Cargando…

Evaluation of right ventricular function in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension by different right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling methods

To compare the accuracy of end-systolic elasticity (E(es))/arterial elasticity (E(a)) ratio measured by single beat estimation, pressure–volume loop and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) combined volume method in patients with pulmonary artery hypertension, and to find a feasible and reliable method...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dong, Yaling, Li, Yu, Song, Laichun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36181031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030873
_version_ 1784800611477225472
author Dong, Yaling
Li, Yu
Song, Laichun
author_facet Dong, Yaling
Li, Yu
Song, Laichun
author_sort Dong, Yaling
collection PubMed
description To compare the accuracy of end-systolic elasticity (E(es))/arterial elasticity (E(a)) ratio measured by single beat estimation, pressure–volume loop and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) combined volume method in patients with pulmonary artery hypertension, and to find a feasible and reliable method to quantitatively evaluate the function of right ventricle in patients with pulmonary artery hypertension. Forty-nine pulmonary artery hypertension patients enrolled between May 2017 and May 2018 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Firstly, measure E(es)/E(a) ratio by single beat estimation, pressure–volume loop and CMR combined volume method, then, compare E(es)/E(a) ratio with New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification and NT-proBNP value respectively to evaluate the accuracy of the 3 methods. E(es)/E(a) ratio measured by single beat estimation is 2.07 ± 1.01, correlation analysis is not statistically significant when compare with NYHA classification and NT-proBNP value (P > .05). E(es)/E(a) ratio measured by pressure–volume loop is 2.64 ± 1.48, correlation analysis is not statistically significant when compare with NYHA classification and NT-proBNP value (P > .05). E(es)/E(a) ratio measured by CMR combined volume method is 0.72 ± 0.43, correlation analysis is statistically significant when compare with NYHA classification and NT-proBNP with negative correlation (P < .05). E(es)/E(a) ratio decrease according to the increase of NT-proBNP value and the NYHA classification. There is linear regression equation between E(es)/E(a) ratio measured by CMR combined volume method and log (NT-proBNP) value: Y = –0.257X + 1.45, and the linear regression equation is statistically significant (P = .001). E(es)/E(a) ratio measured by CMR combined volume method is a feasible and reliable method to quantitatively evaluate the function of right ventricule in patients with pulmonary artery hypertension, which might be further verified in a larger patient population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9524992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95249922022-10-03 Evaluation of right ventricular function in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension by different right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling methods Dong, Yaling Li, Yu Song, Laichun Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article To compare the accuracy of end-systolic elasticity (E(es))/arterial elasticity (E(a)) ratio measured by single beat estimation, pressure–volume loop and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) combined volume method in patients with pulmonary artery hypertension, and to find a feasible and reliable method to quantitatively evaluate the function of right ventricle in patients with pulmonary artery hypertension. Forty-nine pulmonary artery hypertension patients enrolled between May 2017 and May 2018 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Firstly, measure E(es)/E(a) ratio by single beat estimation, pressure–volume loop and CMR combined volume method, then, compare E(es)/E(a) ratio with New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification and NT-proBNP value respectively to evaluate the accuracy of the 3 methods. E(es)/E(a) ratio measured by single beat estimation is 2.07 ± 1.01, correlation analysis is not statistically significant when compare with NYHA classification and NT-proBNP value (P > .05). E(es)/E(a) ratio measured by pressure–volume loop is 2.64 ± 1.48, correlation analysis is not statistically significant when compare with NYHA classification and NT-proBNP value (P > .05). E(es)/E(a) ratio measured by CMR combined volume method is 0.72 ± 0.43, correlation analysis is statistically significant when compare with NYHA classification and NT-proBNP with negative correlation (P < .05). E(es)/E(a) ratio decrease according to the increase of NT-proBNP value and the NYHA classification. There is linear regression equation between E(es)/E(a) ratio measured by CMR combined volume method and log (NT-proBNP) value: Y = –0.257X + 1.45, and the linear regression equation is statistically significant (P = .001). E(es)/E(a) ratio measured by CMR combined volume method is a feasible and reliable method to quantitatively evaluate the function of right ventricule in patients with pulmonary artery hypertension, which might be further verified in a larger patient population. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9524992/ /pubmed/36181031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030873 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dong, Yaling
Li, Yu
Song, Laichun
Evaluation of right ventricular function in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension by different right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling methods
title Evaluation of right ventricular function in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension by different right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling methods
title_full Evaluation of right ventricular function in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension by different right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling methods
title_fullStr Evaluation of right ventricular function in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension by different right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling methods
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of right ventricular function in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension by different right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling methods
title_short Evaluation of right ventricular function in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension by different right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling methods
title_sort evaluation of right ventricular function in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension by different right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36181031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030873
work_keys_str_mv AT dongyaling evaluationofrightventricularfunctioninpatientswithpulmonaryarterialhypertensionbydifferentrightventricularpulmonaryarterycouplingmethods
AT liyu evaluationofrightventricularfunctioninpatientswithpulmonaryarterialhypertensionbydifferentrightventricularpulmonaryarterycouplingmethods
AT songlaichun evaluationofrightventricularfunctioninpatientswithpulmonaryarterialhypertensionbydifferentrightventricularpulmonaryarterycouplingmethods