Cargando…

Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Casirivimab and Imdevimab in Ambulatory Patients with COVID-19

INTRODUCTION: Data on real-world effectiveness of subcutaneous (SC) casirivimab and imdevimab (CAS+IMD) for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are limited. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of SC CAS+IMD versus no antibody treatment among patients with COV...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jalbert, Jessica J., Hussein, Mohamed, Mastey, Vera, Sanchez, Robert J., Wang, Degang, Murdock, Dana, Fariñas, Laura, Bussey, Jonathan, Duart, Carlos, Hirshberg, Boaz, Weinreich, David M., Wei, Wenhui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9526200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36181639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-022-00691-z
_version_ 1784800827028799488
author Jalbert, Jessica J.
Hussein, Mohamed
Mastey, Vera
Sanchez, Robert J.
Wang, Degang
Murdock, Dana
Fariñas, Laura
Bussey, Jonathan
Duart, Carlos
Hirshberg, Boaz
Weinreich, David M.
Wei, Wenhui
author_facet Jalbert, Jessica J.
Hussein, Mohamed
Mastey, Vera
Sanchez, Robert J.
Wang, Degang
Murdock, Dana
Fariñas, Laura
Bussey, Jonathan
Duart, Carlos
Hirshberg, Boaz
Weinreich, David M.
Wei, Wenhui
author_sort Jalbert, Jessica J.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Data on real-world effectiveness of subcutaneous (SC) casirivimab and imdevimab (CAS+IMD) for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are limited. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of SC CAS+IMD versus no antibody treatment among patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study linked Komodo Health and CDR Maguire Health and Medical data. Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in ambulatory settings (August 1–October 30, 2021) treated with SC CAS+IMD were exact- and propensity score-matched to fewer than five untreated treatment-eligible patients and followed for the composite endpoint of 30-day all-cause mortality or COVID-19-related hospitalization. Kaplan–Meier estimators were used to calculate outcome risk overall and across subgroups. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Of 13,522 patients treated with CAS+IMD, 12,972 were matched to 41,848 untreated patients. The 30-day composite outcome risk was 1.9% (95% CI 1.7–2.2) and 4.4% (95% CI 4.2–4.6) in the treated and untreated cohorts, respectively; treated patients had a 49% lower relative risk of the composite outcome (aHR 0.51; 95% CI 0.46–0.58) and a 67% relative risk of 30-day mortality (aHR 0.33, 95% CI 0.18–0.60). Effectiveness was consistent across vaccination status and various subgroups. DISCUSSION: Patients with COVID-19 benefitted from treatment with SC CAS+IMD versus untreated patients. The results were consistent across subgroups of patients, including older adults, immunocompromised patients, and patients vaccinated against COVID-19. Results were robust across numerous sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: SC CAS+IMD is effective in reducing 30-day COVID-19-related hospitalization or mortality in real-world outpatient settings during the Delta-dominant period. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40121-022-00691-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9526200
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95262002022-10-03 Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Casirivimab and Imdevimab in Ambulatory Patients with COVID-19 Jalbert, Jessica J. Hussein, Mohamed Mastey, Vera Sanchez, Robert J. Wang, Degang Murdock, Dana Fariñas, Laura Bussey, Jonathan Duart, Carlos Hirshberg, Boaz Weinreich, David M. Wei, Wenhui Infect Dis Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Data on real-world effectiveness of subcutaneous (SC) casirivimab and imdevimab (CAS+IMD) for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are limited. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of SC CAS+IMD versus no antibody treatment among patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study linked Komodo Health and CDR Maguire Health and Medical data. Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in ambulatory settings (August 1–October 30, 2021) treated with SC CAS+IMD were exact- and propensity score-matched to fewer than five untreated treatment-eligible patients and followed for the composite endpoint of 30-day all-cause mortality or COVID-19-related hospitalization. Kaplan–Meier estimators were used to calculate outcome risk overall and across subgroups. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Of 13,522 patients treated with CAS+IMD, 12,972 were matched to 41,848 untreated patients. The 30-day composite outcome risk was 1.9% (95% CI 1.7–2.2) and 4.4% (95% CI 4.2–4.6) in the treated and untreated cohorts, respectively; treated patients had a 49% lower relative risk of the composite outcome (aHR 0.51; 95% CI 0.46–0.58) and a 67% relative risk of 30-day mortality (aHR 0.33, 95% CI 0.18–0.60). Effectiveness was consistent across vaccination status and various subgroups. DISCUSSION: Patients with COVID-19 benefitted from treatment with SC CAS+IMD versus untreated patients. The results were consistent across subgroups of patients, including older adults, immunocompromised patients, and patients vaccinated against COVID-19. Results were robust across numerous sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: SC CAS+IMD is effective in reducing 30-day COVID-19-related hospitalization or mortality in real-world outpatient settings during the Delta-dominant period. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40121-022-00691-z. Springer Healthcare 2022-10-01 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9526200/ /pubmed/36181639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-022-00691-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Jalbert, Jessica J.
Hussein, Mohamed
Mastey, Vera
Sanchez, Robert J.
Wang, Degang
Murdock, Dana
Fariñas, Laura
Bussey, Jonathan
Duart, Carlos
Hirshberg, Boaz
Weinreich, David M.
Wei, Wenhui
Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Casirivimab and Imdevimab in Ambulatory Patients with COVID-19
title Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Casirivimab and Imdevimab in Ambulatory Patients with COVID-19
title_full Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Casirivimab and Imdevimab in Ambulatory Patients with COVID-19
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Casirivimab and Imdevimab in Ambulatory Patients with COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Casirivimab and Imdevimab in Ambulatory Patients with COVID-19
title_short Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Casirivimab and Imdevimab in Ambulatory Patients with COVID-19
title_sort effectiveness of subcutaneous casirivimab and imdevimab in ambulatory patients with covid-19
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9526200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36181639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-022-00691-z
work_keys_str_mv AT jalbertjessicaj effectivenessofsubcutaneouscasirivimabandimdevimabinambulatorypatientswithcovid19
AT husseinmohamed effectivenessofsubcutaneouscasirivimabandimdevimabinambulatorypatientswithcovid19
AT masteyvera effectivenessofsubcutaneouscasirivimabandimdevimabinambulatorypatientswithcovid19
AT sanchezrobertj effectivenessofsubcutaneouscasirivimabandimdevimabinambulatorypatientswithcovid19
AT wangdegang effectivenessofsubcutaneouscasirivimabandimdevimabinambulatorypatientswithcovid19
AT murdockdana effectivenessofsubcutaneouscasirivimabandimdevimabinambulatorypatientswithcovid19
AT farinaslaura effectivenessofsubcutaneouscasirivimabandimdevimabinambulatorypatientswithcovid19
AT busseyjonathan effectivenessofsubcutaneouscasirivimabandimdevimabinambulatorypatientswithcovid19
AT duartcarlos effectivenessofsubcutaneouscasirivimabandimdevimabinambulatorypatientswithcovid19
AT hirshbergboaz effectivenessofsubcutaneouscasirivimabandimdevimabinambulatorypatientswithcovid19
AT weinreichdavidm effectivenessofsubcutaneouscasirivimabandimdevimabinambulatorypatientswithcovid19
AT weiwenhui effectivenessofsubcutaneouscasirivimabandimdevimabinambulatorypatientswithcovid19