Cargando…

Bi-directional Refractive Compensation for With-the-Rule and Against-the-Rule Astigmatism in Young Adults

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the short-term effect of imposing astigmatism on the refractive states of young adults. METHODS: Nineteen visually healthy low-astigmatic young adults (age = 20.94 ± 0.37 years; spherical-equivalent errors [M] = −1.47 ± 0.23 diopters [D]; cylindr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chan, Kin-Ho, Shik, Ho-Tin, Kwok, Kwan William, Kee, Chea-Su, Leung, Tsz-Wing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9526370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36155745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.63.10.15
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the short-term effect of imposing astigmatism on the refractive states of young adults. METHODS: Nineteen visually healthy low-astigmatic young adults (age = 20.94 ± 0.37 years; spherical-equivalent errors [M] = −1.47 ± 0.23 diopters [D]; cylindrical errors = −0.32 ± 0.05 D) were recruited. They were asked to wear a trial frame with treated and control lenses while watching a video for an hour. In three separate visits, the treated eye was exposed to one of three defocused conditions in random sequence: (1) with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism = +3.00 DC × 180 degrees; (2) against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism = +3.00 DC × 90 degrees; and (3) spherical defocus (SPH) = +3.00 DS. The control eye was fully corrected optically. Before and after watching the video, non-cycloplegic autorefraction was performed over the trial lenses. Refractive errors were decomposed into M, J0, and J45 astigmatism. Interocular differences in refractions (treated eye – control eye) were analyzed. RESULTS: After participants watched the video with monocular astigmatic defocus for an hour, the magnitude of the J0 astigmatism was significantly reduced by 0.25 ± 0.10 D in both WTR (from +1.53 ± 0.07 D to +1.28 ± 0.09 D) and 0.39 ± 0.15 D in ATR conditions (from −1.33 ± 0.06 D to −0.94 ± 0.18 D), suggesting an active compensation. In contrast, changes in J0 astigmatism were not significant in the SPH condition. No compensatory changes in J45 astigmatism or M were found under any conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Watching a video for an hour with astigmatic defocus induced bidirectional, compensatory changes in astigmatic components, suggesting that refractive components of young adults are moldable to compensate for orientation-specific astigmatic blur over a short period.