Cargando…

Sirolimus as a second-line treatment for Graves’ orbitopathy

OBJECTIVES: A beneficial effect of sirolimus in Graves’ orbitopathy (GO) was reported, suggesting a possible use in clinical practice. We conducted an observational, single-centre, no-profit, clinical study to investigate the efficacy of sirolimus as a second-line treatment for moderate-to-severe, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lanzolla, G., Maglionico, M. N., Comi, S., Menconi, F., Piaggi, P., Posarelli, C., Figus, M., Marcocci, C., Marinò, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9525329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35831587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40618-022-01862-y
_version_ 1784800682214162432
author Lanzolla, G.
Maglionico, M. N.
Comi, S.
Menconi, F.
Piaggi, P.
Posarelli, C.
Figus, M.
Marcocci, C.
Marinò, M.
author_facet Lanzolla, G.
Maglionico, M. N.
Comi, S.
Menconi, F.
Piaggi, P.
Posarelli, C.
Figus, M.
Marcocci, C.
Marinò, M.
author_sort Lanzolla, G.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: A beneficial effect of sirolimus in Graves’ orbitopathy (GO) was reported, suggesting a possible use in clinical practice. We conducted an observational, single-centre, no-profit, clinical study to investigate the efficacy of sirolimus as a second-line treatment for moderate-to-severe, active GO compared with methylprednisolone. METHODS: Data from consecutive patients given sirolimus (2 mg orally on first day, followed by 0.5 mg/day for 12 weeks) or methylprednisolone [500 mg iv/weekly (6 weeks), 250 mg/weekly (6 weeks)] as a second-line treatment were collected and compared. Primary objective: overall GO outcome at 24 weeks, based on a composite evaluation. Secondary objectives at 24 weeks: (1) improvement in quality of life, evaluated using a specific uestionnaire (GO-QoL); (2) reduction in proptosis; (3) reduction in the clinical activity score (CAS); (4) improvement of eye ductions; and (5) reduction in eyelid aperture. RESULTS: Data from 30 patients (15 per group) treated between January 15, 2020, and June 15, 2021, were analysed. Proportion of GO responders (primary outcome) at 24 weeks was significantly greater in sirolimus group compared with methylprednisolone group (86.6% vs 26.6%; OR: 17.8; 95% CI from 2.7 to 116.8; P = 0.0026). GO-quality of life (GO-QoL) score was greater in sirolimus group. Proportion of proptosis responders was greater in sirolimus group, as well as proportion of clinical activity score (CAS) responders. No serious adverse events were observed, with no differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Sirolimus seems to be an effective second-line treatment for GO. Further randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm our observations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9525329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95253292022-10-02 Sirolimus as a second-line treatment for Graves’ orbitopathy Lanzolla, G. Maglionico, M. N. Comi, S. Menconi, F. Piaggi, P. Posarelli, C. Figus, M. Marcocci, C. Marinò, M. J Endocrinol Invest Original Article OBJECTIVES: A beneficial effect of sirolimus in Graves’ orbitopathy (GO) was reported, suggesting a possible use in clinical practice. We conducted an observational, single-centre, no-profit, clinical study to investigate the efficacy of sirolimus as a second-line treatment for moderate-to-severe, active GO compared with methylprednisolone. METHODS: Data from consecutive patients given sirolimus (2 mg orally on first day, followed by 0.5 mg/day for 12 weeks) or methylprednisolone [500 mg iv/weekly (6 weeks), 250 mg/weekly (6 weeks)] as a second-line treatment were collected and compared. Primary objective: overall GO outcome at 24 weeks, based on a composite evaluation. Secondary objectives at 24 weeks: (1) improvement in quality of life, evaluated using a specific uestionnaire (GO-QoL); (2) reduction in proptosis; (3) reduction in the clinical activity score (CAS); (4) improvement of eye ductions; and (5) reduction in eyelid aperture. RESULTS: Data from 30 patients (15 per group) treated between January 15, 2020, and June 15, 2021, were analysed. Proportion of GO responders (primary outcome) at 24 weeks was significantly greater in sirolimus group compared with methylprednisolone group (86.6% vs 26.6%; OR: 17.8; 95% CI from 2.7 to 116.8; P = 0.0026). GO-quality of life (GO-QoL) score was greater in sirolimus group. Proportion of proptosis responders was greater in sirolimus group, as well as proportion of clinical activity score (CAS) responders. No serious adverse events were observed, with no differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Sirolimus seems to be an effective second-line treatment for GO. Further randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm our observations. Springer International Publishing 2022-07-13 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9525329/ /pubmed/35831587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40618-022-01862-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Lanzolla, G.
Maglionico, M. N.
Comi, S.
Menconi, F.
Piaggi, P.
Posarelli, C.
Figus, M.
Marcocci, C.
Marinò, M.
Sirolimus as a second-line treatment for Graves’ orbitopathy
title Sirolimus as a second-line treatment for Graves’ orbitopathy
title_full Sirolimus as a second-line treatment for Graves’ orbitopathy
title_fullStr Sirolimus as a second-line treatment for Graves’ orbitopathy
title_full_unstemmed Sirolimus as a second-line treatment for Graves’ orbitopathy
title_short Sirolimus as a second-line treatment for Graves’ orbitopathy
title_sort sirolimus as a second-line treatment for graves’ orbitopathy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9525329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35831587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40618-022-01862-y
work_keys_str_mv AT lanzollag sirolimusasasecondlinetreatmentforgravesorbitopathy
AT maglionicomn sirolimusasasecondlinetreatmentforgravesorbitopathy
AT comis sirolimusasasecondlinetreatmentforgravesorbitopathy
AT menconif sirolimusasasecondlinetreatmentforgravesorbitopathy
AT piaggip sirolimusasasecondlinetreatmentforgravesorbitopathy
AT posarellic sirolimusasasecondlinetreatmentforgravesorbitopathy
AT figusm sirolimusasasecondlinetreatmentforgravesorbitopathy
AT marcoccic sirolimusasasecondlinetreatmentforgravesorbitopathy
AT marinom sirolimusasasecondlinetreatmentforgravesorbitopathy