Cargando…
The efficacy of mindfulness-based intervention for heart diseases: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
The efficacy of mindfulness-based intervention for heart diseases remains controversial. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the impact of mindfulness-based intervention on heart diseases. METHODS: We have search PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library dat...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36181030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029649 |
Sumario: | The efficacy of mindfulness-based intervention for heart diseases remains controversial. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the impact of mindfulness-based intervention on heart diseases. METHODS: We have search PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through August 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of mindfulness-based intervention versus usual care on heart diseases. This meta-analysis is performed using the random-effect model. RESULTS: Five RCTs involving 458 patients are included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control group for heart diseases, mindfulness-based intervention is associated with significantly increased 6 minute walking test [mean difference (MD) = 14.74; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 2.50–26.97; P = .02], decreased heart rate (MD = −2.54; 95% CI = −4.76 to −0.31; P = .03) and stress score (MD = −2.31; 95% CI = −4.23 to −0.38; P = .02), but shows no obvious impact on anxiety score (MD = −3.48; 95% CI = −7.98 to 1.03; P = .13) or respiratory rate (MD = −0.42; 95% CI = −1.31 to 0.46; P = .35). CONCLUSIONS: Mindfulness-based intervention can provide additional benefits to heart diseases. |
---|