Cargando…

No evidence for environmental filtering of cavity‐nesting solitary bees and wasps by urbanization using trap nests

Spatial patterns in biodiversity are used to establish conservation priorities and ecosystem management plans. The environmental filtering of communities along urbanization gradients has been used to explain biodiversity patterns but demonstrating filtering requires precise statistical tests to link...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Garland, Sookhan, Nicholas, Carscadden, Kelly A., MacIvor, James Scott
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9526028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36203633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9360
_version_ 1784800789142700032
author Xie, Garland
Sookhan, Nicholas
Carscadden, Kelly A.
MacIvor, James Scott
author_facet Xie, Garland
Sookhan, Nicholas
Carscadden, Kelly A.
MacIvor, James Scott
author_sort Xie, Garland
collection PubMed
description Spatial patterns in biodiversity are used to establish conservation priorities and ecosystem management plans. The environmental filtering of communities along urbanization gradients has been used to explain biodiversity patterns but demonstrating filtering requires precise statistical tests to link suboptimal environments at one end of a gradient to lower population sizes via ecological traits. Here, we employ a three‐part framework on observational community data to test: (I) for trait clustering (i.e., phenotypic similarities among co‐occurring species) by comparing trait diversity to null expectations, (II) if trait clustering is correlated with an urbanization graient, and (III) if species' traits relate to environmental conditions. If all criteria are met, then there is evidence that urbanization is filtering communities based on their traits. We use a community of 46 solitary cavity‐nesting bee and wasp species sampled across Toronto, a large metropolitan city, over 3 years to test these hypotheses. None of the criteria were met, so we did not have evidence for environmental filtering. We do show that certain ecological traits influence which species perform well in urban environments. For example, cellophane bees (Hylaeus: Colletidae) secrete their own nesting material and were overrepresented in urban areas, while native leafcutting bees (Megachile: Megachilidae) were most common in greener areas. For wasps, prey preference was important, with aphid‐collecting (Psenulus and Passaloecus: Crabronidae) and generalist spider‐collecting (Trypoxylon: Crabronidae) wasps overrepresented in urban areas and caterpillar‐ and beetle‐collecting wasps (Euodynerus and Symmorphus: Vespidae, respectively) overrepresented in greener areas. We emphasize that changes in the prevalence of different traits across urban gradients without corresponding changes in trait diversity with urbanization do not constitute environmental filtering. By applying this rigorous framework, future studies can test whether urbanization filters other nesting guilds (i.e., ground‐nesting bees and wasps) or larger communities consisting of entire taxonomic groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9526028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95260282022-10-05 No evidence for environmental filtering of cavity‐nesting solitary bees and wasps by urbanization using trap nests Xie, Garland Sookhan, Nicholas Carscadden, Kelly A. MacIvor, James Scott Ecol Evol Research Articles Spatial patterns in biodiversity are used to establish conservation priorities and ecosystem management plans. The environmental filtering of communities along urbanization gradients has been used to explain biodiversity patterns but demonstrating filtering requires precise statistical tests to link suboptimal environments at one end of a gradient to lower population sizes via ecological traits. Here, we employ a three‐part framework on observational community data to test: (I) for trait clustering (i.e., phenotypic similarities among co‐occurring species) by comparing trait diversity to null expectations, (II) if trait clustering is correlated with an urbanization graient, and (III) if species' traits relate to environmental conditions. If all criteria are met, then there is evidence that urbanization is filtering communities based on their traits. We use a community of 46 solitary cavity‐nesting bee and wasp species sampled across Toronto, a large metropolitan city, over 3 years to test these hypotheses. None of the criteria were met, so we did not have evidence for environmental filtering. We do show that certain ecological traits influence which species perform well in urban environments. For example, cellophane bees (Hylaeus: Colletidae) secrete their own nesting material and were overrepresented in urban areas, while native leafcutting bees (Megachile: Megachilidae) were most common in greener areas. For wasps, prey preference was important, with aphid‐collecting (Psenulus and Passaloecus: Crabronidae) and generalist spider‐collecting (Trypoxylon: Crabronidae) wasps overrepresented in urban areas and caterpillar‐ and beetle‐collecting wasps (Euodynerus and Symmorphus: Vespidae, respectively) overrepresented in greener areas. We emphasize that changes in the prevalence of different traits across urban gradients without corresponding changes in trait diversity with urbanization do not constitute environmental filtering. By applying this rigorous framework, future studies can test whether urbanization filters other nesting guilds (i.e., ground‐nesting bees and wasps) or larger communities consisting of entire taxonomic groups. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9526028/ /pubmed/36203633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9360 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Xie, Garland
Sookhan, Nicholas
Carscadden, Kelly A.
MacIvor, James Scott
No evidence for environmental filtering of cavity‐nesting solitary bees and wasps by urbanization using trap nests
title No evidence for environmental filtering of cavity‐nesting solitary bees and wasps by urbanization using trap nests
title_full No evidence for environmental filtering of cavity‐nesting solitary bees and wasps by urbanization using trap nests
title_fullStr No evidence for environmental filtering of cavity‐nesting solitary bees and wasps by urbanization using trap nests
title_full_unstemmed No evidence for environmental filtering of cavity‐nesting solitary bees and wasps by urbanization using trap nests
title_short No evidence for environmental filtering of cavity‐nesting solitary bees and wasps by urbanization using trap nests
title_sort no evidence for environmental filtering of cavity‐nesting solitary bees and wasps by urbanization using trap nests
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9526028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36203633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9360
work_keys_str_mv AT xiegarland noevidenceforenvironmentalfilteringofcavitynestingsolitarybeesandwaspsbyurbanizationusingtrapnests
AT sookhannicholas noevidenceforenvironmentalfilteringofcavitynestingsolitarybeesandwaspsbyurbanizationusingtrapnests
AT carscaddenkellya noevidenceforenvironmentalfilteringofcavitynestingsolitarybeesandwaspsbyurbanizationusingtrapnests
AT macivorjamesscott noevidenceforenvironmentalfilteringofcavitynestingsolitarybeesandwaspsbyurbanizationusingtrapnests