Cargando…

The Impact of Funding Inpatient Treatments for COVID-19 on Health Equity in the United States: A Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a distributional cost-effectiveness analysis (DCEA) to evaluate how Medicare funding of inpatient COVID-19 treatments affected health equity in the United States. METHODS: A DCEA, based on an existing cost-effectiveness analysis model, was conducted from the perspective of a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kowal, Stacey, Ng, Carmen D., Schuldt, Robert, Sheinson, Daniel, Cookson, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9525218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36192293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2022.08.010
_version_ 1784800660197212160
author Kowal, Stacey
Ng, Carmen D.
Schuldt, Robert
Sheinson, Daniel
Cookson, Richard
author_facet Kowal, Stacey
Ng, Carmen D.
Schuldt, Robert
Sheinson, Daniel
Cookson, Richard
author_sort Kowal, Stacey
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We conducted a distributional cost-effectiveness analysis (DCEA) to evaluate how Medicare funding of inpatient COVID-19 treatments affected health equity in the United States. METHODS: A DCEA, based on an existing cost-effectiveness analysis model, was conducted from the perspective of a single US payer, Medicare. The US population was divided based on race and ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic black, and non-Hispanic white) and county-level social vulnerability index (5 quintile groups) into 15 equity-relevant subgroups. The baseline distribution of quality-adjusted life expectancy was estimated across the equity subgroups. Opportunity costs were estimated by converting total spend on COVID-19 inpatient treatments into health losses, expressed as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), using base-case assumptions of an opportunity cost threshold of $150 000 per QALY gained and an equal distribution of opportunity costs across equity-relevant subgroups. RESULTS: More socially vulnerable populations received larger per capita health benefits due to higher COVID-19 incidence and baseline in-hospital mortality. The total direct medical cost of inpatient COVID-19 interventions in the United States in 2020 was estimated at $25.83 billion with an estimated net benefit of 735 569 QALYs after adjusting for opportunity costs. Funding inpatient COVID-19 treatment reduced the population-level burden of health inequality by 0.234%. Conclusions remained robust across scenario and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first DCEA to quantify the equity implications of funding COVID-19 treatments in the United States. Medicare funding of COVID-19 treatments in the United States could improve overall health while reducing existing health inequalities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9525218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95252182022-10-03 The Impact of Funding Inpatient Treatments for COVID-19 on Health Equity in the United States: A Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Kowal, Stacey Ng, Carmen D. Schuldt, Robert Sheinson, Daniel Cookson, Richard Value Health Economic Evaluation OBJECTIVES: We conducted a distributional cost-effectiveness analysis (DCEA) to evaluate how Medicare funding of inpatient COVID-19 treatments affected health equity in the United States. METHODS: A DCEA, based on an existing cost-effectiveness analysis model, was conducted from the perspective of a single US payer, Medicare. The US population was divided based on race and ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic black, and non-Hispanic white) and county-level social vulnerability index (5 quintile groups) into 15 equity-relevant subgroups. The baseline distribution of quality-adjusted life expectancy was estimated across the equity subgroups. Opportunity costs were estimated by converting total spend on COVID-19 inpatient treatments into health losses, expressed as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), using base-case assumptions of an opportunity cost threshold of $150 000 per QALY gained and an equal distribution of opportunity costs across equity-relevant subgroups. RESULTS: More socially vulnerable populations received larger per capita health benefits due to higher COVID-19 incidence and baseline in-hospital mortality. The total direct medical cost of inpatient COVID-19 interventions in the United States in 2020 was estimated at $25.83 billion with an estimated net benefit of 735 569 QALYs after adjusting for opportunity costs. Funding inpatient COVID-19 treatment reduced the population-level burden of health inequality by 0.234%. Conclusions remained robust across scenario and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first DCEA to quantify the equity implications of funding COVID-19 treatments in the United States. Medicare funding of COVID-19 treatments in the United States could improve overall health while reducing existing health inequalities. International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2023-02 2022-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9525218/ /pubmed/36192293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2022.08.010 Text en © 2022 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Economic Evaluation
Kowal, Stacey
Ng, Carmen D.
Schuldt, Robert
Sheinson, Daniel
Cookson, Richard
The Impact of Funding Inpatient Treatments for COVID-19 on Health Equity in the United States: A Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title The Impact of Funding Inpatient Treatments for COVID-19 on Health Equity in the United States: A Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_full The Impact of Funding Inpatient Treatments for COVID-19 on Health Equity in the United States: A Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_fullStr The Impact of Funding Inpatient Treatments for COVID-19 on Health Equity in the United States: A Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Funding Inpatient Treatments for COVID-19 on Health Equity in the United States: A Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_short The Impact of Funding Inpatient Treatments for COVID-19 on Health Equity in the United States: A Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_sort impact of funding inpatient treatments for covid-19 on health equity in the united states: a distributional cost-effectiveness analysis
topic Economic Evaluation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9525218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36192293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2022.08.010
work_keys_str_mv AT kowalstacey theimpactoffundinginpatienttreatmentsforcovid19onhealthequityintheunitedstatesadistributionalcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT ngcarmend theimpactoffundinginpatienttreatmentsforcovid19onhealthequityintheunitedstatesadistributionalcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT schuldtrobert theimpactoffundinginpatienttreatmentsforcovid19onhealthequityintheunitedstatesadistributionalcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT sheinsondaniel theimpactoffundinginpatienttreatmentsforcovid19onhealthequityintheunitedstatesadistributionalcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT cooksonrichard theimpactoffundinginpatienttreatmentsforcovid19onhealthequityintheunitedstatesadistributionalcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT kowalstacey impactoffundinginpatienttreatmentsforcovid19onhealthequityintheunitedstatesadistributionalcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT ngcarmend impactoffundinginpatienttreatmentsforcovid19onhealthequityintheunitedstatesadistributionalcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT schuldtrobert impactoffundinginpatienttreatmentsforcovid19onhealthequityintheunitedstatesadistributionalcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT sheinsondaniel impactoffundinginpatienttreatmentsforcovid19onhealthequityintheunitedstatesadistributionalcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT cooksonrichard impactoffundinginpatienttreatmentsforcovid19onhealthequityintheunitedstatesadistributionalcosteffectivenessanalysis