adults. To test the hypothesis of non-inferiority of the combined approach to the long-axis in-plane approach, we compared the two approaches in infants and small children. Patients were randomized based on whether they underwent ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein catheterization using the combined or long-axis in-plane approach. Posterior wall penetration rates, first-attempt success rates, overall success rates within 20 min; scanning, puncture, and procedure durations; and number of attempts were compared between the groups. In the combined and long-axis in-plane groups (n = 55 per group), the posterior wall penetration rates were 5.5% (3/55) and 3.6% (2/55) (P = 0.65), the first-attempt success rates were 94.5% (52/55) and 92.7% (51/55) (P = 0.70), and the overall success rates within 20 min were 100% (55/55) and 98.2% (54/55) (P = 0.32), respectively. In the combined and long-axis in-plane groups, the median (interquartile range) scanning durations were 21 (16.5–34.8) s and 47 (29.3–65) s (P<0.0001), the puncture durations were 114 (83–170) s and 74 (52.3–117.3) s (P = 0.0002), and the procedure durations were 141 (99–97.8) s and 118 (88.5–195.5) s (P = 0.14), respectively. The median number of attempts was 1 (interquartile range: 1–1, range: 1–3) in both groups (P = 0.72). Similar to the long-axis in-plane approach, the combined approach for internal jugular vein catheterization prevented posterior wall penetration in infants and small children. Trial registration: This trial was registered before patient enrollment in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, registration number UMIN000039387 (https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/ctr/ctr_view_reg.cgi?recptno=R000044907). Public Library of Science 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9524688/ /pubmed/36178956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275453 Text en © 2022 Takeshita et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Takeshita, Jun
Nakajima, Yasufumi
Tachibana, Kazuya
Hamaba, Hirofumi
Yamashita, Tomonori
Shime, Nobuaki
Combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach versus long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in infants and small children: A randomized controlled trial
title Combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach versus long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in infants and small children: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach versus long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in infants and small children: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach versus long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in infants and small children: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach versus long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in infants and small children: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach versus long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in infants and small children: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach versus long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in infants and small children: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36178956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275453
work_keys_str_mv AT takeshitajun combinedshortaxisoutofplaneandlongaxisinplaneapproachversuslongaxisinplaneapproachforultrasoundguidedcentralvenouscatheterizationininfantsandsmallchildrenarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nakajimayasufumi combinedshortaxisoutofplaneandlongaxisinplaneapproachversuslongaxisinplaneapproachforultrasoundguidedcentralvenouscatheterizationininfantsandsmallchildrenarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tachibanakazuya combinedshortaxisoutofplaneandlongaxisinplaneapproachversuslongaxisinplaneapproachforultrasoundguidedcentralvenouscatheterizationininfantsandsmallchildrenarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hamabahirofumi combinedshortaxisoutofplaneandlongaxisinplaneapproachversuslongaxisinplaneapproachforultrasoundguidedcentralvenouscatheterizationininfantsandsmallchildrenarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yamashitatomonori combinedshortaxisoutofplaneandlongaxisinplaneapproachversuslongaxisinplaneapproachforultrasoundguidedcentralvenouscatheterizationininfantsandsmallchildrenarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shimenobuaki combinedshortaxisoutofplaneandlongaxisinplaneapproachversuslongaxisinplaneapproachforultrasoundguidedcentralvenouscatheterizationininfantsandsmallchildrenarandomizedcontrolledtrial