Cargando…

Neurodevelopmental toxicity assessment of flame retardants using a human DNT in vitro testing battery

Due to their neurodevelopmental toxicity, flame retardants (FRs) like polybrominated diphenyl ethers are banned from the market and replaced by alternative FRs, like organophosphorus FRs, that have mostly unknown toxicological profiles. To study their neurodevelopmental toxicity, we evaluated the ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klose, Jördis, Pahl, Melanie, Bartmann, Kristina, Bendt, Farina, Blum, Jonathan, Dolde, Xenia, Förster, Nils, Holzer, Anna-Katharina, Hübenthal, Ulrike, Keßel, Hagen Eike, Koch, Katharina, Masjosthusmann, Stefan, Schneider, Sabine, Stürzl, Lynn-Christin, Woeste, Selina, Rossi, Andrea, Covaci, Adrian, Behl, Mamta, Leist, Marcel, Tigges, Julia, Fritsche, Ellen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9525352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33969458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10565-021-09603-2
_version_ 1784800687296610304
author Klose, Jördis
Pahl, Melanie
Bartmann, Kristina
Bendt, Farina
Blum, Jonathan
Dolde, Xenia
Förster, Nils
Holzer, Anna-Katharina
Hübenthal, Ulrike
Keßel, Hagen Eike
Koch, Katharina
Masjosthusmann, Stefan
Schneider, Sabine
Stürzl, Lynn-Christin
Woeste, Selina
Rossi, Andrea
Covaci, Adrian
Behl, Mamta
Leist, Marcel
Tigges, Julia
Fritsche, Ellen
author_facet Klose, Jördis
Pahl, Melanie
Bartmann, Kristina
Bendt, Farina
Blum, Jonathan
Dolde, Xenia
Förster, Nils
Holzer, Anna-Katharina
Hübenthal, Ulrike
Keßel, Hagen Eike
Koch, Katharina
Masjosthusmann, Stefan
Schneider, Sabine
Stürzl, Lynn-Christin
Woeste, Selina
Rossi, Andrea
Covaci, Adrian
Behl, Mamta
Leist, Marcel
Tigges, Julia
Fritsche, Ellen
author_sort Klose, Jördis
collection PubMed
description Due to their neurodevelopmental toxicity, flame retardants (FRs) like polybrominated diphenyl ethers are banned from the market and replaced by alternative FRs, like organophosphorus FRs, that have mostly unknown toxicological profiles. To study their neurodevelopmental toxicity, we evaluated the hazard of several FRs including phased-out polybrominated FRs and organophosphorus FRs: 2,2′,4,4′-tetrabromodiphenylether (BDE-47), 2,2′,4,4′,5-pentabromodiphenylether (BDE-99), tetrabromobisphenol A, triphenyl phosphate, tris(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate and its metabolite bis-(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate, isodecyl diphenyl phosphate, triphenyl isopropylated phosphate, tricresyl phosphate, tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate, tert-butylphenyl diphenyl phosphate, 2-ethylhexyl diphenyl phosphate, tris(1-chloroisopropyl) phosphate, and tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate. Therefore, we used a human cell–based developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) in vitro battery covering a large variety of neurodevelopmental endpoints. Potency according to the respective most sensitive benchmark concentration (BMC) across the battery ranked from <1 μM (5 FRs), 1<10 μM (7 FRs) to the >10 μM range (3 FRs). Evaluation of the data with the ToxPi tool revealed a distinct ranking (a) than with the BMC and (b) compared to the ToxCast data, suggesting that DNT hazard of these FRs is not well predicted by ToxCast assays. Extrapolating the DNT in vitro battery BMCs to human FR exposure via breast milk suggests low risk for individual compounds. However, it raises a potential concern for real-life mixture exposure, especially when different compounds converge through diverse modes-of-action on common endpoints, like oligodendrocyte differentiation in this study. This case study using FRs suggests that human cell–based DNT in vitro battery is a promising approach for neurodevelopmental hazard assessment and compound prioritization in risk assessment. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10565-021-09603-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9525352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95253522022-10-02 Neurodevelopmental toxicity assessment of flame retardants using a human DNT in vitro testing battery Klose, Jördis Pahl, Melanie Bartmann, Kristina Bendt, Farina Blum, Jonathan Dolde, Xenia Förster, Nils Holzer, Anna-Katharina Hübenthal, Ulrike Keßel, Hagen Eike Koch, Katharina Masjosthusmann, Stefan Schneider, Sabine Stürzl, Lynn-Christin Woeste, Selina Rossi, Andrea Covaci, Adrian Behl, Mamta Leist, Marcel Tigges, Julia Fritsche, Ellen Cell Biol Toxicol Original Article Due to their neurodevelopmental toxicity, flame retardants (FRs) like polybrominated diphenyl ethers are banned from the market and replaced by alternative FRs, like organophosphorus FRs, that have mostly unknown toxicological profiles. To study their neurodevelopmental toxicity, we evaluated the hazard of several FRs including phased-out polybrominated FRs and organophosphorus FRs: 2,2′,4,4′-tetrabromodiphenylether (BDE-47), 2,2′,4,4′,5-pentabromodiphenylether (BDE-99), tetrabromobisphenol A, triphenyl phosphate, tris(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate and its metabolite bis-(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate, isodecyl diphenyl phosphate, triphenyl