Cargando…

D-dimer, a predictor of bad outcome in gastric cancer patients undergoing radical resection

As a marker of hypercoagulability, plasma D-dimer is associated with progression of many cancers but remains controversial in gastric cancer (GC). We aim to investigate the predictive value of D-dimer for postoperative outcomes after radical gastrectomy of GC patients. We enrolled 903 consecutive pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Xin, Wang, Xuan, Li, Wenxing, Sun, Tuanhe, Dang, Chengxue, Diao, Dongmei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9525585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36180481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16582-9
_version_ 1784800716840239104
author Zhang, Xin
Wang, Xuan
Li, Wenxing
Sun, Tuanhe
Dang, Chengxue
Diao, Dongmei
author_facet Zhang, Xin
Wang, Xuan
Li, Wenxing
Sun, Tuanhe
Dang, Chengxue
Diao, Dongmei
author_sort Zhang, Xin
collection PubMed
description As a marker of hypercoagulability, plasma D-dimer is associated with progression of many cancers but remains controversial in gastric cancer (GC). We aim to investigate the predictive value of D-dimer for postoperative outcomes after radical gastrectomy of GC patients. We enrolled 903 consecutive patients with GC who underwent radical gastrectomy and the clinicopathological characteristics were compared. Risk factors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were determined using multivariate cox regression analysis. We also compared the survival difference based on Kaplan–Meier method after a one-to-one propensity score matching (PSM). Patients with elevated D-dimer had older age (p < 0.001), advanced TNM stage (p < 0.001), larger tumor size (p = 0.005), lower 5-year OS rate (32.8% vs 62.6%, p < 0.001) and DFS (29% vs 59.6%, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, elevated D-dimer was independently associated with shorter OS [hazard ratio (HR): 1.633, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.178–2.264, p = 0.003] and DFS (HR: 1.58, 95% CI 1.151–2.169, P = 0.005). After PSM, the 5-year OS rate of patients with elevated D-dimer was still significantly lower than matched group (32.8% vs 40.6%, p = 0.005), so was DFS (29% vs 36.6%, p = 0.008). Preoperative elevated D-dimer is an independent risk factor for GC patients undergoing curative gastrectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9525585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95255852022-10-02 D-dimer, a predictor of bad outcome in gastric cancer patients undergoing radical resection Zhang, Xin Wang, Xuan Li, Wenxing Sun, Tuanhe Dang, Chengxue Diao, Dongmei Sci Rep Article As a marker of hypercoagulability, plasma D-dimer is associated with progression of many cancers but remains controversial in gastric cancer (GC). We aim to investigate the predictive value of D-dimer for postoperative outcomes after radical gastrectomy of GC patients. We enrolled 903 consecutive patients with GC who underwent radical gastrectomy and the clinicopathological characteristics were compared. Risk factors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were determined using multivariate cox regression analysis. We also compared the survival difference based on Kaplan–Meier method after a one-to-one propensity score matching (PSM). Patients with elevated D-dimer had older age (p < 0.001), advanced TNM stage (p < 0.001), larger tumor size (p = 0.005), lower 5-year OS rate (32.8% vs 62.6%, p < 0.001) and DFS (29% vs 59.6%, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, elevated D-dimer was independently associated with shorter OS [hazard ratio (HR): 1.633, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.178–2.264, p = 0.003] and DFS (HR: 1.58, 95% CI 1.151–2.169, P = 0.005). After PSM, the 5-year OS rate of patients with elevated D-dimer was still significantly lower than matched group (32.8% vs 40.6%, p = 0.005), so was DFS (29% vs 36.6%, p = 0.008). Preoperative elevated D-dimer is an independent risk factor for GC patients undergoing curative gastrectomy. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9525585/ /pubmed/36180481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16582-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Xin
Wang, Xuan
Li, Wenxing
Sun, Tuanhe
Dang, Chengxue
Diao, Dongmei
D-dimer, a predictor of bad outcome in gastric cancer patients undergoing radical resection
title D-dimer, a predictor of bad outcome in gastric cancer patients undergoing radical resection
title_full D-dimer, a predictor of bad outcome in gastric cancer patients undergoing radical resection
title_fullStr D-dimer, a predictor of bad outcome in gastric cancer patients undergoing radical resection
title_full_unstemmed D-dimer, a predictor of bad outcome in gastric cancer patients undergoing radical resection
title_short D-dimer, a predictor of bad outcome in gastric cancer patients undergoing radical resection
title_sort d-dimer, a predictor of bad outcome in gastric cancer patients undergoing radical resection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9525585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36180481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16582-9
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxin ddimerapredictorofbadoutcomeingastriccancerpatientsundergoingradicalresection
AT wangxuan ddimerapredictorofbadoutcomeingastriccancerpatientsundergoingradicalresection
AT liwenxing ddimerapredictorofbadoutcomeingastriccancerpatientsundergoingradicalresection
AT suntuanhe ddimerapredictorofbadoutcomeingastriccancerpatientsundergoingradicalresection
AT dangchengxue ddimerapredictorofbadoutcomeingastriccancerpatientsundergoingradicalresection
AT diaodongmei ddimerapredictorofbadoutcomeingastriccancerpatientsundergoingradicalresection