Cargando…

Comparison of methods for evaluation of upper esophageal sphincter (UES) relaxation duration: Videofluoroscopic swallow study versus high-resolution manometry

This study aims to compare the 2 methods of upper esophageal sphincter (UES) relaxation measurement and determine which method has better diagnostic value in UES relaxation impairment The study included 140 patients with pharyngeal dysphagia who underwent both videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Chul-Hyun, Kim, Kunwoo, Hwang, Jin-Tae, Choi, Jae-Hyung, Lee, Yong-Taek, Park, Young Sook, Park, Jung Ho, Yoon, Kyung Jae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36181078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030771
_version_ 1784800593459544064
author Park, Chul-Hyun
Kim, Kunwoo
Hwang, Jin-Tae
Choi, Jae-Hyung
Lee, Yong-Taek
Park, Young Sook
Park, Jung Ho
Yoon, Kyung Jae
author_facet Park, Chul-Hyun
Kim, Kunwoo
Hwang, Jin-Tae
Choi, Jae-Hyung
Lee, Yong-Taek
Park, Young Sook
Park, Jung Ho
Yoon, Kyung Jae
author_sort Park, Chul-Hyun
collection PubMed
description This study aims to compare the 2 methods of upper esophageal sphincter (UES) relaxation measurement and determine which method has better diagnostic value in UES relaxation impairment The study included 140 patients with pharyngeal dysphagia who underwent both videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) and high-resolution manometry (HRM). Feeding method was determined to oral or non-oral feeding based on the severity of dysphagia; 103 patients were in oral feeding group and 37 were in non-oral feeding group. UES relaxation duration was measured using VFSS and HRM, respectively. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to validate the UES relaxation duration in determination of feeding method. UES relaxation duration was more decreased in non-oral feeding group than in oral feeding group on both VFSS and HRM. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis revealed that the optimal cutoff value of UES relaxation duration to determine feeding method (oral or non-oral feeding) was 0.42 seconds on VFSS and 0.44 seconds on HRM. The sensitivity for feeding method was higher in VFSS than HRM (83.5% vs 70.9%), while the specificity was higher in HRM than VFSS (48.6% vs 54.1%). VFSS and HRM have complementary ability in evaluating UES relaxation duration in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9524913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95249132022-10-03 Comparison of methods for evaluation of upper esophageal sphincter (UES) relaxation duration: Videofluoroscopic swallow study versus high-resolution manometry Park, Chul-Hyun Kim, Kunwoo Hwang, Jin-Tae Choi, Jae-Hyung Lee, Yong-Taek Park, Young Sook Park, Jung Ho Yoon, Kyung Jae Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article This study aims to compare the 2 methods of upper esophageal sphincter (UES) relaxation measurement and determine which method has better diagnostic value in UES relaxation impairment The study included 140 patients with pharyngeal dysphagia who underwent both videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) and high-resolution manometry (HRM). Feeding method was determined to oral or non-oral feeding based on the severity of dysphagia; 103 patients were in oral feeding group and 37 were in non-oral feeding group. UES relaxation duration was measured using VFSS and HRM, respectively. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to validate the UES relaxation duration in determination of feeding method. UES relaxation duration was more decreased in non-oral feeding group than in oral feeding group on both VFSS and HRM. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis revealed that the optimal cutoff value of UES relaxation duration to determine feeding method (oral or non-oral feeding) was 0.42 seconds on VFSS and 0.44 seconds on HRM. The sensitivity for feeding method was higher in VFSS than HRM (83.5% vs 70.9%), while the specificity was higher in HRM than VFSS (48.6% vs 54.1%). VFSS and HRM have complementary ability in evaluating UES relaxation duration in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9524913/ /pubmed/36181078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030771 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Research Article
Park, Chul-Hyun
Kim, Kunwoo
Hwang, Jin-Tae
Choi, Jae-Hyung
Lee, Yong-Taek
Park, Young Sook
Park, Jung Ho
Yoon, Kyung Jae
Comparison of methods for evaluation of upper esophageal sphincter (UES) relaxation duration: Videofluoroscopic swallow study versus high-resolution manometry
title Comparison of methods for evaluation of upper esophageal sphincter (UES) relaxation duration: Videofluoroscopic swallow study versus high-resolution manometry
title_full Comparison of methods for evaluation of upper esophageal sphincter (UES) relaxation duration: Videofluoroscopic swallow study versus high-resolution manometry
title_fullStr Comparison of methods for evaluation of upper esophageal sphincter (UES) relaxation duration: Videofluoroscopic swallow study versus high-resolution manometry
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of methods for evaluation of upper esophageal sphincter (UES) relaxation duration: Videofluoroscopic swallow study versus high-resolution manometry
title_short Comparison of methods for evaluation of upper esophageal sphincter (UES) relaxation duration: Videofluoroscopic swallow study versus high-resolution manometry
title_sort comparison of methods for evaluation of upper esophageal sphincter (ues) relaxation duration: videofluoroscopic swallow study versus high-resolution manometry
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36181078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030771
work_keys_str_mv AT parkchulhyun comparisonofmethodsforevaluationofupperesophagealsphincteruesrelaxationdurationvideofluoroscopicswallowstudyversushighresolutionmanometry
AT kimkunwoo comparisonofmethodsforevaluationofupperesophagealsphincteruesrelaxationdurationvideofluoroscopicswallowstudyversushighresolutionmanometry
AT hwangjintae comparisonofmethodsforevaluationofupperesophagealsphincteruesrelaxationdurationvideofluoroscopicswallowstudyversushighresolutionmanometry
AT choijaehyung comparisonofmethodsforevaluationofupperesophagealsphincteruesrelaxationdurationvideofluoroscopicswallowstudyversushighresolutionmanometry
AT leeyongtaek comparisonofmethodsforevaluationofupperesophagealsphincteruesrelaxationdurationvideofluoroscopicswallowstudyversushighresolutionmanometry
AT parkyoungsook comparisonofmethodsforevaluationofupperesophagealsphincteruesrelaxationdurationvideofluoroscopicswallowstudyversushighresolutionmanometry
AT parkjungho comparisonofmethodsforevaluationofupperesophagealsphincteruesrelaxationdurationvideofluoroscopicswallowstudyversushighresolutionmanometry
AT yoonkyungjae comparisonofmethodsforevaluationofupperesophagealsphincteruesrelaxationdurationvideofluoroscopicswallowstudyversushighresolutionmanometry