isopropylated phosphate, tricresyl phosphate, tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate, tert-butylphenyl diphenyl phosphate, 2-ethylhexyl diphenyl phosphate, tris(1-chloroisopropyl) phosphate, and tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate. Therefore, we used a human cell–based developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) in vitro battery covering a large variety of neurodevelopmental endpoints. Potency according to the respective most sensitive benchmark concentration (BMC) across the battery ranked from <1 μM (5 FRs), 1<10 μM (7 FRs) to the >10 μM range (3 FRs). Evaluation of the data with the ToxPi tool revealed a distinct ranking (a) than with the BMC and (b) compared to the ToxCast data, suggesting that DNT hazard of these FRs is not well predicted by ToxCast assays. Extrapolating the DNT in vitro battery BMCs to human FR exposure via breast milk suggests low risk for individual compounds. However, it raises a potential concern for real-life mixture exposure, especially when different compounds converge through diverse modes-of-action on common endpoints, like oligodendrocyte differentiation in this study. This case study using FRs suggests that human cell–based DNT in vitro battery is a promising approach for neurodevelopmental hazard assessment and compound prioritization in risk assessment. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10565-021-09603-2. Springer Netherlands 2021-05-10 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9525352/ /pubmed/33969458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10565-021-09603-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Klose, Jördis
Pahl, Melanie
Bartmann, Kristina
Bendt, Farina
Blum, Jonathan
Dolde, Xenia
Förster, Nils
Holzer, Anna-Katharina
Hübenthal, Ulrike
Keßel, Hagen Eike
Koch, Katharina
Masjosthusmann, Stefan
Schneider, Sabine
Stürzl, Lynn-Christin
Woeste, Selina
Rossi, Andrea
Covaci, Adrian
Behl, Mamta
Leist, Marcel
Tigges, Julia
Fritsche, Ellen
Neurodevelopmental toxicity assessment of flame retardants using a human DNT in vitro testing battery
title Neurodevelopmental toxicity assessment of flame retardants using a human DNT in vitro testing battery
title_full Neurodevelopmental toxicity assessment of flame retardants using a human DNT in vitro testing battery
title_fullStr Neurodevelopmental toxicity assessment of flame retardants using a human DNT in vitro testing battery
title_full_unstemmed Neurodevelopmental toxicity assessment of flame retardants using a human DNT in vitro testing battery
title_short Neurodevelopmental toxicity assessment of flame retardants using a human DNT in vitro testing battery
title_sort neurodevelopmental toxicity assessment of flame retardants using a human dnt in vitro testing battery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9525352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33969458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10565-021-09603-2
work_keys_str_mv AT klosejordis neurodevelopmentaltoxicityassessmentofflameretardantsusingahumandntinvitrotestingbattery
AT pahlmelanie neurodevelopmentaltoxicityassessmentofflameretardantsusingahumandntinvitrotestingbattery
AT bartmannkristina neurodevelopmentaltoxicityassessmentofflameretardantsusingahumandntinvitrotestingbattery
AT bendtfarina neurodevelopmentaltoxicityassessmentofflameretardantsusingahumandntinvitrotestingbattery
AT blumjonathan neurodevelopmentaltoxicityassessmentofflameretardantsusingahumandntinvitrotestingbattery
AT doldexenia neurodevelopmentaltoxicityassessmentofflameretardantsusingahumandntinvitrotestingbattery
AT forsternils neurodevelopmentaltoxicityassessmentofflameretardantsusingahumandntinvitrotestingbattery
AT holzerannakatharina neurodevelopmentaltoxicityassessmentofflameretardantsusingahumandntinvitrotestingbattery
AT hubenthalulrike neurodevelopmentaltoxicityassessmentofflameretardantsusingahumandntinvitrotestingbattery
AT keßelhageneike neurodevelopmentaltoxicityassessmentofflameretardantsusingahumandntinvitrotestingbattery
AT kochkatharina neurodevelopmentaltoxicityassessmentofflameretardantsusingahumandntinvitrotestingbattery
AT masjosthusmannstefan neurodevelopmentaltoxicityassessmentofflameretardantsusingahumandntinvitrotestingbattery
AT schneidersabine neurodevelopmentaltoxicityassessmentofflameretardantsusingahumandntinvitrotestingbattery
AT sturzllynnchristin neurodevelopmentaltoxicityassessmentofflameretardantsusingahumandntinvitrotestingbattery
AT woesteselina neurodevelopmentaltoxicityassessmentofflameretardantsusingahumandntinvitrotestingbattery
AT rossiandrea neurodevelopmentaltoxicityassessmentofflameretardantsusingahumandntinvitrotestingbattery
AT covaciadrian neurodevelopmentaltoxicityassessmentofflameretardantsusingahumandntinvitrotestingbattery
AT behlmamta neurodevelopmentaltoxicityassessmentofflameretardantsusingahumandntinvitrotestingbattery
AT leistmarcel neurodevelopmentaltoxicityassessmentofflameretardantsusingahumandntinvitrotestingbattery
AT tiggesjulia neurodevelopmentaltoxicityassessmentofflameretardantsusingahumandntinvitrotestingbattery
AT fritscheellen neurodevelopmentaltoxicityassessmentofflameretardantsusingahumandntinvitrotestingbattery