Cargando…
The Impact of Field Courses on Undergraduate Knowledge, Affect, Behavior, and Skills: A Scoping Review
Field courses provide transformative learning experiences that support success and improve persistence for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics majors. But field courses have not increased proportionally with the number of students in the natural sciences. We conducted a scoping review...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9525126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36196223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac070 |
_version_ | 1784800641670971392 |
---|---|
author | Shinbrot, Xoco A Treibergs, Kira Hernández, Lina M Arcila Esparza, David Ghezzi-Kopel, Kate Goebel, Marc Graham, Olivia J Heim, Ashley B Smith, Jansen A Smith, Michelle K |
author_facet | Shinbrot, Xoco A Treibergs, Kira Hernández, Lina M Arcila Esparza, David Ghezzi-Kopel, Kate Goebel, Marc Graham, Olivia J Heim, Ashley B Smith, Jansen A Smith, Michelle K |
author_sort | Shinbrot, Xoco A |
collection | PubMed |
description | Field courses provide transformative learning experiences that support success and improve persistence for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics majors. But field courses have not increased proportionally with the number of students in the natural sciences. We conducted a scoping review to investigate the factors influencing undergraduate participation in and the outcomes from field courses in the United States. Our search yielded 61 articles, from which we classified the knowledge, affect, behavior, and skill-based outcomes resulting from field course participation. We found consistent reporting on course design but little reporting on demographics, which limits our understanding of who takes field courses. Cost was the most commonly reported barrier to student participation, and knowledge gains were the most commonly reported outcome. This scoping review underscores the need for more rigorous and evidence-based investigations of student outcomes in field courses. Understanding how field courses support or hinder student engagement is necessary to make them more accessible to all students. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9525126 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95251262022-10-03 The Impact of Field Courses on Undergraduate Knowledge, Affect, Behavior, and Skills: A Scoping Review Shinbrot, Xoco A Treibergs, Kira Hernández, Lina M Arcila Esparza, David Ghezzi-Kopel, Kate Goebel, Marc Graham, Olivia J Heim, Ashley B Smith, Jansen A Smith, Michelle K Bioscience Education Field courses provide transformative learning experiences that support success and improve persistence for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics majors. But field courses have not increased proportionally with the number of students in the natural sciences. We conducted a scoping review to investigate the factors influencing undergraduate participation in and the outcomes from field courses in the United States. Our search yielded 61 articles, from which we classified the knowledge, affect, behavior, and skill-based outcomes resulting from field course participation. We found consistent reporting on course design but little reporting on demographics, which limits our understanding of who takes field courses. Cost was the most commonly reported barrier to student participation, and knowledge gains were the most commonly reported outcome. This scoping review underscores the need for more rigorous and evidence-based investigations of student outcomes in field courses. Understanding how field courses support or hinder student engagement is necessary to make them more accessible to all students. Oxford University Press 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9525126/ /pubmed/36196223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac070 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Institute of Biological Sciences. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Education Shinbrot, Xoco A Treibergs, Kira Hernández, Lina M Arcila Esparza, David Ghezzi-Kopel, Kate Goebel, Marc Graham, Olivia J Heim, Ashley B Smith, Jansen A Smith, Michelle K The Impact of Field Courses on Undergraduate Knowledge, Affect, Behavior, and Skills: A Scoping Review |
title | The Impact of Field Courses on Undergraduate Knowledge, Affect, Behavior, and Skills: A Scoping Review |
title_full | The Impact of Field Courses on Undergraduate Knowledge, Affect, Behavior, and Skills: A Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | The Impact of Field Courses on Undergraduate Knowledge, Affect, Behavior, and Skills: A Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Field Courses on Undergraduate Knowledge, Affect, Behavior, and Skills: A Scoping Review |
title_short | The Impact of Field Courses on Undergraduate Knowledge, Affect, Behavior, and Skills: A Scoping Review |
title_sort | impact of field courses on undergraduate knowledge, affect, behavior, and skills: a scoping review |
topic | Education |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9525126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36196223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac070 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shinbrotxocoa theimpactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview AT treibergskira theimpactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview AT hernandezlinamarcila theimpactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview AT esparzadavid theimpactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview AT ghezzikopelkate theimpactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview AT goebelmarc theimpactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview AT grahamoliviaj theimpactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview AT heimashleyb theimpactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview AT smithjansena theimpactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview AT smithmichellek theimpactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview AT shinbrotxocoa impactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview AT treibergskira impactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview AT hernandezlinamarcila impactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview AT esparzadavid impactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview AT ghezzikopelkate impactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview AT goebelmarc impactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview AT grahamoliviaj impactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview AT heimashleyb impactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview AT smithjansena impactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview AT smithmichellek impactoffieldcoursesonundergraduateknowledgeaffectbehaviorandskillsascopingreview |