Cargando…

The Impact of Field Courses on Undergraduate Knowledge, Affect, Behavior, and Skills: A Scoping Review

Field courses provide transformative learning experiences that support success and improve persistence for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics majors. But field courses have not increased proportionally with the number of students in the natural sciences. We conducted a scoping review...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shinbrot, Xoco A, Treibergs, Kira, Hernández, Lina M Arcila, Esparza, David, Ghezzi-Kopel, Kate, Goebel, Marc, Graham, Olivia J, Heim, Ashley B, Smith, Jansen A, Smith, Michelle K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9525126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36196223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac070
_version_ 1784800641670971392
author Shinbrot, Xoco A
Treibergs, Kira
Hernández, Lina M Arcila
Esparza, David
Ghezzi-Kopel, Kate
Goebel, Marc
Graham, Olivia J
Heim, Ashley B
Smith, Jansen A
Smith, Michelle K
author_facet Shinbrot, Xoco A
Treibergs, Kira
Hernández, Lina M Arcila
Esparza, David
Ghezzi-Kopel, Kate
Goebel, Marc
Graham, Olivia J
Heim, Ashley B
Smith, Jansen A
Smith, Michelle K
author_sort Shinbrot, Xoco A
collection PubMed
description Field courses provide transformative learning experiences that support success and improve persistence for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics majors. But field courses have not increased proportionally with the number of students in the natural sciences. We conducted a scoping review to investigate the factors influencing undergraduate participation in and the outcomes from field courses in the United States. Our search yielded 61 articles, from which we classified the knowledge, affect, behavior, and skill-based outcomes resulting from field course participation. We found consistent reporting on course design but little reporting on demographics, which limits our understanding of who takes field courses. Cost was the most commonly reported barrier to student participation, and knowledge gains were the most commonly reported outcome. This scoping review underscores the need for more rigorous and evidence-based investigations of student outcomes in field courses. Understanding how field courses support or hinder student engagement is necessary to make them more accessible to all students.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9525126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95251262022-10-03 The Impact of Field Courses on Undergraduate Knowledge, Affect, Behavior, and Skills: A Scoping Review Shinbrot, Xoco A Treibergs, Kira Hernández, Lina M Arcila Esparza, David Ghezzi-Kopel, Kate Goebel, Marc Graham, Olivia J Heim, Ashley B Smith, Jansen A Smith, Michelle K Bioscience Education Field courses provide transformative learning experiences that support success and improve persistence for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics majors. But field courses have not increased proportionally with the number of students in the natural sciences. We conducted a scoping review to investigate the factors influencing undergraduate participation in and the outcomes from field courses in the United States. Our search yielded 61 articles, from which we classified the knowledge, affect, behavior, and skill-based outcomes resulting from field course participation. We found consistent reporting on course design but little reporting on demographics, which limits our understanding of who takes field courses. Cost was the most commonly reported barrier to student participation, and knowledge gains were the most commonly reported outcome. This scoping review underscores the need for more rigorous and evidence-based investigations of student outcomes in field courses. Understanding how field courses support or hinder student engagement is necessary to make them more accessible to all students. Oxford University Press 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9525126/ /pubmed/36196223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac070 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Institute of Biological Sciences. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Education
Shinbrot, Xoco A
Treibergs, Kira
Hernández, Lina M Arcila
Esparza, David
Ghezzi-Kopel, Kate
Goebel, Marc
Graham, Olivia J
Heim, Ashley B
Smith, Jansen A
Smith, Michelle K
The Impact of Field Courses on Undergraduate Knowledge, Affect, Behavior, and Skills: A Scoping Review
title The Impact of Field Courses on Undergraduate Knowledge, Affect, Behavior, and Skills: A Scoping Review
title_full The Impact of Field Courses on Undergraduate Knowledge, Affect, Behavior, and Skills: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr The Impact of Field Courses on Undergraduate Knowledge, Affect, Behavior, and Skills: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Field Courses on Undergraduate Knowledge, Affect, Behavior, and Skills: A Scoping Review
title_short The Impact of Field Courses on Undergraduate Knowledge, Affect, Behavior, and Skills: A Scoping Review
title_sort impact of field courses on undergraduate knowledge, affect, behavior, and skills: a scoping review
topic Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9525126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36196223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac070
work_keys_str_mv AT shinbrotxocoa theimpactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview
AT treibergskira theimpactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview
AT hernandezlinamarcila theimpactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview
AT esparzadavid theimpactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview
AT ghezzikopelkate theimpactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview
AT goebelmarc theimpactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview
AT grahamoliviaj theimpactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview
AT heimashleyb theimpactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview
AT smithjansena theimpactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview
AT smithmichellek theimpactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview
AT shinbrotxocoa impactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview
AT treibergskira impactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview
AT hernandezlinamarcila impactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview
AT esparzadavid impactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview
AT ghezzikopelkate impactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview
AT goebelmarc impactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview
AT grahamoliviaj impactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview
AT heimashleyb impactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview
AT smithjansena impactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview
AT smithmichellek impactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview