Cargando…

First Trimester Screening – Current Status and Future Prospects After Introduction of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) at a Tertiary Referral Center

Objective To investigate the uptake of different components of first trimester screening (FTS) and the impact on invasive diagnostic testing (IPT) since the introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) at a level III center. Methods Retrospective data analysis was conducted for singleton pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walter, Adeline, Simonini, Corinna, Gembruch, Ulrich, Flöck, Anne, Strizek, Brigitte, Geipel, Annegret
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9525146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36186146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1787-8803
_version_ 1784800646516441088
author Walter, Adeline
Simonini, Corinna
Gembruch, Ulrich
Flöck, Anne
Strizek, Brigitte
Geipel, Annegret
author_facet Walter, Adeline
Simonini, Corinna
Gembruch, Ulrich
Flöck, Anne
Strizek, Brigitte
Geipel, Annegret
author_sort Walter, Adeline
collection PubMed
description Objective To investigate the uptake of different components of first trimester screening (FTS) and the impact on invasive diagnostic testing (IPT) since the introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) at a level III center. Methods Retrospective data analysis was conducted for singleton pregnancies that presented for FTS between 01/2019–12/2019 (group 1, n = 990). Patients were categorized into three risk groups: low risk for trisomy 21 (< 1 : 1000), intermediate risk (1 : 101–1 : 1000) and high risk (≥ 1 : 100). Uptake of NIPT and IPT was analyzed for each of the risk groups. Results were compared to a previous cohort from 2012/2013 (immediately after the introduction of NIPT, group 2, n = 1178). Results Group 1 showed a significant increase in the use of NIPT as part of FTS (29.5% vs. 3.7% for group 2, p = 0.001) in all three risk groups. Overall IPT rates were lower in group 1 (8.6%) vs. group 2 (11.3%, p = 0.038), mainly due to a significant reduction of IPT in the intermediate risk group. IPT rates in the high-risk group remained stable over time. Conclusion Appropriate clinical implementation of NIPT is still currently a challenge for prenatal medicine experts. Our data suggest that widespread uptake of NIPT is becoming more common these days; however, a contingent approach might prevent redundant uptake.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9525146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95251462022-10-01 First Trimester Screening – Current Status and Future Prospects After Introduction of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) at a Tertiary Referral Center Walter, Adeline Simonini, Corinna Gembruch, Ulrich Flöck, Anne Strizek, Brigitte Geipel, Annegret Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Objective To investigate the uptake of different components of first trimester screening (FTS) and the impact on invasive diagnostic testing (IPT) since the introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) at a level III center. Methods Retrospective data analysis was conducted for singleton pregnancies that presented for FTS between 01/2019–12/2019 (group 1, n = 990). Patients were categorized into three risk groups: low risk for trisomy 21 (< 1 : 1000), intermediate risk (1 : 101–1 : 1000) and high risk (≥ 1 : 100). Uptake of NIPT and IPT was analyzed for each of the risk groups. Results were compared to a previous cohort from 2012/2013 (immediately after the introduction of NIPT, group 2, n = 1178). Results Group 1 showed a significant increase in the use of NIPT as part of FTS (29.5% vs. 3.7% for group 2, p = 0.001) in all three risk groups. Overall IPT rates were lower in group 1 (8.6%) vs. group 2 (11.3%, p = 0.038), mainly due to a significant reduction of IPT in the intermediate risk group. IPT rates in the high-risk group remained stable over time. Conclusion Appropriate clinical implementation of NIPT is still currently a challenge for prenatal medicine experts. Our data suggest that widespread uptake of NIPT is becoming more common these days; however, a contingent approach might prevent redundant uptake. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9525146/ /pubmed/36186146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1787-8803 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Walter, Adeline
Simonini, Corinna
Gembruch, Ulrich
Flöck, Anne
Strizek, Brigitte
Geipel, Annegret
First Trimester Screening – Current Status and Future Prospects After Introduction of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) at a Tertiary Referral Center
title First Trimester Screening – Current Status and Future Prospects After Introduction of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) at a Tertiary Referral Center
title_full First Trimester Screening – Current Status and Future Prospects After Introduction of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) at a Tertiary Referral Center
title_fullStr First Trimester Screening – Current Status and Future Prospects After Introduction of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) at a Tertiary Referral Center
title_full_unstemmed First Trimester Screening – Current Status and Future Prospects After Introduction of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) at a Tertiary Referral Center
title_short First Trimester Screening – Current Status and Future Prospects After Introduction of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) at a Tertiary Referral Center
title_sort first trimester screening – current status and future prospects after introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing (nipt) at a tertiary referral center
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9525146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36186146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1787-8803
work_keys_str_mv AT walteradeline firsttrimesterscreeningcurrentstatusandfutureprospectsafterintroductionofnoninvasiveprenataltestingniptatatertiaryreferralcenter
AT simoninicorinna firsttrimesterscreeningcurrentstatusandfutureprospectsafterintroductionofnoninvasiveprenataltestingniptatatertiaryreferralcenter
AT gembruchulrich firsttrimesterscreeningcurrentstatusandfutureprospectsafterintroductionofnoninvasiveprenataltestingniptatatertiaryreferralcenter
AT flockanne firsttrimesterscreeningcurrentstatusandfutureprospectsafterintroductionofnoninvasiveprenataltestingniptatatertiaryreferralcenter
AT strizekbrigitte firsttrimesterscreeningcurrentstatusandfutureprospectsafterintroductionofnoninvasiveprenataltestingniptatatertiaryreferralcenter
AT geipelannegret firsttrimesterscreeningcurrentstatusandfutureprospectsafterintroductionofnoninvasiveprenataltestingniptatatertiaryreferralcenter