Cargando…

Comparing two machine learning approaches in predicting lupus hospitalization using longitudinal data

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease characterized by flares ranging from mild to life-threatening. Severe flares and complications can require hospitalizations, which account for most of the direct costs of SLE care. This study investigates two machine learning a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Yijun, Smith, Dylan, Jorge, April
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9525268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36180726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20845-w
_version_ 1784800671575310336
author Zhao, Yijun
Smith, Dylan
Jorge, April
author_facet Zhao, Yijun
Smith, Dylan
Jorge, April
author_sort Zhao, Yijun
collection PubMed
description Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease characterized by flares ranging from mild to life-threatening. Severe flares and complications can require hospitalizations, which account for most of the direct costs of SLE care. This study investigates two machine learning approaches in predicting SLE hospitalizations using longitudinal data from 925 patients enrolled in a multicenter electronic health record (EHR)-based lupus cohort. Our first Differential approach accounts for the time dependencies in sequential data by introducing additional lagged variables between consecutive time steps. We next evaluate the performance of LSTM, a state-of-the-art deep learning model designed for time series. Our experimental results demonstrate that both methods can effectively predict lupus hospitalizations, but each has its strengths and limitations. Specifically, the Differential approach can be integrated into any non-temporal machine learning algorithms and is preferred for tasks with short observation periods. On the contrary, the LSTM model is desirable for studies utilizing long observation intervals attributing to its capability in capturing long-term dependencies embedded in the longitudinal data. Furthermore, the Differential approach has more options in handling class imbalance in the underlying data and delivers stable performance across different prognostic horizons. LSTM, on the other hand, demands more class-balanced training data and outperforms the Differential approach when there are sufficient positive samples facilitating model training. Capitalizing on our experimental results, we further study the optimal length of patient monitoring periods for different prediction horizons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9525268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95252682022-10-02 Comparing two machine learning approaches in predicting lupus hospitalization using longitudinal data Zhao, Yijun Smith, Dylan Jorge, April Sci Rep Article Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease characterized by flares ranging from mild to life-threatening. Severe flares and complications can require hospitalizations, which account for most of the direct costs of SLE care. This study investigates two machine learning approaches in predicting SLE hospitalizations using longitudinal data from 925 patients enrolled in a multicenter electronic health record (EHR)-based lupus cohort. Our first Differential approach accounts for the time dependencies in sequential data by introducing additional lagged variables between consecutive time steps. We next evaluate the performance of LSTM, a state-of-the-art deep learning model designed for time series. Our experimental results demonstrate that both methods can effectively predict lupus hospitalizations, but each has its strengths and limitations. Specifically, the Differential approach can be integrated into any non-temporal machine learning algorithms and is preferred for tasks with short observation periods. On the contrary, the LSTM model is desirable for studies utilizing long observation intervals attributing to its capability in capturing long-term dependencies embedded in the longitudinal data. Furthermore, the Differential approach has more options in handling class imbalance in the underlying data and delivers stable performance across different prognostic horizons. LSTM, on the other hand, demands more class-balanced training data and outperforms the Differential approach when there are sufficient positive samples facilitating model training. Capitalizing on our experimental results, we further study the optimal length of patient monitoring periods for different prediction horizons. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9525268/ /pubmed/36180726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20845-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Zhao, Yijun
Smith, Dylan
Jorge, April
Comparing two machine learning approaches in predicting lupus hospitalization using longitudinal data
title Comparing two machine learning approaches in predicting lupus hospitalization using longitudinal data
title_full Comparing two machine learning approaches in predicting lupus hospitalization using longitudinal data
title_fullStr Comparing two machine learning approaches in predicting lupus hospitalization using longitudinal data
title_full_unstemmed Comparing two machine learning approaches in predicting lupus hospitalization using longitudinal data
title_short Comparing two machine learning approaches in predicting lupus hospitalization using longitudinal data
title_sort comparing two machine learning approaches in predicting lupus hospitalization using longitudinal data
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9525268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36180726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20845-w
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoyijun comparingtwomachinelearningapproachesinpredictinglupushospitalizationusinglongitudinaldata
AT smithdylan comparingtwomachinelearningapproachesinpredictinglupushospitalizationusinglongitudinaldata
AT jorgeapril comparingtwomachinelearningapproachesinpredictinglupushospitalizationusinglongitudinaldata