Cargando…
Breast cancer prediction with transcriptome profiling using feature selection and machine learning methods
BACKGROUND: We used a hybrid machine learning systems (HMLS) strategy that includes the extensive search for the discovery of the most optimal HMLSs, including feature selection algorithms, a feature extraction algorithm, and classifiers for diagnosing breast cancer. Hence, this study aims to obtain...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9526906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36183055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-022-04965-8 |
_version_ | 1784800974491090944 |
---|---|
author | Taghizadeh, Eskandar Heydarheydari, Sahel Saberi, Alihossein JafarpoorNesheli, Shabnam Rezaeijo, Seyed Masoud |
author_facet | Taghizadeh, Eskandar Heydarheydari, Sahel Saberi, Alihossein JafarpoorNesheli, Shabnam Rezaeijo, Seyed Masoud |
author_sort | Taghizadeh, Eskandar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We used a hybrid machine learning systems (HMLS) strategy that includes the extensive search for the discovery of the most optimal HMLSs, including feature selection algorithms, a feature extraction algorithm, and classifiers for diagnosing breast cancer. Hence, this study aims to obtain a high-importance transcriptome profile linked with classification procedures that can facilitate the early detection of breast cancer. METHODS: In the present study, 762 breast cancer patients and 138 solid tissue normal subjects were included. Three groups of machine learning (ML) algorithms were employed: (i) four feature selection procedures are employed and compared to select the most valuable feature: (1) ANOVA; (2) Mutual Information; (3) Extra Trees Classifier; and (4) Logistic Regression (LGR), (ii) a feature extraction algorithm (Principal Component Analysis), iii) we utilized 13 classification algorithms accompanied with automated ML hyperparameter tuning, including (1) LGR; (2) Support Vector Machine; (3) Bagging; (4) Gaussian Naive Bayes; (5) Decision Tree; (6) Gradient Boosting Decision Tree; (7) K Nearest Neighborhood; (8) Bernoulli Naive Bayes; (9) Random Forest; (10) AdaBoost, (11) ExtraTrees; (12) Linear Discriminant Analysis; and (13) Multilayer Perceptron (MLP). For evaluating the proposed models' performance, balance accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) were used. RESULTS: Feature selection procedure LGR + MLP classifier achieved the highest prediction accuracy and AUC (balanced accuracy: 0.86, AUC = 0.94), followed by an LGR + LGR classifier (balanced accuracy: 0.84, AUC = 0.94). The results showed that achieved AUC for the LGR + LGR classifier belonged to the 20 biomarkers as follows: TMEM212, SNORD115-13, ATP1A4, FRG2, CFHR4, ZCCHC13, FLJ46361, LY6G6E, ZNF323, KRT28, KRT25, LPPR5, C10orf99, PRKACG, SULT2A1, GRIN2C, EN2, GBA2, CUX2, and SNORA66. CONCLUSIONS: The best performance was achieved using the LGR feature selection procedure and MLP classifier. Results show that the 20 biomarkers had the highest score or ranking in breast cancer detection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9526906 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95269062022-10-03 Breast cancer prediction with transcriptome profiling using feature selection and machine learning methods Taghizadeh, Eskandar Heydarheydari, Sahel Saberi, Alihossein JafarpoorNesheli, Shabnam Rezaeijo, Seyed Masoud BMC Bioinformatics Research BACKGROUND: We used a hybrid machine learning systems (HMLS) strategy that includes the extensive search for the discovery of the most optimal HMLSs, including feature selection algorithms, a feature extraction algorithm, and classifiers for diagnosing breast cancer. Hence, this study aims to obtain a high-importance transcriptome profile linked with classification procedures that can facilitate the early detection of breast cancer. METHODS: In the present study, 762 breast cancer patients and 138 solid tissue normal subjects were included. Three groups of machine learning (ML) algorithms were employed: (i) four feature selection procedures are employed and compared to select the most valuable feature: (1) ANOVA; (2) Mutual Information; (3) Extra Trees Classifier; and (4) Logistic Regression (LGR), (ii) a feature extraction algorithm (Principal Component Analysis), iii) we utilized 13 classification algorithms accompanied with automated ML hyperparameter tuning, including (1) LGR; (2) Support Vector Machine; (3) Bagging; (4) Gaussian Naive Bayes; (5) Decision Tree; (6) Gradient Boosting Decision Tree; (7) K Nearest Neighborhood; (8) Bernoulli Naive Bayes; (9) Random Forest; (10) AdaBoost, (11) ExtraTrees; (12) Linear Discriminant Analysis; and (13) Multilayer Perceptron (MLP). For evaluating the proposed models' performance, balance accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) were used. RESULTS: Feature selection procedure LGR + MLP classifier achieved the highest prediction accuracy and AUC (balanced accuracy: 0.86, AUC = 0.94), followed by an LGR + LGR classifier (balanced accuracy: 0.84, AUC = 0.94). The results showed that achieved AUC for the LGR + LGR classifier belonged to the 20 biomarkers as follows: TMEM212, SNORD115-13, ATP1A4, FRG2, CFHR4, ZCCHC13, FLJ46361, LY6G6E, ZNF323, KRT28, KRT25, LPPR5, C10orf99, PRKACG, SULT2A1, GRIN2C, EN2, GBA2, CUX2, and SNORA66. CONCLUSIONS: The best performance was achieved using the LGR feature selection procedure and MLP classifier. Results show that the 20 biomarkers had the highest score or ranking in breast cancer detection. BioMed Central 2022-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9526906/ /pubmed/36183055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-022-04965-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Taghizadeh, Eskandar Heydarheydari, Sahel Saberi, Alihossein JafarpoorNesheli, Shabnam Rezaeijo, Seyed Masoud Breast cancer prediction with transcriptome profiling using feature selection and machine learning methods |
title | Breast cancer prediction with transcriptome profiling using feature selection and machine learning methods |
title_full | Breast cancer prediction with transcriptome profiling using feature selection and machine learning methods |
title_fullStr | Breast cancer prediction with transcriptome profiling using feature selection and machine learning methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Breast cancer prediction with transcriptome profiling using feature selection and machine learning methods |
title_short | Breast cancer prediction with transcriptome profiling using feature selection and machine learning methods |
title_sort | breast cancer prediction with transcriptome profiling using feature selection and machine learning methods |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9526906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36183055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-022-04965-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taghizadeheskandar breastcancerpredictionwithtranscriptomeprofilingusingfeatureselectionandmachinelearningmethods AT heydarheydarisahel breastcancerpredictionwithtranscriptomeprofilingusingfeatureselectionandmachinelearningmethods AT saberialihossein breastcancerpredictionwithtranscriptomeprofilingusingfeatureselectionandmachinelearningmethods AT jafarpoorneshelishabnam breastcancerpredictionwithtranscriptomeprofilingusingfeatureselectionandmachinelearningmethods AT rezaeijoseyedmasoud breastcancerpredictionwithtranscriptomeprofilingusingfeatureselectionandmachinelearningmethods |