Cargando…

Impact of feminizing hormone therapy on tenofovir and emtricitabine plasma pharmacokinetics: a nested drug–drug interaction study in a cohort of Brazilian transgender women using HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis

OBJECTIVES: Potential interactions between feminizing hormone therapy (FHT) and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) may be a barrier to PrEP use among transgender women (TGW). We aimed to assess the impact of FHT on PrEP plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) among TGW. METHODS: This was a PK substudy of the effe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cattani, Vitória Berg, Jalil, Emilia Moreira, Eksterman, Leonardo, Torres, Thiago, Cardoso, Sandra Wagner, Castro, Cristiane R V, Monteiro, Laylla, Wilson, Erin, Bushman, Lane, Anderson, Peter, Veloso, Valdilea Gonçalves, Grinsztejn, Beatriz, Estrela, Rita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9525093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35815666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkac229
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Potential interactions between feminizing hormone therapy (FHT) and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) may be a barrier to PrEP use among transgender women (TGW). We aimed to assess the impact of FHT on PrEP plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) among TGW. METHODS: This was a PK substudy of the effects of FHT on tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine nested to a trans-specific PrEP demonstration study (NCT03220152). Participants were assigned to receive PrEP only (noFHT) or standardized FHT (sFHT; oestradiol valerate 2–6 mg plus spironolactone 100–300 mg) plus PrEP for 12 weeks, after which they could start any FHT (aFHT). Short- and long-term PK assessment occurred at Weeks 12 and 30–48, respectively (plasma samples prior and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 h after dose). Non-compartmental PK parameters of tenofovir and emtricitabine were compared as geometric mean ratios (GMRs) between noFHT and PrEP and FHT (sFHT at short-term PK; aFHT at long-term PK) participants. RESULTS: No differences in tenofovir and emtricitabine plasma PK parameters were observed between the short-term PK of noFHT (n = 12) and sFHT participants (n = 18), except for emtricitabine C(max) [GMR: 1.15 (95% CI: 1.01–1.32)], or between noFHT short-term PK and aFHT long-term PK (n = 13). Most participants were on oestradiol valerate 2 mg at the short-term PK (56%) and 4 mg at the long-term PK (54%). Median (IQR) oestradiol levels were 56.8 (43.2–65.4) pg/mL at short-term PK (sFHT) and 44.8 (24.70–57.30) pg/mL at long-term PK (aFHT). No participants in this analysis seroconverted during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate no interaction of FHT on tenofovir levels, further supporting PrEP use among TGW using FHT.