Cargando…
An evaluation of global Chikungunya clinical management guidelines: A systematic review
BACKGROUND: Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) has expanded its geographical reach in recent decades and is an emerging global health threat. CHIKV can cause significant morbidity and lead to chronic, debilitating arthritis/arthralgia in up to 40% of infected individuals. Prevention, early identification, an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9526181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36193172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101672 |
_version_ | 1784800822427648000 |
---|---|
author | Webb, Eika Michelen, Melina Rigby, Ishmeala Dagens, Andrew Dahmash, Dania Cheng, Vincent Joseph, Reena Lipworth, Samuel Harriss, Eli Cai, Erhui Nartowski, Robert Januraga, Pande Putu Gedela, Keerti Sukmaningrum, Evi Cevik, Muge Groves, Helen Hart, Peter Fletcher, Tom Blumberg, Lucille Horby, Peter W. Jacob, Shevin T. Sigfrid, Louise |
author_facet | Webb, Eika Michelen, Melina Rigby, Ishmeala Dagens, Andrew Dahmash, Dania Cheng, Vincent Joseph, Reena Lipworth, Samuel Harriss, Eli Cai, Erhui Nartowski, Robert Januraga, Pande Putu Gedela, Keerti Sukmaningrum, Evi Cevik, Muge Groves, Helen Hart, Peter Fletcher, Tom Blumberg, Lucille Horby, Peter W. Jacob, Shevin T. Sigfrid, Louise |
author_sort | Webb, Eika |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) has expanded its geographical reach in recent decades and is an emerging global health threat. CHIKV can cause significant morbidity and lead to chronic, debilitating arthritis/arthralgia in up to 40% of infected individuals. Prevention, early identification, and clinical management are key for improving outcomes. The aim of this review is to evaluate the quality, availability, inclusivity, and scope of evidence-based clinical management guidelines (CMG) for CHIKV globally. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review. Six databases were searched from Jan 1, 1989, to 14 Oct 2021 and grey literature until Sept 16, 2021, for CHIKV guidelines providing supportive care and treatment recommendations. Quality was assessed using the appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation tool. Findings are presented in a narrative synthesis. PROSPERO registration: CRD42020167361. FINDINGS: 28 CMGs were included; 54% (15/28) were produced more than 5 years ago, and most were of low-quality (median score 2 out of 7 (range 1–7)). There were variations in the CMGs’ guidance on the management of different at-risk populations, long-term sequelae, and the prevention of disease transmission. While 54% (15/28) of CMGs recommended hospitalisation for severe cases, only 39% (11/28) provided guidance for severe disease management. Further, 46% (13/28) advocated for steroids in the chronic phase, but 18% (5/28) advised against its use. INTERPRETATION: There was a lack of high-quality CMGs that provided supportive care and treatment guidance, which may impact patient care and outcomes. It is essential that existing guidelines are updated and adapted to provide detailed evidence-based treatment guidelines for different at-risk populations. This study also highlights a need for more research into the management of the acute and chronic phases of CHIKV infection to inform evidence-based care. FUNDING: The UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Wellcome Trust [215091/Z/18/Z] and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1209135]. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9526181 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95261812022-10-02 An evaluation of global Chikungunya clinical management guidelines: A systematic review Webb, Eika Michelen, Melina Rigby, Ishmeala Dagens, Andrew Dahmash, Dania Cheng, Vincent Joseph, Reena Lipworth, Samuel Harriss, Eli Cai, Erhui Nartowski, Robert Januraga, Pande Putu Gedela, Keerti Sukmaningrum, Evi Cevik, Muge Groves, Helen Hart, Peter Fletcher, Tom Blumberg, Lucille Horby, Peter W. Jacob, Shevin T. Sigfrid, Louise eClinicalMedicine Articles BACKGROUND: Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) has expanded its geographical reach in recent decades and is an emerging global health threat. CHIKV can cause significant morbidity and lead to chronic, debilitating arthritis/arthralgia in up to 40% of infected individuals. Prevention, early identification, and clinical management are key for improving outcomes. The aim of this review is to evaluate the quality, availability, inclusivity, and scope of evidence-based clinical management guidelines (CMG) for CHIKV globally. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review. Six databases were searched from Jan 1, 1989, to 14 Oct 2021 and grey literature until Sept 16, 2021, for CHIKV guidelines providing supportive care and treatment recommendations. Quality was assessed using the appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation tool. Findings are presented in a narrative synthesis. PROSPERO registration: CRD42020167361. FINDINGS: 28 CMGs were included; 54% (15/28) were produced more than 5 years ago, and most were of low-quality (median score 2 out of 7 (range 1–7)). There were variations in the CMGs’ guidance on the management of different at-risk populations, long-term sequelae, and the prevention of disease transmission. While 54% (15/28) of CMGs recommended hospitalisation for severe cases, only 39% (11/28) provided guidance for severe disease management. Further, 46% (13/28) advocated for steroids in the chronic phase, but 18% (5/28) advised against its use. INTERPRETATION: There was a lack of high-quality CMGs that provided supportive care and treatment guidance, which may impact patient care and outcomes. It is essential that existing guidelines are updated and adapted to provide detailed evidence-based treatment guidelines for different at-risk populations. This study also highlights a need for more research into the management of the acute and chronic phases of CHIKV infection to inform evidence-based care. FUNDING: The UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Wellcome Trust [215091/Z/18/Z] and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1209135]. Elsevier 2022-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9526181/ /pubmed/36193172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101672 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Articles Webb, Eika Michelen, Melina Rigby, Ishmeala Dagens, Andrew Dahmash, Dania Cheng, Vincent Joseph, Reena Lipworth, Samuel Harriss, Eli Cai, Erhui Nartowski, Robert Januraga, Pande Putu Gedela, Keerti Sukmaningrum, Evi Cevik, Muge Groves, Helen Hart, Peter Fletcher, Tom Blumberg, Lucille Horby, Peter W. Jacob, Shevin T. Sigfrid, Louise An evaluation of global Chikungunya clinical management guidelines: A systematic review |
title | An evaluation of global Chikungunya clinical management guidelines: A systematic review |
title_full | An evaluation of global Chikungunya clinical management guidelines: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | An evaluation of global Chikungunya clinical management guidelines: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | An evaluation of global Chikungunya clinical management guidelines: A systematic review |
title_short | An evaluation of global Chikungunya clinical management guidelines: A systematic review |
title_sort | evaluation of global chikungunya clinical management guidelines: a systematic review |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9526181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36193172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101672 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT webbeika anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT michelenmelina anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT rigbyishmeala anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT dagensandrew anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT dahmashdania anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT chengvincent anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT josephreena anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT lipworthsamuel anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT harrisseli anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT caierhui anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT nartowskirobert anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT januragapandeputu anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT gedelakeerti anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT sukmaningrumevi anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT cevikmuge anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT groveshelen anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT hartpeter anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT fletchertom anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT blumberglucille anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT horbypeterw anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT jacobshevint anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT sigfridlouise anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT webbeika evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT michelenmelina evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT rigbyishmeala evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT dagensandrew evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT dahmashdania evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT chengvincent evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT josephreena evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT lipworthsamuel evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT harrisseli evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT caierhui evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT nartowskirobert evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT januragapandeputu evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT gedelakeerti evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT sukmaningrumevi evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT cevikmuge evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT groveshelen evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT hartpeter evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT fletchertom evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT blumberglucille evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT horbypeterw evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT jacobshevint evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview AT sigfridlouise evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview |