Cargando…

Validity and reliability of a french version of the olfactory disorders questionnaire

OBJECTIVE: To validate a French version of the Olfactory Disorders Questionnaire (Fr-ODQ). METHODS: Patients with olfactory disorder (OD) and controls were enrolled from two medical centers. Individuals completed the Fr-ODQ and the French version of the sinonasal outcome tool-22 (SNOT-22). The exten...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lechien, Jérôme R., Vaira, Luigi A., Le Bon, Serge D., Geerts, Roxane, Boscolo-Rizzo, Paolo, Saussez, Sven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9526523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36182947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-022-00598-2
_version_ 1784800893611278336
author Lechien, Jérôme R.
Vaira, Luigi A.
Le Bon, Serge D.
Geerts, Roxane
Boscolo-Rizzo, Paolo
Saussez, Sven
author_facet Lechien, Jérôme R.
Vaira, Luigi A.
Le Bon, Serge D.
Geerts, Roxane
Boscolo-Rizzo, Paolo
Saussez, Sven
author_sort Lechien, Jérôme R.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To validate a French version of the Olfactory Disorders Questionnaire (Fr-ODQ). METHODS: Patients with olfactory disorder (OD) and controls were enrolled from two medical centers. Individuals completed the Fr-ODQ and the French version of the sinonasal outcome tool-22 (SNOT-22). The extended Sniffin'Sticks procedure was used to test odor Threshold, Discrimination, and Identification (TDI). Cronbach’s alpha was used to measure the internal consistency of Fr-ODQ. The reliability and the external validity were evaluated through a test–retest approach and by correlating Fr-ODQ and SNOT-22 scores. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients with OD and 65 healthy individuals completed the evaluations. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.827, reporting adequate internal consistency. The test–retest reliability was high (r(s) = 0.944, p = 0.001). The external validity was adequate regarding the significant correlation between Fr-ODQ and SNOT-22 (r(s) = 0.498; p = 0.001). Patients with OD reported a significant higher score of Fr-ODQ than healthy individuals (p < 0.001), indicating a high internal validity. The baseline Fr-ODQ significantly improved after 3-month olfactory training, which corroborated the improvement of TDI scores. CONCLUSION: The Fr-ODQ is the first patient-reported outcome questionnaire validated for French speaking patients. Fr-ODQ is reliable and valid for the evaluation of the olfactory dysfunction and the related impact on quality of life of French-speaking patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40463-022-00598-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9526523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95265232022-10-03 Validity and reliability of a french version of the olfactory disorders questionnaire Lechien, Jérôme R. Vaira, Luigi A. Le Bon, Serge D. Geerts, Roxane Boscolo-Rizzo, Paolo Saussez, Sven J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Original Research Article OBJECTIVE: To validate a French version of the Olfactory Disorders Questionnaire (Fr-ODQ). METHODS: Patients with olfactory disorder (OD) and controls were enrolled from two medical centers. Individuals completed the Fr-ODQ and the French version of the sinonasal outcome tool-22 (SNOT-22). The extended Sniffin'Sticks procedure was used to test odor Threshold, Discrimination, and Identification (TDI). Cronbach’s alpha was used to measure the internal consistency of Fr-ODQ. The reliability and the external validity were evaluated through a test–retest approach and by correlating Fr-ODQ and SNOT-22 scores. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients with OD and 65 healthy individuals completed the evaluations. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.827, reporting adequate internal consistency. The test–retest reliability was high (r(s) = 0.944, p = 0.001). The external validity was adequate regarding the significant correlation between Fr-ODQ and SNOT-22 (r(s) = 0.498; p = 0.001). Patients with OD reported a significant higher score of Fr-ODQ than healthy individuals (p < 0.001), indicating a high internal validity. The baseline Fr-ODQ significantly improved after 3-month olfactory training, which corroborated the improvement of TDI scores. CONCLUSION: The Fr-ODQ is the first patient-reported outcome questionnaire validated for French speaking patients. Fr-ODQ is reliable and valid for the evaluation of the olfactory dysfunction and the related impact on quality of life of French-speaking patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40463-022-00598-2. BioMed Central 2022-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9526523/ /pubmed/36182947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-022-00598-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Lechien, Jérôme R.
Vaira, Luigi A.
Le Bon, Serge D.
Geerts, Roxane
Boscolo-Rizzo, Paolo
Saussez, Sven
Validity and reliability of a french version of the olfactory disorders questionnaire
title Validity and reliability of a french version of the olfactory disorders questionnaire
title_full Validity and reliability of a french version of the olfactory disorders questionnaire
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of a french version of the olfactory disorders questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of a french version of the olfactory disorders questionnaire
title_short Validity and reliability of a french version of the olfactory disorders questionnaire
title_sort validity and reliability of a french version of the olfactory disorders questionnaire
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9526523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36182947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-022-00598-2
work_keys_str_mv AT lechienjeromer validityandreliabilityofafrenchversionoftheolfactorydisordersquestionnaire
AT vairaluigia validityandreliabilityofafrenchversionoftheolfactorydisordersquestionnaire
AT lebonserged validityandreliabilityofafrenchversionoftheolfactorydisordersquestionnaire
AT geertsroxane validityandreliabilityofafrenchversionoftheolfactorydisordersquestionnaire
AT boscolorizzopaolo validityandreliabilityofafrenchversionoftheolfactorydisordersquestionnaire
AT saussezsven validityandreliabilityofafrenchversionoftheolfactorydisordersquestionnaire