Cargando…

Intra-articular lidocaine versus intravenous sedation for closed reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocation in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: Anterior shoulder dislocations are commonly treated in the emergency department (ED). Analgesia for reduction is provided by intra-articular lidocaine (IAL) injection or intravenous sedation (IV sedation). The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare IAL versus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sithamparapillai, Arjun, Grewal, Keerat, Thompson, Cameron, Walsh, Chris, McLeod, Shelley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9525937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36181665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43678-022-00368-z
_version_ 1784800777076736000
author Sithamparapillai, Arjun
Grewal, Keerat
Thompson, Cameron
Walsh, Chris
McLeod, Shelley
author_facet Sithamparapillai, Arjun
Grewal, Keerat
Thompson, Cameron
Walsh, Chris
McLeod, Shelley
author_sort Sithamparapillai, Arjun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Anterior shoulder dislocations are commonly treated in the emergency department (ED). Analgesia for reduction is provided by intra-articular lidocaine (IAL) injection or intravenous sedation (IV sedation). The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare IAL versus IV sedation for closed reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocation in the ED. METHODS: Electronic searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE (1946–September 2021) were completed and reference lists were hand-searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IAL and IV sedation for reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocations among patients ≥ 15 years old in the ED were included. Outcomes of interest included a successful reduction, adverse events, ED length of stay, pain scores, procedure time, ease of reduction, patient satisfaction, and cost. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts, assessed study quality and extracted data. Data were pooled using random-effects models and reported as mean differences and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: 12 RCTs were included with a total of 630 patients (IAL = 327; IV sedation = 303). There was no difference in reduction success between IAL and IV sedation (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.86–1.01, I(2) = 69%), significantly lower adverse events with IAL (RR 0.16; 95% CI 0.07–0.33, I(2) = 0%), shorter ED length of stay with IAL (mean difference − 1.48; 95% CI − 2.48 to − 0.47, I(2) = 93%), no difference in pain scores post-analgesia and no difference in ease of reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-articular lidocaine may have similar effectiveness as IV sedation in the successful reduction of anterior shoulder dislocations in the ED with fewer adverse events, shorter ED length of stay, and no difference in pain scores or ease of reduction. Intra-articular lidocaine may be an effective alternative to IV sedation for reducing anterior shoulder dislocations, particularly when IV sedation is contraindicated or not feasible. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43678-022-00368-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9525937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95259372022-10-03 Intra-articular lidocaine versus intravenous sedation for closed reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocation in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis Sithamparapillai, Arjun Grewal, Keerat Thompson, Cameron Walsh, Chris McLeod, Shelley CJEM Original Research OBJECTIVE: Anterior shoulder dislocations are commonly treated in the emergency department (ED). Analgesia for reduction is provided by intra-articular lidocaine (IAL) injection or intravenous sedation (IV sedation). The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare IAL versus IV sedation for closed reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocation in the ED. METHODS: Electronic searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE (1946–September 2021) were completed and reference lists were hand-searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IAL and IV sedation for reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocations among patients ≥ 15 years old in the ED were included. Outcomes of interest included a successful reduction, adverse events, ED length of stay, pain scores, procedure time, ease of reduction, patient satisfaction, and cost. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts, assessed study quality and extracted data. Data were pooled using random-effects models and reported as mean differences and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: 12 RCTs were included with a total of 630 patients (IAL = 327; IV sedation = 303). There was no difference in reduction success between IAL and IV sedation (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.86–1.01, I(2) = 69%), significantly lower adverse events with IAL (RR 0.16; 95% CI 0.07–0.33, I(2) = 0%), shorter ED length of stay with IAL (mean difference − 1.48; 95% CI − 2.48 to − 0.47, I(2) = 93%), no difference in pain scores post-analgesia and no difference in ease of reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-articular lidocaine may have similar effectiveness as IV sedation in the successful reduction of anterior shoulder dislocations in the ED with fewer adverse events, shorter ED length of stay, and no difference in pain scores or ease of reduction. Intra-articular lidocaine may be an effective alternative to IV sedation for reducing anterior shoulder dislocations, particularly when IV sedation is contraindicated or not feasible. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43678-022-00368-z. Springer International Publishing 2022-10-01 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9525937/ /pubmed/36181665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43678-022-00368-z Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP)/ Association Canadienne de Médecine d'Urgence (ACMU) 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sithamparapillai, Arjun
Grewal, Keerat
Thompson, Cameron
Walsh, Chris
McLeod, Shelley
Intra-articular lidocaine versus intravenous sedation for closed reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocation in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Intra-articular lidocaine versus intravenous sedation for closed reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocation in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Intra-articular lidocaine versus intravenous sedation for closed reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocation in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Intra-articular lidocaine versus intravenous sedation for closed reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocation in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Intra-articular lidocaine versus intravenous sedation for closed reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocation in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Intra-articular lidocaine versus intravenous sedation for closed reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocation in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort intra-articular lidocaine versus intravenous sedation for closed reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocation in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9525937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36181665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43678-022-00368-z
work_keys_str_mv AT sithamparapillaiarjun intraarticularlidocaineversusintravenoussedationforclosedreductionofacuteanteriorshoulderdislocationintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT grewalkeerat intraarticularlidocaineversusintravenoussedationforclosedreductionofacuteanteriorshoulderdislocationintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT thompsoncameron intraarticularlidocaineversusintravenoussedationforclosedreductionofacuteanteriorshoulderdislocationintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT walshchris intraarticularlidocaineversusintravenoussedationforclosedreductionofacuteanteriorshoulderdislocationintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mcleodshelley intraarticularlidocaineversusintravenoussedationforclosedreductionofacuteanteriorshoulderdislocationintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis