Cargando…

An evaluation of global Chikungunya clinical management guidelines: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) has expanded its geographical reach in recent decades and is an emerging global health threat. CHIKV can cause significant morbidity and lead to chronic, debilitating arthritis/arthralgia in up to 40% of infected individuals. Prevention, early identification, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Webb, Eika, Michelen, Melina, Rigby, Ishmeala, Dagens, Andrew, Dahmash, Dania, Cheng, Vincent, Joseph, Reena, Lipworth, Samuel, Harriss, Eli, Cai, Erhui, Nartowski, Robert, Januraga, Pande Putu, Gedela, Keerti, Sukmaningrum, Evi, Cevik, Muge, Groves, Helen, Hart, Peter, Fletcher, Tom, Blumberg, Lucille, Horby, Peter W., Jacob, Shevin T., Sigfrid, Louise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9526181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36193172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101672
_version_ 1784800822427648000
author Webb, Eika
Michelen, Melina
Rigby, Ishmeala
Dagens, Andrew
Dahmash, Dania
Cheng, Vincent
Joseph, Reena
Lipworth, Samuel
Harriss, Eli
Cai, Erhui
Nartowski, Robert
Januraga, Pande Putu
Gedela, Keerti
Sukmaningrum, Evi
Cevik, Muge
Groves, Helen
Hart, Peter
Fletcher, Tom
Blumberg, Lucille
Horby, Peter W.
Jacob, Shevin T.
Sigfrid, Louise
author_facet Webb, Eika
Michelen, Melina
Rigby, Ishmeala
Dagens, Andrew
Dahmash, Dania
Cheng, Vincent
Joseph, Reena
Lipworth, Samuel
Harriss, Eli
Cai, Erhui
Nartowski, Robert
Januraga, Pande Putu
Gedela, Keerti
Sukmaningrum, Evi
Cevik, Muge
Groves, Helen
Hart, Peter
Fletcher, Tom
Blumberg, Lucille
Horby, Peter W.
Jacob, Shevin T.
Sigfrid, Louise
author_sort Webb, Eika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) has expanded its geographical reach in recent decades and is an emerging global health threat. CHIKV can cause significant morbidity and lead to chronic, debilitating arthritis/arthralgia in up to 40% of infected individuals. Prevention, early identification, and clinical management are key for improving outcomes. The aim of this review is to evaluate the quality, availability, inclusivity, and scope of evidence-based clinical management guidelines (CMG) for CHIKV globally. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review. Six databases were searched from Jan 1, 1989, to 14 Oct 2021 and grey literature until Sept 16, 2021, for CHIKV guidelines providing supportive care and treatment recommendations. Quality was assessed using the appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation tool. Findings are presented in a narrative synthesis. PROSPERO registration: CRD42020167361. FINDINGS: 28 CMGs were included; 54% (15/28) were produced more than 5 years ago, and most were of low-quality (median score 2 out of 7 (range 1–7)). There were variations in the CMGs’ guidance on the management of different at-risk populations, long-term sequelae, and the prevention of disease transmission. While 54% (15/28) of CMGs recommended hospitalisation for severe cases, only 39% (11/28) provided guidance for severe disease management. Further, 46% (13/28) advocated for steroids in the chronic phase, but 18% (5/28) advised against its use. INTERPRETATION: There was a lack of high-quality CMGs that provided supportive care and treatment guidance, which may impact patient care and outcomes. It is essential that existing guidelines are updated and adapted to provide detailed evidence-based treatment guidelines for different at-risk populations. This study also highlights a need for more research into the management of the acute and chronic phases of CHIKV infection to inform evidence-based care. FUNDING: The UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Wellcome Trust [215091/Z/18/Z] and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1209135].
