Cargando…

Efficacy of a “provisional incision” for longitudinal flap division after free-flap surgery()

Fix and flap surgery for severe open limb fractures is already a standard treatment. In cases where the fracture is complicated or accompanied by bone defects, secondary surgery is required for fracture sites covered with a myocutaneous flap after the soft tissue condition has stabilized. We applied...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Izawa, Y., Murakami, H., Shirakawa, T., Nishida, M., Futamura, K., Kobayashi, Y., Tsuchida, Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9526011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36193166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2022.07.003
_version_ 1784800784837246976
author Izawa, Y.
Murakami, H.
Shirakawa, T.
Nishida, M.
Futamura, K.
Kobayashi, Y.
Tsuchida, Y.
author_facet Izawa, Y.
Murakami, H.
Shirakawa, T.
Nishida, M.
Futamura, K.
Kobayashi, Y.
Tsuchida, Y.
author_sort Izawa, Y.
collection PubMed
description Fix and flap surgery for severe open limb fractures is already a standard treatment. In cases where the fracture is complicated or accompanied by bone defects, secondary surgery is required for fracture sites covered with a myocutaneous flap after the soft tissue condition has stabilized. We applied the delayed procedure concept used for distant flaps and attempted to prevent postoperative myocutaneous flap necrosis by performing a provisional incision prior to the longitudinal incision of the flap. We report the course of five cases of the longitudinal division of the myocutaneous flap using “provisional incision” after free-flap surgery for severe open fracture and verify its usefulness. In this case series, five patients with severe open limb fractures treated from 2020 to 2021 who underwent longitudinal incision of the myocutaneous flap using provisional incision after free-flap surgery were included. The types of flaps used for soft tissue reconstruction in the acute phase, the reasons for the need for secondary surgery, the period from soft tissue reconstruction to additional surgery, and the healing status of soft tissue after secondary surgery were all investigated retrospectively. The types of flaps used for soft tissue reconstruction were latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap in four cases and anterolateral thigh flap in one case. The breakdown of secondary surgery was osteosynthesis in one case, plate removal in one case, and bone cement removal and autologous bone grafting in three cases. The period from soft tissue reconstruction to secondary surgery ranged from 6 weeks to 4 months. In all cases, the wound healed without necrosis of the myocutaneous flap. For the treatment of severe open limb fractures, longitudinal division of the myocutaneous flap using “provisional incision” is a safer approach to the necessary secondary surgery and reduces the possibility of necrosis of the flap.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9526011
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95260112022-10-02 Efficacy of a “provisional incision” for longitudinal flap division after free-flap surgery() Izawa, Y. Murakami, H. Shirakawa, T. Nishida, M. Futamura, K. Kobayashi, Y. Tsuchida, Y. JPRAS Open Original Article Fix and flap surgery for severe open limb fractures is already a standard treatment. In cases where the fracture is complicated or accompanied by bone defects, secondary surgery is required for fracture sites covered with a myocutaneous flap after the soft tissue condition has stabilized. We applied the delayed procedure concept used for distant flaps and attempted to prevent postoperative myocutaneous flap necrosis by performing a provisional incision prior to the longitudinal incision of the flap. We report the course of five cases of the longitudinal division of the myocutaneous flap using “provisional incision” after free-flap surgery for severe open fracture and verify its usefulness. In this case series, five patients with severe open limb fractures treated from 2020 to 2021 who underwent longitudinal incision of the myocutaneous flap using provisional incision after free-flap surgery were included. The types of flaps used for soft tissue reconstruction in the acute phase, the reasons for the need for secondary surgery, the period from soft tissue reconstruction to additional surgery, and the healing status of soft tissue after secondary surgery were all investigated retrospectively. The types of flaps used for soft tissue reconstruction were latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap in four cases and anterolateral thigh flap in one case. The breakdown of secondary surgery was osteosynthesis in one case, plate removal in one case, and bone cement removal and autologous bone grafting in three cases. The period from soft tissue reconstruction to secondary surgery ranged from 6 weeks to 4 months. In all cases, the wound healed without necrosis of the myocutaneous flap. For the treatment of severe open limb fractures, longitudinal division of the myocutaneous flap using “provisional incision” is a safer approach to the necessary secondary surgery and reduces the possibility of necrosis of the flap. Elsevier 2022-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9526011/ /pubmed/36193166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2022.07.003 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Izawa, Y.
Murakami, H.
Shirakawa, T.
Nishida, M.
Futamura, K.
Kobayashi, Y.
Tsuchida, Y.
Efficacy of a “provisional incision” for longitudinal flap division after free-flap surgery()
title Efficacy of a “provisional incision” for longitudinal flap division after free-flap surgery()
title_full Efficacy of a “provisional incision” for longitudinal flap division after free-flap surgery()
title_fullStr Efficacy of a “provisional incision” for longitudinal flap division after free-flap surgery()
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of a “provisional incision” for longitudinal flap division after free-flap surgery()
title_short Efficacy of a “provisional incision” for longitudinal flap division after free-flap surgery()
title_sort efficacy of a “provisional incision” for longitudinal flap division after free-flap surgery()
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9526011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36193166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2022.07.003
work_keys_str_mv AT izaway efficacyofaprovisionalincisionforlongitudinalflapdivisionafterfreeflapsurgery
AT murakamih efficacyofaprovisionalincisionforlongitudinalflapdivisionafterfreeflapsurgery
AT shirakawat efficacyofaprovisionalincisionforlongitudinalflapdivisionafterfreeflapsurgery
AT nishidam efficacyofaprovisionalincisionforlongitudinalflapdivisionafterfreeflapsurgery
AT futamurak efficacyofaprovisionalincisionforlongitudinalflapdivisionafterfreeflapsurgery
AT kobayashiy efficacyofaprovisionalincisionforlongitudinalflapdivisionafterfreeflapsurgery
AT tsuchiday efficacyofaprovisionalincisionforlongitudinalflapdivisionafterfreeflapsurgery