Cargando…

Examining Access to Primary Care for People With Opioid Use Disorder in Ontario, Canada: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE: People with opioid use disorder are less likely than others to have a primary care physician. OBJECTIVE: To determine if family physicians are less likely to accept people with opioid use disorder as new patients than people with diabetes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomiz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spithoff, Sheryl, Mogic, Lana, Hum, Susan, Moineddin, Rahim, Meaney, Christopher, Kiran, Tara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9526081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36178686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33659
_version_ 1784800800057327616
author Spithoff, Sheryl
Mogic, Lana
Hum, Susan
Moineddin, Rahim
Meaney, Christopher
Kiran, Tara
author_facet Spithoff, Sheryl
Mogic, Lana
Hum, Susan
Moineddin, Rahim
Meaney, Christopher
Kiran, Tara
author_sort Spithoff, Sheryl
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: People with opioid use disorder are less likely than others to have a primary care physician. OBJECTIVE: To determine if family physicians are less likely to accept people with opioid use disorder as new patients than people with diabetes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial used an audit design to survey new patient intake at randomly selected family physicians in Ontario, Canada. Eligible physicians were independent practitioners allowed to prescribe opioids who were located in an office within 50 km of a population center greater than 20 000 people. A patient actor made unannounced telephone calls to family physicians asking for a new patient appointment. The data were analyzed in September 2021. INTERVENTION: In the first randomly assigned scenario, the patient actor played a role of patient with diabetes in treatment with an endocrinologist. In the second scenario, the patient actor played a role of a patient with opioid use disorder undergoing methadone treatment with an addiction physician. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Total offers of a new patient appointment; a secondary analysis compared the proportions of patients offered an appointment stratified by gender, population, model of care, and years in practice. RESULTS: Of a total 383 family physicians included in analysis, a greater proportion offered a new patient appointment to a patient with diabetes (21 of 185 physicians [11.4%]) than with opioid use disorder (8 of 198 physicians [4.0%]) (absolute difference, 7.4%; 95% CI, 2.0 to 12.6; P = .007). Physicians with more than 20 years in practice were almost 13 times less likely to offer an appointment to a patient with opioid use disorder compared with diabetes (1 of 108 physicians [0.9%] vs 10 of 84 physicians [11.9%]; absolute difference, 11.0; 95% CI, 3.8 to 18.1; P = .001). Women were almost 5 times less likely (3 of 111 physicians [2.7%] vs 14 of 114 physicians [12.3%]; absolute difference, 9.6%; 95% CI, 2.4 to 16.3; P = .007) to offer an appointment to a patient with opioid use disorder than with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial, family physicians were less likely to offer a new patient appointment to a patient with opioid use disorder compared with a patient with diabetes. Potential health system solutions to this disparity include strengthening policies for accepting new patients, improved compensation, and clinician anti-oppression training. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05484609
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9526081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95260812022-10-14 Examining Access to Primary Care for People With Opioid Use Disorder in Ontario, Canada: A Randomized Clinical Trial Spithoff, Sheryl Mogic, Lana Hum, Susan Moineddin, Rahim Meaney, Christopher Kiran, Tara JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: People with opioid use disorder are less likely than others to have a primary care physician. OBJECTIVE: To determine if family physicians are less likely to accept people with opioid use disorder as new patients than people with diabetes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial used an audit design to survey new patient intake at randomly selected family physicians in Ontario, Canada. Eligible physicians were independent practitioners allowed to prescribe opioids who were located in an office within 50 km of a population center greater than 20 000 people. A patient actor made unannounced telephone calls to family physicians asking for a new patient appointment. The data were analyzed in September 2021. INTERVENTION: In the first randomly assigned scenario, the patient actor played a role of patient with diabetes in treatment with an endocrinologist. In the second scenario, the patient actor played a role of a patient with opioid use disorder undergoing methadone treatment with an addiction physician. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Total offers of a new patient appointment; a secondary analysis compared the proportions of patients offered an appointment stratified by gender, population, model of care, and years in practice. RESULTS: Of a total 383 family physicians included in analysis, a greater proportion offered a new patient appointment to a patient with diabetes (21 of 185 physicians [11.4%]) than with opioid use disorder (8 of 198 physicians [4.0%]) (absolute difference, 7.4%; 95% CI, 2.0 to 12.6; P = .007). Physicians with more than 20 years in practice were almost 13 times less likely to offer an appointment to a patient with opioid use disorder compared with diabetes (1 of 108 physicians [0.9%] vs 10 of 84 physicians [11.9%]; absolute difference, 11.0; 95% CI, 3.8 to 18.1; P = .001). Women were almost 5 times less likely (3 of 111 physicians [2.7%] vs 14 of 114 physicians [12.3%]; absolute difference, 9.6%; 95% CI, 2.4 to 16.3; P = .007) to offer an appointment to a patient with opioid use disorder than with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial, family physicians were less likely to offer a new patient appointment to a patient with opioid use disorder compared with a patient with diabetes. Potential health system solutions to this disparity include strengthening policies for accepting new patients, improved compensation, and clinician anti-oppression training. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05484609 American Medical Association 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9526081/ /pubmed/36178686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33659 Text en Copyright 2022 Spithoff S et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Spithoff, Sheryl
Mogic, Lana
Hum, Susan
Moineddin, Rahim
Meaney, Christopher
Kiran, Tara
Examining Access to Primary Care for People With Opioid Use Disorder in Ontario, Canada: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title Examining Access to Primary Care for People With Opioid Use Disorder in Ontario, Canada: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Examining Access to Primary Care for People With Opioid Use Disorder in Ontario, Canada: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Examining Access to Primary Care for People With Opioid Use Disorder in Ontario, Canada: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Examining Access to Primary Care for People With Opioid Use Disorder in Ontario, Canada: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Examining Access to Primary Care for People With Opioid Use Disorder in Ontario, Canada: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort examining access to primary care for people with opioid use disorder in ontario, canada: a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9526081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36178686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33659
work_keys_str_mv AT spithoffsheryl examiningaccesstoprimarycareforpeoplewithopioidusedisorderinontariocanadaarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mogiclana examiningaccesstoprimarycareforpeoplewithopioidusedisorderinontariocanadaarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT humsusan examiningaccesstoprimarycareforpeoplewithopioidusedisorderinontariocanadaarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT moineddinrahim examiningaccesstoprimarycareforpeoplewithopioidusedisorderinontariocanadaarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT meaneychristopher examiningaccesstoprimarycareforpeoplewithopioidusedisorderinontariocanadaarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kirantara examiningaccesstoprimarycareforpeoplewithopioidusedisorderinontariocanadaarandomizedclinicaltrial