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9526181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95261812022-10-02 An evaluation of global Chikungunya clinical management guidelines: A systematic review Webb, Eika Michelen, Melina Rigby, Ishmeala Dagens, Andrew Dahmash, Dania Cheng, Vincent Joseph, Reena Lipworth, Samuel Harriss, Eli Cai, Erhui Nartowski, Robert Januraga, Pande Putu Gedela, Keerti Sukmaningrum, Evi Cevik, Muge Groves, Helen Hart, Peter Fletcher, Tom Blumberg, Lucille Horby, Peter W. Jacob, Shevin T. Sigfrid, Louise eClinicalMedicine Articles BACKGROUND: Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) has expanded its geographical reach in recent decades and is an emerging global health threat. CHIKV can cause significant morbidity and lead to chronic, debilitating arthritis/arthralgia in up to 40% of infected individuals. Prevention, early identification, and clinical management are key for improving outcomes. The aim of this review is to evaluate the quality, availability, inclusivity, and scope of evidence-based clinical management guidelines (CMG) for CHIKV globally. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review. Six databases were searched from Jan 1, 1989, to 14 Oct 2021 and grey literature until Sept 16, 2021, for CHIKV guidelines providing supportive care and treatment recommendations. Quality was assessed using the appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation tool. Findings are presented in a narrative synthesis. PROSPERO registration: CRD42020167361. FINDINGS: 28 CMGs were included; 54% (15/28) were produced more than 5 years ago, and most were of low-quality (median score 2 out of 7 (range 1–7)). There were variations in the CMGs’ guidance on the management of different at-risk populations, long-term sequelae, and the prevention of disease transmission. While 54% (15/28) of CMGs recommended hospitalisation for severe cases, only 39% (11/28) provided guidance for severe disease management. Further, 46% (13/28) advocated for steroids in the chronic phase, but 18% (5/28) advised against its use. INTERPRETATION: There was a lack of high-quality CMGs that provided supportive care and treatment guidance, which may impact patient care and outcomes. It is essential that existing guidelines are updated and adapted to provide detailed evidence-based treatment guidelines for different at-risk populations. This study also highlights a need for more research into the management of the acute and chronic phases of CHIKV infection to inform evidence-based care. FUNDING: The UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Wellcome Trust [215091/Z/18/Z] and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1209135]. Elsevier 2022-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9526181/ /pubmed/36193172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101672 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Webb, Eika
Michelen, Melina
Rigby, Ishmeala
Dagens, Andrew
Dahmash, Dania
Cheng, Vincent
Joseph, Reena
Lipworth, Samuel
Harriss, Eli
Cai, Erhui
Nartowski, Robert
Januraga, Pande Putu
Gedela, Keerti
Sukmaningrum, Evi
Cevik, Muge
Groves, Helen
Hart, Peter
Fletcher, Tom
Blumberg, Lucille
Horby, Peter W.
Jacob, Shevin T.
Sigfrid, Louise
An evaluation of global Chikungunya clinical management guidelines: A systematic review
title An evaluation of global Chikungunya clinical management guidelines: A systematic review
title_full An evaluation of global Chikungunya clinical management guidelines: A systematic review
title_fullStr An evaluation of global Chikungunya clinical management guidelines: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of global Chikungunya clinical management guidelines: A systematic review
title_short An evaluation of global Chikungunya clinical management guidelines: A systematic review
title_sort evaluation of global chikungunya clinical management guidelines: a systematic review
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9526181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36193172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101672
work_keys_str_mv AT webbeika anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT michelenmelina anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT rigbyishmeala anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT dagensandrew anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT dahmashdania anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT chengvincent anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT josephreena anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT lipworthsamuel anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT harrisseli anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT caierhui anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT nartowskirobert anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT januragapandeputu anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT gedelakeerti anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT sukmaningrumevi anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT cevikmuge anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT groveshelen anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT hartpeter anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT fletchertom anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT blumberglucille anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT horbypeterw anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT jacobshevint anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT sigfridlouise anevaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT webbeika evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT michelenmelina evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT rigbyishmeala evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT dagensandrew evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT dahmashdania evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT chengvincent evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT josephreena evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT lipworthsamuel evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT harrisseli evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT caierhui evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT nartowskirobert evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT januragapandeputu evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT gedelakeerti evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT sukmaningrumevi evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT cevikmuge evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT groveshelen evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT hartpeter evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT fletchertom evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT blumberglucille evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT horbypeterw evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT jacobshevint evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview
AT sigfridlouise evaluationofglobalchikungunyaclinicalmanagementguidelinesasystematicreview